RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소비재 제품의 사용자 경험 인증 평가를 위한 평가 체계 개발 및 검증

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106190625

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: This study aims to develop a user experience evaluation framework to enable evaluation of user experience on various customer goods. Background: Lack of resources and capabilities to improve the quality of the user experience has made it...

      Objective: This study aims to develop a user experience evaluation framework to enable evaluation of user experience on various customer goods.
      Background: Lack of resources and capabilities to improve the quality of the user experience has made it difficult for small and medium-sized businesses to develop user-centered products. An effective user experience evaluation framework is needed to effectively support small and medium-sized businesses.
      Method: The evaluation framework of this study was developed through the following steps. Firstly, we collected and structured product components of various product groups systematically according to user experience characteristics. Then, we gathered and organized core user experience elements based on a number of user reviews and previous related studies. And, we matched up product component with user experience element according to core user experience attributes of each product component. Additionally, we collected and selected major tasks and scenarios that is frequent and critical when using the product. Lastly, we developed user experience evaluation forms by matching product components, user experience element, major tasks, and scenarios.
      Results: A user experience evaluation framework and forms were developed by collecting more than 45 research studies and 4685 user experience elements. Based on the evaluation framework developed over four years, 161 users and 54 experts evaluated 143 kinds of products. Based on the evaluation results, the evaluation framework developed in this study was verified and validated its effectiveness.
      Conclusion: We have developed a user experience evaluation framework that can evaluate the user experience of various customer goods and it was effective in finding the factors that have a great influence on the usability and user experience of the customer goods.
      Application: It is expected that the user experience evaluation framework developed in this study could be applicable to the development of a certification system to effectively reflect and improve the user experience quality of consumer goods.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. User Experience Evaluation System Development Process
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion & Conclusion
      • References
      • 1. Introduction
      • 2. User Experience Evaluation System Development Process
      • 3. Results
      • 4. Discussion & Conclusion
      • References
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서현덕, "제품디자인을 위한 사용자 인지 감성 요인 평가 프레임워크 - 주방용품 사용자 경험 중심으로 -" 한국디자인트렌드학회 (53) : 283-296, 2016

      2 이수봉, "디자인혁신이 중소기업의 국제경쟁력에 미치는 영향" 한국디자인학회 19 (19): 163-174, 2006

      3 김정룡, "다자 중심적 사용성 평가 방법의 구조화 과정" 대한인간공학회 24 (24): 25-33, 2005

      4 Hassenzahl, M., "User experience-a research agenda" 25 (25): 91-97, 2006

      5 Law, E. L. C., "Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach" ACM 719-728, 2009

      6 Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., "Towards practical user experience evaluation methods" 19-22, 2008

      7 Lee, K. I., "Study for Scenario based usability evaluation framework model in environment of using product. -With a Focus on home appliances" 382-385, 2008

      8 Park, J., "Development of a web-based user experience evaluation system for home appliances" 67 : 216-228, 2018

      9 이원섭, "Development of a Comprehensive Usability Testing and Analysis Framework for the Physical Interface Between Product and User" 대한인간공학회 30 (30): 331-338, 2011

      10 Lee, W. S., "Development of a Comprehensive Usability Evaluation System based on User Needs" 1-7, 2008

      1 서현덕, "제품디자인을 위한 사용자 인지 감성 요인 평가 프레임워크 - 주방용품 사용자 경험 중심으로 -" 한국디자인트렌드학회 (53) : 283-296, 2016

      2 이수봉, "디자인혁신이 중소기업의 국제경쟁력에 미치는 영향" 한국디자인학회 19 (19): 163-174, 2006

      3 김정룡, "다자 중심적 사용성 평가 방법의 구조화 과정" 대한인간공학회 24 (24): 25-33, 2005

      4 Hassenzahl, M., "User experience-a research agenda" 25 (25): 91-97, 2006

      5 Law, E. L. C., "Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach" ACM 719-728, 2009

      6 Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., "Towards practical user experience evaluation methods" 19-22, 2008

      7 Lee, K. I., "Study for Scenario based usability evaluation framework model in environment of using product. -With a Focus on home appliances" 382-385, 2008

      8 Park, J., "Development of a web-based user experience evaluation system for home appliances" 67 : 216-228, 2018

      9 이원섭, "Development of a Comprehensive Usability Testing and Analysis Framework for the Physical Interface Between Product and User" 대한인간공학회 30 (30): 331-338, 2011

      10 Lee, W. S., "Development of a Comprehensive Usability Evaluation System based on User Needs" 1-7, 2008

      11 Park, J., "Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: survey, interview, and observation approaches" 23 (23): 279-293, 2013

      12 Lim, C. H., "Comparison and Selection of Usability Evaluation Methods" 19 (19): 87-94, 1996

      13 Kwahk, J., "A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products" 33 (33): 419-431, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼