T-REX 삼축 가속도계의 다양한 부착위치에 따른 신체활동량 추정 타당도 검증

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 연구의 목적은 새로 개발된 삼축 가속도계인 T-REX의 신체활동량 추정에 대한 타당도를 준거 도구(가스호흡분석기)와 참고 도구(가속도계)와의 비교를 통해 검증하는 것이다. 건강한 20대 남녀 50명은 운동자각인지도 12-14 수준으로 훌라후프, 스텝박스, 줄넘기와 제자리 걷기를 수행하였다. 대상자들은 운동을 수행하는 동안 T-REX(발목, 상완, 가슴, 허리, 손목 위치)와, ActiGraph(허리 위치), Actical(허리, 가슴 위치)을 착용하였으며, 산소섭취량이 동시에 측정 되었다. 타당성은 피어슨 상관계수로 분석하였다. T-REX는 발목, 가슴, 허리 위치에서 스텝박스 운동과(r=.83-.91) 훌라후프 운동 시 상완과 손목 위치에서(r=.82-.84) 산소섭취량과 매우 강한 상관관계를 보였으며, 제자리 걷기 운동 시에는 상완과 손목에서 보통이상의 상관관계(r=.63-.71)를 나타내었다. T-REX는 두 종류의 참고도구와 비교했을 때 산소섭취량과 더 높은 상관관계를 보여, 신체활동 검사 도구로 충분히 상용화될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study examined the validity of the T-REX accelerometer to measure physical activity in men and women comparing with Actigraph and Actical. Fifty healthy men and women completed four different types of exercise (step box, jump rope, Hula hoop, and on-site walking) at a perceived exertion intensity rated 12-14. Oxygen uptake (VO₂) were assessed from all participants while assessing physical activity using T-REX (attached at the ankle, arm, chest, waist, and wrist) and, simultaneously, Actigraph (attached at waist) and Actical (attached at the waist and chest), respectively. VO₂ was measured using the Cosmed K4b2 portablesystem. There were very strong to strong associations between T-REX and VO₂ measured during Step box activity (T-REXs were attached at the ankle (r=.91), chest (r=.83), and waist (r=.86). There were also strong associations between T-REX and VO₂ measured during Hula hoop activity (T-REXs were attached to the arm (r=.82) and wrist (r=.84). Also, there were significant associations between T-REX and VO₂ measured during on-site walking at five locations (r=.63-.71). When compared with ActiGraph and Actical, T-REX showed higher associations with VO₂, which indicates a superior instrument to measure physical activity. The T-REX has high validity with VO₂ to measure physical activity including Step box activity in three locations (ankle, chest, and waist), Hula hoop activity in two locations (arm, wrist), and on-site walking in one location (ankle).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이대택, "자동변속 유무에 따른 트레드밀에서의 간접열량측정법과 예측공식에 의한 운동에너지소비량 비교 연구" 국민체육진흥공단 부설 한국스포츠개발원 20 (20): 755-766, 2009

2 이미영, "객관적 신체활동 검사도구의 타당도와 신뢰도검증: Actigraph GT3X와 Omron HJ720IT" 한국체육측정평가학회 14 (14): 01-13, 2012

3 이미영, "객관적 신체활동 검사도구의 타당도 증거와 검증 절차: 체계적 문헌분석" 한국체육측정평가학회 13 (13): 17-37, 2011

4 Bassett, D. R., "Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity" 71 (71): S30-S36, 2000

5 Rowlands, A. V., "Validation of the RT3 triaxial accelerometer for the assessment of physical activity" 36 (36): 518-524, 2004

6 DALE W. ESLIGER, "Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer" Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 43 (43): 1085-1093, 2011

7 Eric B Hekler, "Validation of Physical Activity Tracking via Android Smartphones Compared to ActiGraph Accelerometer: Laboratory-Based and Free-Living Validation Studies" JMIR Publications Inc. 3 (3): e36-, 2015

8 Mark A Tully, "The validation of Fitbit Zip™ physical activity monitor as a measure of free-living physical activity" Springer Nature 7 (7): 952-, 2014

9 John Sieverdes, "Reliability and validity of the Mywellness Key physical activity monitor" Dove Medical Press Ltd. 5 : 13-20, 2013

10 Randal C. Foster, "Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure" Elsevier BV 41 (41): 778-783, 2005

11 Kristin Taraldsen, "Physical activity monitoring by use of accelerometer-based body-worn sensors in older adults: A systematic literature review of current knowledge and applications" Elsevier BV 71 (71): 13-19, 2012

12 KATHERINE S. HALL, "METs and Accelerometry of Walking in Older Adults" Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 45 (45): 574-582, 2013

13 Dane R. Van Domelen, "Is There a Sex Difference in Accelerometer Counts during Walking in Older Adults?" Human Kinetics 11 (11): 626-637, 2014

14 이미현, "GT1M과 GT3X가속도계의 신체활동량 추정 타당도 평가" 한국체육측정평가학회 14 (14): 61-71, 2012

15 P. S. Freedson, "Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting METs and activity type from accelerometer data: validation on an independent sample" American Physiological Society 111 (111): 1804-1812, 2011

16 Swartz, A. M., "Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites" 32 : S450-S456, 2000

17 LOUIS ATALLAH, "Energy Expenditure Prediction Using a Miniaturized Ear-Worn Sensor" Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 43 (43): 1369-1377, 2011

18 WHITNEY A. WELCH, "Cross-validation of Waist-Worn GENEA Accelerometer Cut-Points" Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 46 (46): 1825-1830, 2014

19 Trost, S. G., "Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research" 37 : S531-S543, 2005

20 Dong, B., "Comparing metabolic energy expenditure estimation using wearable multi-sensor network and single accelerometer" 2866-2869, 2013

21 Freedson, P. S., "Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer" 30 (30): 777-781, 1998

22 NANCY F. BUTTE, "Assessing Physical Activity Using Wearable Monitors" Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 44 : S5-S12, 2012

23 J. Staudenmayer, "An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer" American Physiological Society 107 (107): 1300-1307, 2009

24 Dongwoo, K., "Activity energy expenditure assessment system based on activity classification using multi-site triaxial accelerometers" 2007 : 2285-2287, 2007

25 Ellis, K., "A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers" 35 (35): 2191-2203, 2014

26 S E Crouter, "A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer" BMJ 42 (42): 217-224, 2008

27 Kate Lyden, "A comprehensive evaluation of commonly used accelerometer energy expenditure and MET prediction equations" Springer Nature 111 (111): 187-201, 2011