RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    American Exceptionalism and the Institutional Foundations of Economic Sanctions = The Case of the Massachusetts Burma Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76536295

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper explores possible links between American exceptionalism as a set of institutional characteristics and the frequent use of economic sanctions by the United States, using the case of the Massachusetts Burma Law. From an institutionalist perspective, I argue that America’s recurrent use of moral issues in addressing foreign relations is an outcome of the institutional universe that allows political entrepreneurs to set an agenda and push for it in a strategically efficient way. If one were to explain why Americans keep making domestic laws targeting foreign countries with poor human rights records, the dimension of American exceptionalism cannot be easily omitted in modeling causal relationship. This paper has no intention to deny the causal role of ideas in entirety; rather it seeks to clarify under what circumstances American exceptionalism as a belief system helps shape the policy contours of major political actors. As a fully independent role of ideas is not easy to measure in empirical tests, I here suggest some institutional characteristics that lead career-maximizing politicians to design foreign policy initiatives popular among the local constituency.
    번역하기

    This paper explores possible links between American exceptionalism as a set of institutional characteristics and the frequent use of economic sanctions by the United States, using the case of the Massachusetts Burma Law. From an institutionalist persp...

    This paper explores possible links between American exceptionalism as a set of institutional characteristics and the frequent use of economic sanctions by the United States, using the case of the Massachusetts Burma Law. From an institutionalist perspective, I argue that America’s recurrent use of moral issues in addressing foreign relations is an outcome of the institutional universe that allows political entrepreneurs to set an agenda and push for it in a strategically efficient way. If one were to explain why Americans keep making domestic laws targeting foreign countries with poor human rights records, the dimension of American exceptionalism cannot be easily omitted in modeling causal relationship. This paper has no intention to deny the causal role of ideas in entirety; rather it seeks to clarify under what circumstances American exceptionalism as a belief system helps shape the policy contours of major political actors. As a fully independent role of ideas is not easy to measure in empirical tests, I here suggest some institutional characteristics that lead career-maximizing politicians to design foreign policy initiatives popular among the local constituency.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼