회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the reorganization procedure, various classes of stakeholders participate.
The law helps them make a group decision by classifying them into secured creditors, unsecured creditors, shareholders and interest holders and requiring a vote by each class on the reorganization plan (Article 236). The adoption of the reorganization plan requires the affirmative vote by all classes. However,even if the affirmative vote in one or more classes is less than the legal threshold for approval, the court is allowed to approve the reorganization plan (Article 244). This measure is called cramdown. It is intended to promote the efficient reorganization of a debtor and the protection of the rights of the stakeholders in a non-approving class on the basis that it is not socio-economically desirable to prevent a reorganization procedure for a debtor that deserves the reorganization only because of unreasonable demands by certain stakeholders.
In this paper, the focus is on the detailed review of the contents and the meanings of the laws relating to the legal requirements and specific processes for the cramdown. In Chapter 2, the specific legal requirements for the courts to set forth the protection conditions and cram down the plan are reviewed in detail. Also included in this review is the general requirements for the approval of the reorganization plan as a part of such specific legal requirements. In Chapter 3, the procedures to set forth the protection conditions are divided into making the protection conditions before and after the plan is disapproved and the legal implications in each case are analyzed. Through this analysis, it is attempted to set forth the reasonable basis for understanding fairness and equity, relative priority rule and absolute priority rule, best interest of creditors principle, etc.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(하), 제3판(개정증보)" 박영사 2011

2 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상), 제3판(개정증보)" 박영사 2011

3 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상)" 박영사 2006

4 오수근, "회사정리절차에서 평등･공정･형평의 개념" 22 : 2000

5 김성용, "회사정리법상의 강제인가 제도" 557 : 2003

6 임채홍, "회사정리법(하), 제2판" 한국사법행정학회 2002

7 김효신, "회사정리법 제233조의 공정･형평성의 의미" 11 (11): 2000

8 임치용, "파산법 연구" 박영사 2004

9 이원삼, "통합도산법의 기업회생절차상 자산의 평가기준" 한국기업법학회 21 (21): 298-323, 2007

10 오수근, "청산가치를 하회하는 정리계획안의 당부" 23 : 2001

11 김성용, "채무자 회생 및 파산에 관한 법률 개정 공청회 주제발표문"

12 이진만, "정리계획인가의 요건인 공정･형평의 의미와 청산가치의 보장"

13 윤남근, "도산절차에 있어서 재산 및 기업가치의 평가" 법학연구원 (56) : 613-657, 2010

14 오수근, "도산법의 이해" 이화여자대학교출판부 2008

15 김성용, "도산법에 대한 법경제학적 고찰" 한국법경제학회 8 (8): 123-168, 2011

16 주진암, "강제인가제도의 합리적 운영" 2009

17 三ヶ月 章, "条解 會社更生法(下)" 弘文堂 1998

18 伊藤眞, "新しい會社更生法" 有斐閣 2004

19 Ferriell, Jeff, "Understanding Bankruptcy, 2. Edition" LexisNexis 2007

20 Warren, Elizabeth, "The law of debtors and creditors: text, cases and problems, 6. Edition" Jay Lawrence Westbrook 2009

21 Hess, Harald, "Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung mit EGInsO, Band 1" C.F.Müller 1999

22 Anres, Dirk, "Insolvenzordung(InsO), 1. Aufl" C.H. Beck 2006

23 Eickmann, Dieter, "Heidelberger Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung(본문에서는 HK-InsO이라 한다), 4. Aufl" C. F. Müller 2006

24 Epstein, David G., "Bankruptcy" West Broup 1993