RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A study of perceived product quality transparency in online shopping product description pages.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106930100

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The category and method of product description are expanding as the genre in Home Meal Replacement(HMR) products expand, and as the consumers’ demand for transparency in product quality increase. Studies encourage utilization of photographic images ...

      The category and method of product description are expanding as the genre in Home Meal Replacement(HMR) products expand, and as the consumers’ demand for transparency in product quality increase. Studies encourage utilization of photographic images to increase product transparency. With rapid increase in novel HMR products and brands, it is necessary to analyze current online product description pages and identify ways to improve product transparency.
      This study first conducted a hierarchical analysis of consumer awareness and corresponding product description categories related to product quality transparency. Second, we looked into whether the font-centric or image-centric description is a more transparent way of communicating information for each product description category. The investigation started with a literature review, followed by a case study analysis of product description categories and description methods in current online food and grocery shopping markets. An online survey was employed to investigate hierarchy in product quality transparency among product description categories and description methods. The study found that the product description categories that consumers perceived as most to least transparent in terms of providing product quality were product summary, food images and descriptions, packaging and storing information, customer reviews and questions, how to eat/cook/store, brand, check list, delivery information, and related products. The results also illustrated that photographic product descriptions do not necessarily improve transparency. They do, however, provide a general explanation of the product. Text descriptions can be more supportive in providing transparency in product quality in some categories of product description, such as brand and produce. The study could be helpful for designing the layout of product description information and selection of transparent product description methods.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김효정, "성인 소비자의 온라인을 통한 식품 구매 행동 및 구매 결정 영향 요인 분석" 한국식품영양과학회 48 (48): 97-108, 2019

      2 김혜진, "모바일을 통한 식품 구매 품질 속성에 대한 고객만족도와 충성도 관계에서 신뢰와 몰입의 조절 효과" 한국식품영양과학회 47 (47): 207-221, 2018

      3 "https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190104116100030"

      4 "https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2019/01/9939/"

      5 "https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2019021410191"

      6 "https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/transparency"

      7 "http://premium.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/08/07/2015080702293.html"

      8 Yael Benn, "What information do consumers consider, and how do they look for it, when shopping for groceries online" 89 : 265-273, 2015

      9 Grunert, K. G., "Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries" 18 (18): 261-277, 2010

      10 Toni Gomes, "The Effect of Full Body versus Partial Body Graphic Labelling on Beverage Packaging" 27 : 933-943, 2014

      1 김효정, "성인 소비자의 온라인을 통한 식품 구매 행동 및 구매 결정 영향 요인 분석" 한국식품영양과학회 48 (48): 97-108, 2019

      2 김혜진, "모바일을 통한 식품 구매 품질 속성에 대한 고객만족도와 충성도 관계에서 신뢰와 몰입의 조절 효과" 한국식품영양과학회 47 (47): 207-221, 2018

      3 "https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20190104116100030"

      4 "https://www.mk.co.kr/news/economy/view/2019/01/9939/"

      5 "https://www.hankyung.com/economy/article/2019021410191"

      6 "https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/transparency"

      7 "http://premium.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2015/08/07/2015080702293.html"

      8 Yael Benn, "What information do consumers consider, and how do they look for it, when shopping for groceries online" 89 : 265-273, 2015

      9 Grunert, K. G., "Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries" 18 (18): 261-277, 2010

      10 Toni Gomes, "The Effect of Full Body versus Partial Body Graphic Labelling on Beverage Packaging" 27 : 933-943, 2014

      11 Grunert, K. G., "Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK" 55 (55): 177-189, 2010

      12 Baumeister, R. F., "Free will in consumer behavior. Self-control, ego depletion, and choice" 18 (18): 4-13, 2008

      13 Cowburn, G., "Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling. A systematic review" 8 (8): 21-28, 2005

      14 가푸로프 딜셔드, "A Study of Uncertainty Factors Affecting Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Online Shopping" 한국경영정보학회 15 (15): 45-68, 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-02-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Bulletin of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art -> Journal of Basic Design & Art KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.34 0.34 0.512 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼