RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    독일제국 빌헬름 2세의 식민지정책과 동아시아 = Wilhelm II's Colonial Policy of German Empire and East Asia

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103772715

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Germany was unified at the peak of the colonial competition among European Powers. During this time, colonial competition faced a new era because of the Industrial Revolution. Colony was no longer the resource of the profits with trade securing gold and silver to home. It was a part of total economic system from the source of cheap raw materials for the industry to the market for the manufactured goods. At the same time, because of the rise of nationalism, colony became the symbol of national pride.
    Otto von Bismarck maintained the policy to secure the security of newly created German Empire in Europe. Achieving this prime goal, he wanted to reduced the possible conflict among European nations from colonial competition. At the same time, Bismarck tried to dodge the political chaos between the liberals and conservatives over the colonial issue internally. Therefore, he used colonial issue as a political and diplomatic leverage to achieve his goals.
    Unfortunately, Bismarck failed to create a system to secure German Empire internally and externally. Since he was an exceptional politician, he could use this leverage effectively and efficiently. That is, German colonial policy as well as other major policies was controlled by Bismarck himself rather than a system.
    When Wilhelm II became a Kaiser, personally operated Bismarck system could not work. As a man of his own world view, Wilhelm II was a dangerous man at the dangerous time. Wilhelm II discarded Bismarck's policy of gradual and careful colonial expansion. He proclaimed the beginning of 'Der neue Kurs' to escape from the Bismarck's past. He adopted Weltpolitik as a tool of der neue Kurs. Weltpolitik was a policy to promote tension among the Powers to shift the balance of power. Doing so, he believed that Germany could secure the benefits.
    The first place to apply the Weltpolitik was in Korea. During the Sino-Japanese War, Berlin tried to shift the balance of power in Asia. Berlin secured the first colony in Asia in Chiaochao Bay in Shantung through the Triple Intervention. This short-term success became the poison for the future of German Empire. Wilhelm II continued this policy during the Russo-Japanese War and failed. Still, he did not give up and applied same policy in Africa that resulted the World War I.
    번역하기

    Germany was unified at the peak of the colonial competition among European Powers. During this time, colonial competition faced a new era because of the Industrial Revolution. Colony was no longer the resource of the profits with trade securing gold a...

    Germany was unified at the peak of the colonial competition among European Powers. During this time, colonial competition faced a new era because of the Industrial Revolution. Colony was no longer the resource of the profits with trade securing gold and silver to home. It was a part of total economic system from the source of cheap raw materials for the industry to the market for the manufactured goods. At the same time, because of the rise of nationalism, colony became the symbol of national pride.
    Otto von Bismarck maintained the policy to secure the security of newly created German Empire in Europe. Achieving this prime goal, he wanted to reduced the possible conflict among European nations from colonial competition. At the same time, Bismarck tried to dodge the political chaos between the liberals and conservatives over the colonial issue internally. Therefore, he used colonial issue as a political and diplomatic leverage to achieve his goals.
    Unfortunately, Bismarck failed to create a system to secure German Empire internally and externally. Since he was an exceptional politician, he could use this leverage effectively and efficiently. That is, German colonial policy as well as other major policies was controlled by Bismarck himself rather than a system.
    When Wilhelm II became a Kaiser, personally operated Bismarck system could not work. As a man of his own world view, Wilhelm II was a dangerous man at the dangerous time. Wilhelm II discarded Bismarck's policy of gradual and careful colonial expansion. He proclaimed the beginning of 'Der neue Kurs' to escape from the Bismarck's past. He adopted Weltpolitik as a tool of der neue Kurs. Weltpolitik was a policy to promote tension among the Powers to shift the balance of power. Doing so, he believed that Germany could secure the benefits.
    The first place to apply the Weltpolitik was in Korea. During the Sino-Japanese War, Berlin tried to shift the balance of power in Asia. Berlin secured the first colony in Asia in Chiaochao Bay in Shantung through the Triple Intervention. This short-term success became the poison for the future of German Empire. Wilhelm II continued this policy during the Russo-Japanese War and failed. Still, he did not give up and applied same policy in Africa that resulted the World War I.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이영관, "조선과 독일" 국학자료원 2002

    2 Wright, Harrison M., "The “New Imperialism”: Analysis of Late-Nineteenth-Century Expansion" D.C. Heath and Co. 1976

    3 Pflanze, Otto., "The Unification of Germany, 1848-1871" Rinehart and Winston 1968

    4 Taylor, A.J.P., "The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848-1918" Oxford Univ. Press 1954

    5 Townsend, Mary Evelyn., "The Rise and Fall of Germany’s Colonial Empire, 1884-1918" Univ. of California 1966

    6 Bee, Minge C., "The Peterhof Agreement" 20 : 231-250, 1937

    7 Wertheimer, Mildred S., "The Pan-German League, 1890-1914" Octagon Books 1971

    8 Lee, Dwight E., "The Outbreak of the First World War: Who or What was Responsible" D.C. heath and Com. 1958

    9 Kohn, Hans., "The Mind of Germany: The Education of a Nation" Harper Torchbooks 1960

    10 William II., "The Kaiser’s Memoirs" Harper and Brothers Publishers

    1 이영관, "조선과 독일" 국학자료원 2002

    2 Wright, Harrison M., "The “New Imperialism”: Analysis of Late-Nineteenth-Century Expansion" D.C. Heath and Co. 1976

    3 Pflanze, Otto., "The Unification of Germany, 1848-1871" Rinehart and Winston 1968

    4 Taylor, A.J.P., "The Struggle for Mastery in Europe, 1848-1918" Oxford Univ. Press 1954

    5 Townsend, Mary Evelyn., "The Rise and Fall of Germany’s Colonial Empire, 1884-1918" Univ. of California 1966

    6 Bee, Minge C., "The Peterhof Agreement" 20 : 231-250, 1937

    7 Wertheimer, Mildred S., "The Pan-German League, 1890-1914" Octagon Books 1971

    8 Lee, Dwight E., "The Outbreak of the First World War: Who or What was Responsible" D.C. heath and Com. 1958

    9 Kohn, Hans., "The Mind of Germany: The Education of a Nation" Harper Torchbooks 1960

    10 William II., "The Kaiser’s Memoirs" Harper and Brothers Publishers

    11 Wilson, Lawrence., "The Imperial Kaiser: A Portrait of William II" Dorset Press, 1963

    12 Dawson, William H., "The German Empire, 1871-1914 and the Unity Movement" Archon Books 1966

    13 Cecil, Lamar., "The German Diplomatic Service, 1871-1914" Princeton Univ. Press 1976

    14 Smith Woodruff D., "The German Colonial Empire" Univ. of North Carolina Press 1978

    15 Cunliffe, Marcus., "The Age of Expansion, 1848-1917" G&C Merriam Co. 1974

    16 Hobsbawm, Eric J., "The Age of Empire, 1875-1914" Pantheon Books 1987

    17 Henderson, William Otto., "Studies in German Colonial History" F. Cass 1962

    18 Duff, Mountstuart E. Grant., "Studies in European Politics" Kennikat Press 1866

    19 Bee, Minge C., "Origins of German Far Eastern Policy" 21 : 65-97, 1938

    20 Schumpeter, Joseph., "Imperialism: Social Classes" New American Library 1951

    21 Arendt, Hannah, "Imperialism, Harcourt" Brace & World, Inc. 1951

    22 Schrecker, John E., "Imperialism and Chinese Nationalism: Germany in Shantung" Harvard Univ. Press 1971

    23 Lichtheim, George., "Imperialism" Praeger Publishers 1971

    24 Rosenberg, Arthur., "Imperial Germany: The Birth of the German Republic, 1871-1918" Beacon Press 1964

    25 Rich, Norman., "Great Power Diplomacy, 1814-1914" McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1992

    26 Geiss, Imanuel., "German Foreign Policy, 1871-1914" Routledge and Kegan Paul 1976

    27 Dugdale E.T.S., "German Diplomatic Documents, 1871-1914, vol. 3" Harper and Brothers, Publishers 1928

    28 Brandenburg, Erich., "From Bismarck to the World War: A History of German Foreign Policy, 1870-1914" Oxford Univ. Press 1933

    29 "Die Grosse Politik der Europäschen Kabinette, 1871-1914" Berlin 1924

    30 Wehler, Hans-Ulrich., "Bismarck’s Imperialism, 1862-1890" (48) : 119-155, 1970

    31 Hartmann, Frederick H., "Basic Documents of International Relations, Westport" Greenwood Press. Publishers 1951

    32 Lensen, George A., "Balance of Intrigue: International Rivalry in Korea and Manchuria, 1884-1889" Univ. of Florida Press 1982

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-07-01 학회명변경 한글명 : 해외민족연구소 -> 중앙사학연구소
    영문명 : Division for Foreign National Policy -> Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University
    KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.83 0.83 0.74
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.63 0.65 1.075 0.18
    더보기
    해외이동버튼