RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털 사진에서 비수정사진과 수정사진의 예술적 가치 연구 = A Study for the Artistic Value of the Direct Photograph and the Manipulated Photograph in Digital Photography

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45041453

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Photography is engaged with public art with a digital technology. Most photographers have to learn new techniques and pay expensive costs instead of getting the opportunity of various creative expressions. On the other hand, we can find that there is more importance for stimulative visualization rather than rely upon the basis of artistic philosophy from recently presented digital photographic art works. Therefore it is time that we should consider and prepare a suitable standard of appraisal of artistic value in our digital era today. I intend to find the yardstick and the ways of appraisal of artistic value in this area, and to provide a basis of creative artistic philosophy for photographers in this digital period. Through this research, I hope to establish the following : Methodology: This research is divided into two stages. In the first stage, I analyse the value of the Manipulated Photograph and the D irect Photograph with quotations from artists and a defined terminology of photography as a subjective research. In the second stage, I will experiment with visual and sensual reaction of photographers toward the Manipulated Photograph, together with the opinion of a specimen group of 13 professional photographers, after showing them four sample pictures of Direct Photographs and Manipulated Photographs as an objective research. I asked myself four questions to develop the research aims. 1. What are the differences of meanings of terminologies between Manipulated photography and Direct photography? 2. What is the relationship between the final work and the intents of the photographer` s decision when confronting the object in digital photography? 3. How can I appraise the artistic value of the manipulated photographs by the computer? 4. What is the viewpoint of professional photographers about the artistic value of manipulated photography by such computerised means? However, my main intention is to highlight that digital photography can make a serious art work by photographers who have the same consciousness as an artist working in other mediums.
    번역하기

    Photography is engaged with public art with a digital technology. Most photographers have to learn new techniques and pay expensive costs instead of getting the opportunity of various creative expressions. On the other hand, we can find that there is ...

    Photography is engaged with public art with a digital technology. Most photographers have to learn new techniques and pay expensive costs instead of getting the opportunity of various creative expressions. On the other hand, we can find that there is more importance for stimulative visualization rather than rely upon the basis of artistic philosophy from recently presented digital photographic art works. Therefore it is time that we should consider and prepare a suitable standard of appraisal of artistic value in our digital era today. I intend to find the yardstick and the ways of appraisal of artistic value in this area, and to provide a basis of creative artistic philosophy for photographers in this digital period. Through this research, I hope to establish the following : Methodology: This research is divided into two stages. In the first stage, I analyse the value of the Manipulated Photograph and the D irect Photograph with quotations from artists and a defined terminology of photography as a subjective research. In the second stage, I will experiment with visual and sensual reaction of photographers toward the Manipulated Photograph, together with the opinion of a specimen group of 13 professional photographers, after showing them four sample pictures of Direct Photographs and Manipulated Photographs as an objective research. I asked myself four questions to develop the research aims. 1. What are the differences of meanings of terminologies between Manipulated photography and Direct photography? 2. What is the relationship between the final work and the intents of the photographer` s decision when confronting the object in digital photography? 3. How can I appraise the artistic value of the manipulated photographs by the computer? 4. What is the viewpoint of professional photographers about the artistic value of manipulated photography by such computerised means? However, my main intention is to highlight that digital photography can make a serious art work by photographers who have the same consciousness as an artist working in other mediums.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "Selected Writings John Ruskin" Everyman. 1995

    2 "Di g i t a l Ph o t o g r a p h e r" sHandbook. 2002

    3 "Color Technology for Electronic Images Devices" SPIE PRESS. 1997

    4 "C a p t u r i n g t h e Ima g e" RotoVision. 2001

    5 "20th Century Photography." Taschen. 2001

    6 ". Treasures of British Art." Abbe Ville Press. 1996

    7 ". From Adams to Stieglitz Pioneers of Modern Photography. Aperture." 1990

    1 "Selected Writings John Ruskin" Everyman. 1995

    2 "Di g i t a l Ph o t o g r a p h e r" sHandbook. 2002

    3 "Color Technology for Electronic Images Devices" SPIE PRESS. 1997

    4 "C a p t u r i n g t h e Ima g e" RotoVision. 2001

    5 "20th Century Photography." Taschen. 2001

    6 ". Treasures of British Art." Abbe Ville Press. 1996

    7 ". From Adams to Stieglitz Pioneers of Modern Photography. Aperture." 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기
    해외이동버튼