RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    리온 포이히트방어와 고대인도 드라마의 현대적 수용과 변용 = Lion Feuchtwanger and the modern reception and transfiguration of ancient Indian dramas

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101863416

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Feuchtwanger``s intense preoccupation with India, namely with Indian philosophies, religions and Indian history, included the Indian with the seal, which he greatly admired. He wrote a total of three Indian pieces, two Indian adaptations (“Vasantasena”and “The King and the Dancer”) and an Indian colonial drama (Warren Hastings). Feuchtwanger knew the specifics of the ancient Indian dramas and tried with great dramaturgical sensibility of the old seals, then a German theater in accordance with a new artistic remodel. Feuchtwanger was creative but it was“to have received the gestural richness of the dialogue and not to entirely neglect the poetic charm of many lyric and epic extensions. Without any reason Feuchtwanger had decided on editing just the two Indian dramas. Thanks to a convenient linguistic and philological training, which included studies of Sanskrit, he was able to read the Indian pieces in the original work. But we must not forget that Feuchtwanger``s two Indian operations for the theater are not a new philological transmission that he wanted to add to the existing translations, as he wrote in his introduction to “peace”. Feuchtwanger wanted to prove in his reworking of the Indian pieces“the naive vitality of ancient Indian work. Without a doubt, the world``s sponsoring goals minded Feuchtwanger with his two Indian adaptations from it that he, as the spiritual model for Europe, where just felt doomed and decayed to convey the “wisdom-filled resignation”. These intentions are conveyed in his introduction to “Vasantasena”. Lion Feuchtwanger``s two adaptations are implicit in clear contrast to the nationalist war literature and were not a commitment to listening to the poet``s beauty and humanity.
    번역하기

    Feuchtwanger``s intense preoccupation with India, namely with Indian philosophies, religions and Indian history, included the Indian with the seal, which he greatly admired. He wrote a total of three Indian pieces, two Indian adaptations (“Vasantase...

    Feuchtwanger``s intense preoccupation with India, namely with Indian philosophies, religions and Indian history, included the Indian with the seal, which he greatly admired. He wrote a total of three Indian pieces, two Indian adaptations (“Vasantasena”and “The King and the Dancer”) and an Indian colonial drama (Warren Hastings). Feuchtwanger knew the specifics of the ancient Indian dramas and tried with great dramaturgical sensibility of the old seals, then a German theater in accordance with a new artistic remodel. Feuchtwanger was creative but it was“to have received the gestural richness of the dialogue and not to entirely neglect the poetic charm of many lyric and epic extensions. Without any reason Feuchtwanger had decided on editing just the two Indian dramas. Thanks to a convenient linguistic and philological training, which included studies of Sanskrit, he was able to read the Indian pieces in the original work. But we must not forget that Feuchtwanger``s two Indian operations for the theater are not a new philological transmission that he wanted to add to the existing translations, as he wrote in his introduction to “peace”. Feuchtwanger wanted to prove in his reworking of the Indian pieces“the naive vitality of ancient Indian work. Without a doubt, the world``s sponsoring goals minded Feuchtwanger with his two Indian adaptations from it that he, as the spiritual model for Europe, where just felt doomed and decayed to convey the “wisdom-filled resignation”. These intentions are conveyed in his introduction to “Vasantasena”. Lion Feuchtwanger``s two adaptations are implicit in clear contrast to the nationalist war literature and were not a commitment to listening to the poet``s beauty and humanity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 류용상, "포이히트방어의 초기 역사소설에 나타난 인도사상 -『유대인 쥐스 Jud Süß』를 중심으로-" 한국브레히트학회 (19) : 79-108, 2008

    2 Reif, Wolfgang, "Zivilisationsflucht und literarische Wunschräume. Der exotische Roman im ersten Viertel des 20" Jahrhundert 1975

    3 Hartmann, Horst, "Weimarer Beiträge" 667-693, 1961

    4 Dahlke, Hans, "Schauspiel in drei Akten(vier Bilder)" 1988

    5 Fischer, Johannes Maria, "Orplid I(1924/25)" 68-84, 1925

    6 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Notes on the Historical Novel" 22 (22): 345-347, 1948

    7 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Neue Text. Almach für deutsche Literatur" 407-414, 1963

    8 Kinkel, Tanja, "Naemi, Ester, Raguel und Ja'ala. Väter, Töchter, Machtmenschen und Judentum bei Lion Feuchtwanger" 1998

    9 Kesselmann, Heidemarie, "Literatur für Leser (Lili)" 81-102, 1979

    10 Müller-Funk, Wolfgang, "Literatur als geschichtliches Argument. Zur ästhetischen Konzeption und Geschichtsverarbeitung in Lion Feuchtwangers Romantrilogie Der Wartesaal" 1981

    1 류용상, "포이히트방어의 초기 역사소설에 나타난 인도사상 -『유대인 쥐스 Jud Süß』를 중심으로-" 한국브레히트학회 (19) : 79-108, 2008

    2 Reif, Wolfgang, "Zivilisationsflucht und literarische Wunschräume. Der exotische Roman im ersten Viertel des 20" Jahrhundert 1975

    3 Hartmann, Horst, "Weimarer Beiträge" 667-693, 1961

    4 Dahlke, Hans, "Schauspiel in drei Akten(vier Bilder)" 1988

    5 Fischer, Johannes Maria, "Orplid I(1924/25)" 68-84, 1925

    6 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Notes on the Historical Novel" 22 (22): 345-347, 1948

    7 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Neue Text. Almach für deutsche Literatur" 407-414, 1963

    8 Kinkel, Tanja, "Naemi, Ester, Raguel und Ja'ala. Väter, Töchter, Machtmenschen und Judentum bei Lion Feuchtwanger" 1998

    9 Kesselmann, Heidemarie, "Literatur für Leser (Lili)" 81-102, 1979

    10 Müller-Funk, Wolfgang, "Literatur als geschichtliches Argument. Zur ästhetischen Konzeption und Geschichtsverarbeitung in Lion Feuchtwangers Romantrilogie Der Wartesaal" 1981

    11 Yuill, W. E., "Lion Feuchtwanger: The Man, his Ideas, his Work" 113-129, 1972

    12 Wolf, Rudolf, "Lion Feuchtwanger. Ein König des historischen Romans. Eine Vorbemerkung. In: Lion Feuchtwanger. Werk und Wirkung" 1984

    13 Mann, Heinrich, "Lion Feuchtwanger zum 70" Worte seiner Freunde 1954

    14 Sternburg, Wilhelm von, "Lion Feuchtwanger" 1999

    15 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Jud Süß(Nachwort)" 1982

    16 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Jud Süß (Roman)" 1925

    17 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Gesammelte Werke in Einzelausgaben" 253-334, 1984

    18 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Gesammelte Werke in Einzelausgaben" 638-645, 1984

    19 Berndt, Wolfgang, "Die frühen historischen Romane Lion Feuchtwangers (“Jud Süß”und “Die hässliche Herzogin”)" Eine monographische Studie 1953

    20 Greschat, Hans-Jürgen, "Die Religion der Buddhisten" 1980

    21 Reif, Wolfgang, "Deutsche Literatur. Eine Sozialgeschichte, hrsg. von Horst Albert Glaser" 155-167, 1983

    22 Luckács, Georg, "Der historische Roman" 1956

    23 Berendsohn, Walter, "Der Meister des politischen Romans: Lion Feuchtwanger" 1975

    24 Feuchtwanger, Lion, "Centum Opuscula. Eine Auswahl" 1956

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.26 0.26 0.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.23 0.22 0.582 0.04
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼