RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      American Women's Adoption of Pants and the Changing Definition of Femininity during World War II

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104791456

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Articles from The New York Times and magazines including Consumer Digest, Journal of Home Economics, Scholastic, Time and Woman's Home Companion were analyzed in this study and focused on the following research questions: How did the social situation influence American women's adoption of pants during World War II? How were the social opinions of women's adoption of pants? How did American women's adoption of pants and the social opinions on women's pants represent the process of change in the definition of femininity during World War II? Women were encouraged to wear pants in work places because many women had to work in defense industries and farms. Women had to wear pants during the winter to keep warm in order to conserve oil, rubber, and other materials. In addition, wearing men's clothes became a fashion trend among college women during this period. However, practicality was often not the primary thing alone to consider in women's fashion. Femininity was still important in women's fashion. There were criticisms over the women's adoption of pants. Regulations against pants were imposed on women, while there were women who wanted to dress like ladies even at defense industries. An abrupt change in women's gender roles and the increased adoption of trousers aroused social ambivalence about the traditional definition of femininity. Even though many women returned to their homes after the war, the social demand of practicality in women's day-time clothes during the war offered women the experience of comfort and practicality in pants. These experiences contributed to paving the way for more women to adopt pants and helped establishing a new definition of femininity after the war.
      번역하기

      Articles from The New York Times and magazines including Consumer Digest, Journal of Home Economics, Scholastic, Time and Woman's Home Companion were analyzed in this study and focused on the following research questions: How did the social situation ...

      Articles from The New York Times and magazines including Consumer Digest, Journal of Home Economics, Scholastic, Time and Woman's Home Companion were analyzed in this study and focused on the following research questions: How did the social situation influence American women's adoption of pants during World War II? How were the social opinions of women's adoption of pants? How did American women's adoption of pants and the social opinions on women's pants represent the process of change in the definition of femininity during World War II? Women were encouraged to wear pants in work places because many women had to work in defense industries and farms. Women had to wear pants during the winter to keep warm in order to conserve oil, rubber, and other materials. In addition, wearing men's clothes became a fashion trend among college women during this period. However, practicality was often not the primary thing alone to consider in women's fashion. Femininity was still important in women's fashion. There were criticisms over the women's adoption of pants. Regulations against pants were imposed on women, while there were women who wanted to dress like ladies even at defense industries. An abrupt change in women's gender roles and the increased adoption of trousers aroused social ambivalence about the traditional definition of femininity. Even though many women returned to their homes after the war, the social demand of practicality in women's day-time clothes during the war offered women the experience of comfort and practicality in pants. These experiences contributed to paving the way for more women to adopt pants and helped establishing a new definition of femininity after the war.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Women’s work wear suggested by bureau" The New York Times 10-, 1942

      2 "Women’s uniforms set new style" The New York Times 32-, 1941

      3 "Women’s slacks criticized" The New York Times 14-, 1942

      4 Hawes, E., "Why do you wear what you do?" 69 : 14-15, 1942

      5 "Wears boy friend’s suit when he goes off to war" The New York Times 25-, 1942

      6 "War plants to sell clothing for women" The New York Times 16-, 1945

      7 "War increased bicycle’s popularity among women" The New York Times 16-, 1942

      8 "War brings new trends in fashions and accessories" The New York Times 12-, 1942

      9 "Urge short skirts to save textiles" The New York Times 31-, 1941

      10 Samek, S. M., "Uniformly feminine: The ‘working chic’ of Mainbocher" 20 : 33-44, 1993

      1 "Women’s work wear suggested by bureau" The New York Times 10-, 1942

      2 "Women’s uniforms set new style" The New York Times 32-, 1941

      3 "Women’s slacks criticized" The New York Times 14-, 1942

      4 Hawes, E., "Why do you wear what you do?" 69 : 14-15, 1942

      5 "Wears boy friend’s suit when he goes off to war" The New York Times 25-, 1942

      6 "War plants to sell clothing for women" The New York Times 16-, 1945

      7 "War increased bicycle’s popularity among women" The New York Times 16-, 1942

      8 "War brings new trends in fashions and accessories" The New York Times 12-, 1942

      9 "Urge short skirts to save textiles" The New York Times 31-, 1941

      10 Samek, S. M., "Uniformly feminine: The ‘working chic’ of Mainbocher" 20 : 33-44, 1993

      11 Litoff, J. B., "U.S. women on the home front in World War II" 57 (57): 349-360, 1994

      12 "Trousers no novelty" The New York Times 18-, 1943

      13 "The range finder" 40 : 2-, 1942

      14 Stolberg, B., "The man behind the Times. in: Highlights in the history of the American press" University of Minnesota Press 362-376, 1954

      15 Payne, B., "The history of costume: From ancient Mesopotamia through the twentieth century (2nd ed.)" Harper-Collins Publications Inc. 1992

      16 Warner, P., "The Americanization of fashion: Sportswear, the movies and the 1930s. in: Twentieth-century American fashion" Berg 79-98, 2005

      17 Commager, H. S., "The American mind: An interpretation of American thought and character since the 1880’s" Yale University Press 1950

      18 "Style readjustment seen forced by war" The New York Times 18-, 1941

      19 Valentine, E. R., "Slacks: American women take over another masculine garment" The New York Times 16-17, 1942

      20 "Sees buying habit shift" The New York Times 24-, 1944

      21 "Safe clothes for war workers urged by the women’s bureau" The New York Times 4-, 1942

      22 "Pittsburgh girls win right to trousers" The New York Times 14-, 1942

      23 "Pants" 39 : 18-19, 1942

      24 "New curbs are put on women’s garb" The New York Times 29-, 1943

      25 "Hit order to don slacks" The New York Times 13-, 1942

      26 "Hairbrush still efficacious" The New York Times 18-, 1944

      27 "Girls will be boys" The New York Times 10-, 1940

      28 Kennedy, D. M., "Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929-1945" Oxford University Press 1999

      29 "Ford’s office girls bar slacks, wear frocks “to feel like ladies.”" The New York Times 18-, 1943

      30 "First lady views latest farm togs" The New York Times 15-, 1941

      31 "Femininity will lead spring styles, showing at Los Angeles predicts" The New York Times 16-, 1942

      32 Blake, M., "Fashions in 1943" 35 (35): 73-76, 1943

      33 Arnold, R., "Fashion, desire and anxiety: Image and morality in the 20th century" Rutgers University Press 2001

      34 Jarett, M. B., "Fashion tips for the busy women. in: Consumer Digest" 7-9, 1941

      35 Buckland, S. S., "Fashion as a tool of World War II: A case study supporting the SI Theory" 18 (18): 140-151, 2000

      36 "Editors report women are eager to quit jobs for home after war" The New York Times 20-, 1944

      37 "Durability and style are the features at opening of new college fashion shop" The New York Times 18-, 1943

      38 "Dress men dissent on shorter skirts" The New York Times 20-, 1941

      39 Boris, E., "Desirable dress: Rosies, sky girls, and the politics of appearance" 69 : 123-142, 2006

      40 "Defense inspires women’s garb: Functionalism guides designers" The New York Times 18-, 1941

      41 Meyer, L. D., "Creating G.I. Jane: The regulation of sexuality and sexual behavior in the women’s army corps during World War II" 18 (18): 581-601, 1992

      42 "Court bars women in slacks" The New York Times 13-, 1942

      43 Kaiser, S. B., "Construction of an SI theory of fashion: Part 1. Ambivalence and change" 13 (13): 172-183, 1995

      44 "Colorful styles forecast for war" The New York Times 23-, 1941

      45 "College girls in men’s clothing" 9 : 40-42, 1940

      46 "Chicago urges to permit slacks" The New York Times 24-, 1943

      47 Ewan, S., "Channels of desire: Mass images and the shaping of American consciousness" University of Minnesota Press 1992

      48 Foote, S., "Challenging gender symbols. in: Men and women: Dressing the part" Smithsonian Institution Press 144-157, 1989

      49 "Boy dates girl: Jam session" 41 : 30-31, 1942

      50 "Boston honors China’s first lady following reunion at Wellesley" The New York Times 25-, 1943

      51 Evans, S., "Born for liberty: A history of women in America" Free Press Paperbacks 1997

      52 Foote, S., "Bloomers" 6 : 1-12, 1980

      53 "Be well dressed, it’s safe, U.S. says" The New York Times 26-, 1941

      54 "Apparel makers find curbs liberal" The New York Times 34-, 1943

      55 Mott, F. L., "A history of American magazines: Sketches of 21 magazines, 1905-1930" Harvard University Press 1968

      56 Picken, M. B., "A dictionary of costume and fashion" Dover 1999

      57 O’Neill, W. L., "A democracy at war: America’s fight at home & abroad in World War II" Harvard University Press 1993

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2017 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상(등재유지)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지(등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지(등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정(등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한가정학회지(영문)</br>외국어명 : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN ECOLOGY KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS(등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정(신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼