공산 국가의 두 제도적 특징은 국가소유에 기반을 둔 계획경제와 당-국가이다. 따라서 탈공산화 과정에서 당-국가로부터 경제사회 및 시민사회 등 다양한 사회 영역이 분화된다. 이러한 과...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104112779
한병진 (중앙대학교)
2006
-
Property Rights Reform ; Post-communist State Elites ; State Infras- tructural Power ; Privatization ; Partial Property Rights Reform ; 재산권 재확립정책 ; 탈공산 엘리트 ; 국가 하부구조권력 ; 전면적 사유화 ; 부분적 재산권 재확립 ; Property Rights Reform ; Post-communist State Elites ; State Infras- tructural Power ; Privatization ; Partial Property Rights Reform
KCI등재
학술저널
67-93(27쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드공산 국가의 두 제도적 특징은 국가소유에 기반을 둔 계획경제와 당-국가이다. 따라서 탈공산화 과정에서 당-국가로부터 경제사회 및 시민사회 등 다양한 사회 영역이 분화된다. 이러한 과...
공산 국가의 두 제도적 특징은 국가소유에 기반을 둔 계획경제와 당-국가이다. 따라서 탈공산화 과정에서 당-국가로부터 경제사회 및 시민사회 등 다양한 사회 영역이 분화된다. 이러한 과정에서 탈공산 엘리트는 국가의 공적 기능을 약화시켜 국가의 전략적 자원을 자신에게로 이전하고자 한다. 서유럽 국가건설 과정에서 국가엘리트가 사회로부터 자원을 추출하기 위해 국가제도를 강화시키는 것과는 사뭇 반대되는 양상이다. 이러한 엘리트의 국가약화 전략은 다양한 이행전략에 의해 촉진 혹은 저지될 수 있다. 그 중 하나가 바로 탈공산국가의 재산권 재확립 전략이다. 급격한 사유화 정책은 탈공산 엘리트의 국가약화 전략을 강화시켜 국가 하부구조권력의 약화로 귀결된다. 이와 달리 부분적 재산권 재확립 정책은 국가엘리트의 국가약탈 이해를 약화시켜 시장이행과정에서 하부구조권력의 하락을 막을 수 있다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Party-states and state-owned planned economies characterized the communist states. Because of these institutional roots, economic, political, and civil societies had to be institutionally differentiated from the party-state in the post-communist trans...
Party-states and state-owned planned economies characterized the communist states. Because of these institutional roots, economic, political, and civil societies had to be institutionally differentiated from the party-state in the post-communist transition. In this process, state elites had a strong incentive to weaken state institutions in order to facilitate the transfer of state-owned properties into their private riches. Their strategy to weaken the state was quite in contrast to that of state elites in Western European state-building. Various transition strategies affected post-communist state elites who wished to loot the state. One of them was property rights reform of state-owned properties. A complete privatization encouraged and helped state elites to extract resources from the state and harm its capacity. In particular, it was observed that a rapid downfall of state capacity was attributable to a complete privatization carried out under an imperfect democracy. On the other hand, a partial property rights reform discouraged state elites to prey on the state and helped the state to maintain its administrative capacity throughout the transitional period.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김태환, "탈사회주의 경제개혁에 대한 재산권이론적 접근: 소련, 러시아, 중국의 경험과 북한의 경로" 한국정치학회 37 (37): 219-242, 2003
2 신범식, "체제전환기 러시아 지방정치의 제도화 과정과 엘리트 분화: 권력복합체(power complex)의 형성을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 38 (38): 339-363, 2004
3 정재호, "중국의 중앙-지방 관계론 분권화 개혁의 정치경제" 나남출판 1999
4 김성진, "러시아 지역간 경제격차의 변화(1994-2002): 1인당 지역생산을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 123-143, 2005
5 한병진, "국가 권력의 역동성과 러시아의 시장개혁" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 103-122, 2005
6 Кох, Альфред, "Государство-продавец" 1999
7 Roeder, "the Failure of Soviet Politics" Princeton Princeton University Press 1993
8 International Monetary Fund, "World Economic Outlook" 1998
9 Shleifer,Andrei, "Without a Map" 2000
10 Hellman,Joel, "Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Post-Communist Transitions" 50 (50): 203-234, 1998
1 김태환, "탈사회주의 경제개혁에 대한 재산권이론적 접근: 소련, 러시아, 중국의 경험과 북한의 경로" 한국정치학회 37 (37): 219-242, 2003
2 신범식, "체제전환기 러시아 지방정치의 제도화 과정과 엘리트 분화: 권력복합체(power complex)의 형성을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 38 (38): 339-363, 2004
3 정재호, "중국의 중앙-지방 관계론 분권화 개혁의 정치경제" 나남출판 1999
4 김성진, "러시아 지역간 경제격차의 변화(1994-2002): 1인당 지역생산을 중심으로" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 123-143, 2005
5 한병진, "국가 권력의 역동성과 러시아의 시장개혁" 한국정치학회 39 (39): 103-122, 2005
6 Кох, Альфред, "Государство-продавец" 1999
7 Roeder, "the Failure of Soviet Politics" Princeton Princeton University Press 1993
8 International Monetary Fund, "World Economic Outlook" 1998
9 Shleifer,Andrei, "Without a Map" 2000
10 Hellman,Joel, "Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Post-Communist Transitions" 50 (50): 203-234, 1998
11 Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn, "Whither the Central State? The Regional Sources of Russsia's Stalled Reforms" 2004
12 McKinsey Global Institute, "Unlocking Economic Growth in Russia" 1999
13 Roland, Gerard, "Transition and Economics: Politics, Markets, and Firms. Cambridge" 2000
14 EBRD, "Transition Report 1999: Ten Years of Transition" European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1999
15 EBRD, "Transition Report 1997" European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1997
16 Walder, "The Quiet Revolution from Within: Economic Reform as a Source of Political Decline" 1995a
17 Shirk,Susan, "The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China" University of California Press 1993
18 Berglof, Erik, "The New Political Economy of Russia" MIT Press 2003
19 Nagy, Piroska Mohacsi, "The Meltdown of the Russian State: the Deformation and Collapse of the State in Russia" Edward Elgar Pub 2000
20 Polanyi,Karl, "The Great Transformation:The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time" Bacon Press 1965
21 Alexeev, "The Effect of Privatization on Wealth Distribution in Russia" 7 (7): 449-465, 1999
22 Weingast, "The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market Preserving Federalism and Economic Development" 11 (11): 1-31, 1995
23 Mann, "The Autonomous Power of the State States in History" Basil Blackwell Ltd 1986
24 Woo, "The Art of Reforming Centrally Planned Economies Journal of Comparative Economics 18" 276-308, 1994
25 Solnick, teven, "Stealing the State: Control and Collapse in Soviet Institutions" Harvard University Press 1998
26 Sakwa, Richard, "Soviet Politics in Perspective" Routledge 1998
27 Jowitt,Kenneth, "Soviet Neotraditionalism:The Political Corruption of a Leninist Regime" 35 (35): 275-67, 1983
28 Hellman, "Seize the State, Seize the Day, State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition Economics" 2000
29 Black, "Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?" 52 : 1731-1808, 2000
30 "Russian Economic Trends" Blackwell Publishing 7 (7): 1998
31 "Russian Economic Trends" Blackwell Publishing 11 (11): 2002
32 Gaddy, Clifford G, "Russia's Virtual Economy" 77 (77): 53-67, 1998
33 Ledeneva,Alena V, "Russia's Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Exchanges" Cambridge University Press 1998
34 Oi,Jean C, "Rural China Takes Off" University of California Press 1999
35 Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn, "Retrenchment and Reform in Post-Soviet Russia" 2003
36 Che,Jiahua, "Rent Seeking and Government Ownership of Firms: An Application to China's Township-Village Enterprises" 30 (30): 787-811, 2002
37 Yang,Dali L, "Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China" Stanford University Press 2004
38 Sun, Yan, "Reform, State, and Corruption: Is Corruption Less Destructive in China Than in Russia?" 32 (32): 1-20, 1999
39 Gallagher, Mary E., "Reform and Openness: Why China's Economic Reforms Have Delayed Democracy" 54 (54): 338-372, 2002
40 Grzymala-Busse, "Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism" 30 (30): 529-554, 2002
41 Schamis, Hector E, "Re-forming the State:the Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe" the University of Michigan Press 2002
42 Jean C, "Property Rights and Economic Reform in China" Standard University Press 1999
43 Wank, David, "Producing Property Rights: Strategis, Networks, and Efficiency in Urban China's Nonstate Firms" Standard University Press 1999
44 Boycko, "Privatizing Russia" MIT Press 1995
45 Ganev, Venelin I, "Postcommunism as a Historical Episode of State-Building: a Reversed Tillyan Perspective" 2001
46 Pierson, Paul, "Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton" Princeton Princeton University Press 2004
47 Urban, Michael, "Politics and Communism: Figure and Ground" 1997
48 Huntington,Samuel D, "Political Order in Changing Societies" Yale University Press 1968
49 Willerton,John P, "Patronage and Politics in the USSR" Cambridge University Press 1992
50 Nee, "Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition and Mixed Economy in China" 1-27, 1992
51 OECD, "OECD Economic Surveys: Russian Federation" 2000
52 OECD, "OECD Economic Surveys: Russian Federation" 2001
53 Woodruff, David, "Money Unmade: Barter and the Fate of Russian Capitalism" Cornell University Press 1999
54 Walder, Andrew G, "Local Governments as Industrial Firms: An Organizational Analysis of China's Transitional Economy" 101 (101): 263-301, 1995b
55 Rutland, Peter, "Introduction: Business and the State in Russia" 2001
56 Sonin, Konstantin, "Inequality, Property Rights, and Economic Growth in Transition Economics: Theory and Russian Evidence" 1999
57 Naughton, "Growing Out of the Plan: Chinese Economic Reform, 1978-1993" Cambridge University Press 1995
58 Shevtsova, "From Yeltsin to Putin: The Evolution of Presidential Power" 2001
59 Oi,Jean C, "Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporation in China" 45 (45): 99-126, 1992
60 Montinola, Gabriella, "Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success" 48 (48): 50-81, 1996
61 Filippov, "Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions" Cambridge University Press 2004
62 Satter, David, "Darkness At Dawn The Rise Of The Russian Criminal State" Yale University Press 2003
63 Manion,Melanie, "Corruption by Design" Harvard University Press 2004
64 Sun,Yan, "Corruption and Market in Contemporary China" Cornell University Press 2004
65 Walder, "Corporate Organization and Local Government Property Rights in China Privatization in Post-Communist and Reforming Communist States" Lynne Rienner Publishers 1994
66 Walder,Andrew, "Communist Neo-Traditionalism" University of California Press 1986
67 Granick,David, "Chinese State Enterprises:A Regional Property Rights Analysis" Chicago University Press 1990
68 Grindle, "Challenging the State: Crisis and Innovation in Latin America and Africa" Cambridge University Press 1996
69 Roberts, Cynthia, "Bringing the Russian State Back In: Explanations of the Derailed Transition to Market Democracy" 31 (31): 477-498, 1999
미국 로스앤젤레스의 지역공동체 참여: 사회경제적 특성과 사회적 자본과의 관계를 중심으로
남북예멘의 국력과 통일과의 상관성 연구: 통합이론의 적용
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-12-01 | 등재 | 등재후보로 하락 (기타) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.39 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.4 | 0.37 | 0.67 | 0.08 |