섭식행동에서 계획된 행동이론과 자기결정이론의 통합 = Integration of The Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-determination Theory in Eating Regulation Nehavior

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The study aimed to test Hagger and Chatzisarantis(2009)'s integration model of the theory of planned behaviour(TPB) and self-determination theory (SDT) in eating regulation behavior. Also Modified mode(competitive model) which som path was changed and public body shape․weight self-focused attention was included instead of PBC was examined. Participants were college female(N=287). As result of model test, Modifed model had a better model fit (χ2 = 18.37(df=12), p=.11, χ2 /df=1.53, GFI=.99, TLI=.97, CFI=.99, RMSEA=.04) than Hagger and Chatzisarantis(2009)'s model(χ2 = 87.25(df=12), p=.000, χ2 /df=7.27, GFI=.92, TLI=.68, CFI=.86, RMSEA=.15). Finally, Implications and limitations were discussed.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

연구는 Hagger와 Chatzisarantis(2009)가 제안한 계획된 행동이론과 자기결정이론의 통합모형을 섭식조절행동을 설명하는 이론적 틀로서 적합한지를 검증하고자 하였다. 아울러 경쟁모형으로 계획된 행동 이론의 구성개념인 지각된 행동통제력을 체형․체중에 대한 공적 자기주의로 대체하고 경로도 수정한 모형을 설정하여 적합도를 평가하였다. 참여자는 여대생 287명이었다. 모형 검증결과, 섭식조절행동을 설명하는데 연구자가 제안한 경쟁모형의 적합도(χ2 = 18.37(df=12), p=.11, χ2 /df=1.53, GFI=.99, TLI=.97, CFI=.99, RMSEA=.04)가 Hagger와 Chatzisarantis의 통합모형보다(χ2 = 87.25(df=12), p=.000, χ2 /df=7.27, GFI=.92, TLI=.68, CFI=.86, RMSEA=.15) 더 좋았다. 마지막으로 이 연구의 의의 및 제한점에 대해서 논의하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이미령, "자기결정이론과 계획된 행동이론을 통합한 동기의 순서적 연계 모형 검증 : 섭식 조절 행동을 중심으로" 경상대학교 대학원 2008

2 이민규, "섭식억제 행동을 예측하는 모형의 검증 : 계획된 행동이론의 수정모형 탐색" 6 (6): 173-190, 2001

3 이민규, "섭식 억제, 사전음식섭취 및 공적자기주의에 따른 음식섭취 행동" 6 (6): 209-233, 2000

4 Benita, M. R., "When Are Mastery Goals More Adaptive? It Depends on Experiences of Autonomy Support and Autonomy" 2013

5 Williams, G. C., "Validation of the"Important Other"Climate Questionnaire : Assessing Autonomy Support for Health-Related Change" 24 (24): 179-194, 2006

6 Grønhøj, A. B. L., "Using theory of planned behavior to predict healthy eating among Danish adolescents" 113 (113): 4-17, 2013

7 Deci, E. L., "The"what"and"why"of goal pursuits : Human needs and the self-determination of behavior" 11 : 227-268, 2000

8 Povey, R., "The theory of planned behaviour and health eating : Examining additive and moderating effects of social influence variables" 14 : 991-1006, 1999

9 Conner, M., "The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating" 21 (21): 194-201, 2002

10 Ajzen, I., "The theory of planned behavior" 50 : 179-211, 1991

11 Payne, N., "The role of perceived need within the theory of planned behaviour : a comparison of exercise and healthy eating" 9 (9): 489-504, 2004

12 Hagger, M. S., "The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings(PASSES) : Development, validity, and cross-cultural invariance in young people" 8 (8): 632-653, 2007

13 Payne, N., "The impact of job strain on the predictive validity of the theory of planned behaviour : an investigation of exercise and healthy eating" 10 (10): 115-131, 2005

14 Williams, G. C., "Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation : Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial" 25 (25): 91-101, 2006

15 Hagger, M., "Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity : A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations" 24 (24): 689-711, 2009

16 Trafimow, D., "Some tests of the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs" 34 : 378-397, 1998

17 Ryan, R. M., "Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization : Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains" 57 : 749-761, 1989

18 Wilson, P. M., "On the nature and function of scoring protocols used in exercise motivation research : An empirical study of the behavioral regulation in exercise questionnaire" 13 (13): 614-622, 2012

19 Williams, G. C., "Motivational Predictors of Weight Loss and Weight-Loss Maintenance" 70 (70): 115-126, 1996

20 Hagger, M. S., "Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour : a meta-analysis" 14 (14): 275-302, 2009

21 Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., "Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior" 37 (37): 934-954, 2007

22 Rouse, P. C. N., "In the beginning: Role of autonomy support on the motivation, mental health and intentions of participants entering an exercise referral scheme" 26 (26): 729-749, 2011

23 Hagger, M. S., "From Psychological Need Satisfaction to Intentional Behavior : Testing a Motivational Sequence in Two Behavioral Contexts" 32 : 131-148, 2006

24 Paisley, C. M., "Expectations of reducing fat intake:The role of perceived need within the theory of planned behaviour" 13 : 341-353, 1998

25 Armitage, C. J., "Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour : A meta-analytic review" 40 : 471-499, 2001

26 Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., "Effects of an intervention based on self-determination theory on self-reported leisure-time physical activity participation" 24 (24): 29-48, 2009

27 Webb, T. L., "Does Changing Behavioral Intentions Engender Behavior Change? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence" 132 (132): 249-268, 2006

28 Ajzen, I., "Correspondence between health attitudes and behavior" 7 : 259-276, 1986

29 Chiang, E. S., "Assessment of Parent Orientation towards Autonomy vs. Control in Promoting Children's Healthy Eating and Exercise" 4 (4): 202-217, 2012

30 Edmunds, J., "Adherence and well-being in overweight and obese patients referred to an exercise on prescription scheme : A self-determination theory perspective" 8 (8): 722-740, 2007

31 Vallerand, R. J., "A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for sport and physical activity, In self determination theory in exercise and sport" Human Kinetics 255-280, 2007