노동시장의 유연성과 실업급여 동질화의 국제비교연구:독일, 프랑스, 네덜란드를 중심으로 = Labour Market Flexibility and Unemployment Benefit Homogenization: a Comparative Study of Netherlands, Germany and France

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Flexible labour market requires a fundamental reworking of the institutional structures through which unemployment protection was traditionally organized. This process of institutional change can be called ‘triple integration’. The first of these is unemployment homogenization. It means the process whereby the level and the duration of entitlement to unemployment benefits tend to become less dependent on previous labour market achievements and positions than in the past. But the reality is so different from the requirement of labour market flexibility. Some governments adapted unemployment protection to new circumstances but others did not. This paper tried to analyze why some governments of Netherlands, Germany and France attempted progressive recalibration or did reactionary one.
This case study shows following results. While Netherlands has made significant revisions of their systems of unemployment protection much earlier, this has been far from the case in France and Germany. Germany experienced the reform of the existing unemployment protection system in 2005 and France made revision in 2008. The case provides evidence for the impact of institutional constraints, trade union and the autonomy of state.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 심창학, "연금 및 실업보험을 통한 비정규직 근로자 사회보호 : 덴마크와 프랑스 사례를 중심으로" 사회복지연구소 22 : 169-201, 2009

2 Visser Jelle, "the first part-time economy in the world does it work?" Amsterdam institute for advanced labour studies university of amsterdam 2000

3 Vis Barbara, "When Do Government Increase Spending on Active Labour Market Policies? A FsQCA Analysis of Labour Market Reforms in 18 Countries, 1985-2003" 1985

4 Benassi, C., "Union strategies towards temporary agency workers" 2013

5 Esping-Andersen G., "The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism" Oxford 1990

6 Hausermann Silja, "The Politics of employment-friendly welfare reforms in post-industrial economies" 6 : 559-586, 2008

7 Saint-Paul, G., "The Political Economy of Employment Protection" 110 (110): 2002

8 Hoogenboom Maecel, "The Netherlands: two tires for all" 2011

9 Palier Bruno, "The Long Conservative Corporatist Road to Welfare Reforms, In Long Gooodbye to Bismarck?" Amsterdam University Press 2010

10 Clegg, Daniel., "Solidarity or dualization? Social governance, union preferences and unemployment benefit adjustment in Belgium and France, In The Age of Dualization, The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies" 2011

11 Rueda David, "Social Democracy and Active Labour-Market Policies: Insiders, Outsicers and the Politics of Employment Promotion" 36 : 2006

12 Clasen, Jochen, "Regulating the Risk of Unemployment" Oxford 2011

13 Ebbinghaus, "Reforming Bismarckian Corporatism: The Changing Role of Social Partnership in Continental Europe" Harvard University 2006

14 Picot Georg., "Politics of Segmentation" Routledge 2012

15 Clasen, Jochen., "Paying the Jobless" Avebury 1994

16 Iversen, T., "Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation" 41 : 600-637, 2008

17 Clasen, Jochen, "New labour market risks and the revision of unemployment protection systems in Europe, In The Politics of the Post-Industrial Welfare State" Routledge 192-210, 2006

18 Van der Veen, "Managed Liberalization of the Dutch Welfare State: A Review and Analysis of the Reform of the Dutch Social Security System, 1985– 1998" 12 (12): 1998

19 Leschke, J., "Is it useful to cluster countries? Analysis on the example of unemployment insurance coverage of non-standard employed" 2005

20 Rueda David, "Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties" 99 (99): 2005

21 Dingeldey, Irene, "Germany: moving towards integration whilst maintaining segmentation" 2011

22 Vail, Mark I., "From ‘welfare without work’ to ‘buttressed liberalization’: The shifting dynamics of labour market adjustment in France and Germany" 47 : 2007

23 Clegg, Daniel, "From liberal statism to statist liberalism; the transformation of unemployment policy in Europe, In Welfare State Transformations" Palgrave 2008

24 Clegg, Daniel., "France: integration versus dualization, In Jochen Clasen and Daniel Clegg" 2011

25 Clasen, Jochen, "Exit Bismarck, enter dualism?" 40 (40): 795-810, 2011

26 MISEP, "European Employment Observatory. Basic Information Report" 2003

27 Pierson Paul., "Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment" Cambridge University Press 1994

28 Davidsson B. J, "Defending the organisation, not the members: Unions and the Reform of job security legislation in Western Europe" 2012

29 Huo, J. J., "Decommodification and activation in social democratic Policy: resolving the Paradox" 18 (18): 2008

30 Clegg, Daniel., "Continental Drift: On Unemployment Policy Change in Bismarckian Welfare States" Blackwell 2008

31 Clasen, Jochen, "Beyond activation: reforming unemployment protection systems in post-industrial labour markets" 8 (8): 555-581, 2006

32 Leschke, J., "Are unemployment insurance systems in Europe adapting to news risks arising from non-standard employment?" Universite Libre de Bruxelles 1-40, 2007