RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      배아연구와 인간존엄 = Human Dignity and Embryo Research

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82315236

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Before bioethics concerning embryo research began to be discussed, the concrete content of the human dignity has not been so vigorously examined although it is now regarded as one of the main issues in bioethics. Anyone who has opinions about embryo research-whether he argues for or against it-argues on the basis of human dignity. On the other hand, the forms and the degree of embryo protection varies, even if the embryo is protected with the argument of the same human dignity. From these reasons, some questions are raised as follows: whether or not there are universal conceptions of human dignity that anyone can agree with; even so, whether or not there are another factors of human dignity that are able to change according to the community and its culture. To find the answer to above questions, this article has the following structure. Firstly, Kant`s End-in-Itself Formula and Durig`s Objekt Formula that have been used as the arguments against embryo research are newly re-interpreted. Nevertheless, it is insisted that these formulas can be still employed for the prohibition of embryo research. After that, diverse arguments of human dignity are introduced that have a different content according to each theory. In conclusion, several fundamental conceptions of human dignity are suggested, which are quite persuasive despite the diversity of the arguments. In the last chapter, it is discussed if an embryo can be an bearer of human dignity according to the Constitution. At last, it is discussed that changeable factors in a human dignity exist, by showing how differently regulation policies of each country take in practice-particularly in South Korea and Germany-although they have the same concept of legal interest of human dignity.
      번역하기

      Before bioethics concerning embryo research began to be discussed, the concrete content of the human dignity has not been so vigorously examined although it is now regarded as one of the main issues in bioethics. Anyone who has opinions about embryo r...

      Before bioethics concerning embryo research began to be discussed, the concrete content of the human dignity has not been so vigorously examined although it is now regarded as one of the main issues in bioethics. Anyone who has opinions about embryo research-whether he argues for or against it-argues on the basis of human dignity. On the other hand, the forms and the degree of embryo protection varies, even if the embryo is protected with the argument of the same human dignity. From these reasons, some questions are raised as follows: whether or not there are universal conceptions of human dignity that anyone can agree with; even so, whether or not there are another factors of human dignity that are able to change according to the community and its culture. To find the answer to above questions, this article has the following structure. Firstly, Kant`s End-in-Itself Formula and Durig`s Objekt Formula that have been used as the arguments against embryo research are newly re-interpreted. Nevertheless, it is insisted that these formulas can be still employed for the prohibition of embryo research. After that, diverse arguments of human dignity are introduced that have a different content according to each theory. In conclusion, several fundamental conceptions of human dignity are suggested, which are quite persuasive despite the diversity of the arguments. In the last chapter, it is discussed if an embryo can be an bearer of human dignity according to the Constitution. At last, it is discussed that changeable factors in a human dignity exist, by showing how differently regulation policies of each country take in practice-particularly in South Korea and Germany-although they have the same concept of legal interest of human dignity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이계일, "인간의 존엄은 형량가능한가?" 법학연구소 26 (26): 157-199, 2010

      2 임미원, "생명윤리의 관점에서 본 칸트의 인간존엄의 개념" 한국칸트학회 (19) : 271-298, 2007

      3 고봉진, "생명윤리에서의 인간존엄'개념'의 총체성" 한국법철학회 11 (11): 85-100, 2008

      4 이상돈, "생명공학과 법: 생명의 공학화와 생명문화의 절차적 재생산" 서울 2003

      5 정문식, "독일에서의 인간의 존엄과 생명권의 관계 - 배아줄기세포연구에 있어서 배아의 인간존엄과 생명권 관계를 예로" 한국비교공법학회 7 (7): 265-294, 2006

      6 Ernst, Stephan, "Zwischen Prinzipienmoral und Situationsethik. Konfessionelle Unterschiede in der christlichen Bewertung aktueller bioethischer Fragen?. in: Kriterien biomedizinischer Ethik" Freiburg/Basel/Wien 313-336, 2006

      7 Brownsword, Roger, "What the World Needs Now : Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity. in: Human Rights" Oxford 203-234, 2004

      8 Jonas, Hans, "Technik, Medizin und Ethik" Frankfurt am Main 2003

      9 Dreier, Horst, "Stufungen des vorgeburtlichen Lebensschutzes" ZRP 377-383, 2002

      10 Singer, Oeter, "Praktische Ethik, 2. Auflage" Stuttgart 2008

      1 이계일, "인간의 존엄은 형량가능한가?" 법학연구소 26 (26): 157-199, 2010

      2 임미원, "생명윤리의 관점에서 본 칸트의 인간존엄의 개념" 한국칸트학회 (19) : 271-298, 2007

      3 고봉진, "생명윤리에서의 인간존엄'개념'의 총체성" 한국법철학회 11 (11): 85-100, 2008

      4 이상돈, "생명공학과 법: 생명의 공학화와 생명문화의 절차적 재생산" 서울 2003

      5 정문식, "독일에서의 인간의 존엄과 생명권의 관계 - 배아줄기세포연구에 있어서 배아의 인간존엄과 생명권 관계를 예로" 한국비교공법학회 7 (7): 265-294, 2006

      6 Ernst, Stephan, "Zwischen Prinzipienmoral und Situationsethik. Konfessionelle Unterschiede in der christlichen Bewertung aktueller bioethischer Fragen?. in: Kriterien biomedizinischer Ethik" Freiburg/Basel/Wien 313-336, 2006

      7 Brownsword, Roger, "What the World Needs Now : Techno-Regulation, Human Rights and Human Dignity. in: Human Rights" Oxford 203-234, 2004

      8 Jonas, Hans, "Technik, Medizin und Ethik" Frankfurt am Main 2003

      9 Dreier, Horst, "Stufungen des vorgeburtlichen Lebensschutzes" ZRP 377-383, 2002

      10 Singer, Oeter, "Praktische Ethik, 2. Auflage" Stuttgart 2008

      11 Dreier, Horst, "Menschenwürdegaranie und Schwangerschaftsabbruch" DÖV 1036-1040, 1995

      12 Dreier, Horst, "Menschenwürde aus verfassungsrechtlicher Sicht. in: Marburger Jahrbuch Theologie ⅩⅤⅡ. Menschenwürde" Marburg 167-210, 2005

      13 Geddert-Steinacher, "Menschenwürde als Verfassungsbegriff" Berlin 1990

      14 Birnbacher, Dieter, "Menschenwürde - abwägbar oder unabwägbar?. in: Biomedizin und Menschenwürde" Frankfurt am Main 249-271, 2004

      15 Korff, Wilhelm, "Lexikon der Bioethik, Bd. 1" Gütersloh 2000

      16 Dreier, Horst, "Lebensschutz und Menschenwürde in der bioethischen Diskussion. in: Bioethik und Menschenwürde" Münster 9-50, 2002

      17 Klöpfer, Michael, "Humangentechnik als Verfassungsfrage" JZ 417-428, 2002

      18 Hollenbach, Axel, "Grundrechtsschutz im Arzt-Patienten-Verhältnis" Berlin 2003

      19 Luhmann, Niklas, "Grundrechte als Institution, 5. Auflage" Auflage 2009

      20 Dreier, Horst, "Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Bd. Ⅰ, 2. Auflage" Tübingen 2004

      21 Maunz, Theodor, "Grundgesetz-Kommentar, Bd. 1" München 2009

      22 Birnbacher, Dieter, "Gefährdet die moderne Reproduktionsmedizin die menschliche Würde?. in: Um Leben und Tod" Frankfurt am Main 266-281, 1990

      23 Hoerster, Norbert, "Forum: Kompromisslösungen zum Menschenrecht des Embryos auf Leben?" JuS 529-532, 2003

      24 Benda, Ernst, "Erprobung der Menschenwürde am Beispiel der Humangenetik. in: Genforschung - Fluch oder Segen?" München 205-231, 1985

      25 Hofmann, Hasso, "Die versprochene Menschenwürde" AöR 353-377, 1993

      26 Hilgendorf, Eric, "Die mißbrauchte Menschenwürde" 7 : 137-157, 1999

      27 Neumann, Ulfrid, "Die Tyrannei der Würde. Argumentationstheoretische Erwägungen zum Menschenwürdeprinzip" ARSP 153-166, 1998

      28 Kant, Immanuel, "Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Tugendlehre, Neu herausgegeben von Bernd Ludwig, 2. Auflage" Hamburg 2008

      29 Kant, Immanuel, "Die Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre, Neu herausgegeben von Bernd Ludwig, 3. Auflage" Hamburg 2009

      30 Herdegen, Matthias, "Die Menschenwürde im Fluß des bioethischen Diskurses" JZ 773-779, 2001

      31 Dürig, Günter, "Der Grundrechtssatz von der Menschenwürde" 81 : 117-157, 1956

      32 Ipsen, Joern, "Der "verfassungsrechtliche Status" der Embryos in vitro" JZ 989-996, 2001

      33 Kersten, Jens, "Das Klonen von Menschen" Tübingen 2004

      34 Osterlow, Anne, "Biostrafrecht. Eine neue wissenschatliche Teildisziplin" Berlin 2004

      35 Hilgendorf, Eric, "Biostrafrecht als neue Disziplin?. in: Festschrift für Winfried Brohm" München 387-404, 2002

      36 Keller, Rolf, "Beginn und Stufungen des strafrechtlichen Lebensschutzes. in: Fortpflanzungsmedizin und Humangenetik - Strafrechtlichen Schranken?, 2. Auflage" Tübingen 111-135, 1991

      37 Dreier, Horst, "Bedeutung und systematische Stellung der Menschenwürde im deutschen Gesetz. in: Menschenwürde als Rechtsbegriff (ARSP-Beiheft Nr. 101)" Stuttgart 33-48, 2004

      38 Hoerster, Norbert, "Abtreibung im säkularen Staat. Argumente gegen den" Frankfurt am Main 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.75 0.75 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.7 0.827 0.44
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼