RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    강벌주의 입법과 형사정책 경향에 대한 연구 = A study on the Tendency of Legislation and Criminal Policies Regarding Punitivism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108255001

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The prevailing tendency in today's society as a whole, is to ultimately resort to criminal punishment. There has been a public opinion that severe punishment should be imposed on the offender whenever an antisocial incident occurs, and criminal policy conscious of that pubic opinion has been directed toward imposing severe punishment on the offender. However, there are many criticisms on whether such violent punishment theory actually contributes to the re-socialization of criminals and the safety of society. Considering that criminal punishment has an attribute of harm and is also the most powerful means that the state can impose on individuals, it is self-evident that it must conform to the principle of proportionality. It is also necessary to look back on whether the criminal policy has been successful in an effective sense.
    Crime must be deterred, and it cannot be denied that one of the purposes of punishment is to retaliate against the perpetrator, and that there is a recovery of harm that can be achieved through this. The effect of Threats(menace) given by the severe punishment is also self-evident. However, the criminal punishment should be commensurate with the responsibility of the offender and should not proceed towards a totalitarian criminal law that loses human dignity. The history of mankind, regardless of East and West, has already experienced totalitarian criminal law, and in the midst of it, the substantive truth has been ignored and many innocent people have been executed. Since the right of punishment, which can infringe on a person's life, body, or property, is a very serious power, it must be strictly controlled by the principle of the rule of law and must not be used in a direction contrary to important basic principles such as the principle of responsibility and the principle of proportionality.
    Punitivism is viewed as a tendency that emerged based on hostile criminal law thinking and to strengthen the sense of security based on exaggerated and distorted facts. Judging from a traditional punishment theory standpoint, the aforementioned punitive legislation and criminal policies are against human dignity, the principle of responsibility and proportionality, and run the risk of moving toward totalitarian criminal law. The extension of punishment and the strengthening of punishment may only have the effect of relieving the immediate legal sentiment, rather than being the fundamental solution in terms of social prevention. In the end, there is a high possibility that it will merely end up as ‘Threats(menace) for Threats’, even if we look at the cases of other countries. Therefore, punishment should not be determined based on vague criteria such as public opinion or legal sentiment. Moreover, criminal legislation should be implemented through a detailed review in line with the teleological aspects of general prevention and special prevention that conform to the principle of thorough accountability and proportionality.
    In this paper, we will examine the trend of punitivism widely spreading in recent criminal policies and the corresponding punishment theory.
    번역하기

    The prevailing tendency in today's society as a whole, is to ultimately resort to criminal punishment. There has been a public opinion that severe punishment should be imposed on the offender whenever an antisocial incident occurs, and criminal policy...

    The prevailing tendency in today's society as a whole, is to ultimately resort to criminal punishment. There has been a public opinion that severe punishment should be imposed on the offender whenever an antisocial incident occurs, and criminal policy conscious of that pubic opinion has been directed toward imposing severe punishment on the offender. However, there are many criticisms on whether such violent punishment theory actually contributes to the re-socialization of criminals and the safety of society. Considering that criminal punishment has an attribute of harm and is also the most powerful means that the state can impose on individuals, it is self-evident that it must conform to the principle of proportionality. It is also necessary to look back on whether the criminal policy has been successful in an effective sense.
    Crime must be deterred, and it cannot be denied that one of the purposes of punishment is to retaliate against the perpetrator, and that there is a recovery of harm that can be achieved through this. The effect of Threats(menace) given by the severe punishment is also self-evident. However, the criminal punishment should be commensurate with the responsibility of the offender and should not proceed towards a totalitarian criminal law that loses human dignity. The history of mankind, regardless of East and West, has already experienced totalitarian criminal law, and in the midst of it, the substantive truth has been ignored and many innocent people have been executed. Since the right of punishment, which can infringe on a person's life, body, or property, is a very serious power, it must be strictly controlled by the principle of the rule of law and must not be used in a direction contrary to important basic principles such as the principle of responsibility and the principle of proportionality.
    Punitivism is viewed as a tendency that emerged based on hostile criminal law thinking and to strengthen the sense of security based on exaggerated and distorted facts. Judging from a traditional punishment theory standpoint, the aforementioned punitive legislation and criminal policies are against human dignity, the principle of responsibility and proportionality, and run the risk of moving toward totalitarian criminal law. The extension of punishment and the strengthening of punishment may only have the effect of relieving the immediate legal sentiment, rather than being the fundamental solution in terms of social prevention. In the end, there is a high possibility that it will merely end up as ‘Threats(menace) for Threats’, even if we look at the cases of other countries. Therefore, punishment should not be determined based on vague criteria such as public opinion or legal sentiment. Moreover, criminal legislation should be implemented through a detailed review in line with the teleological aspects of general prevention and special prevention that conform to the principle of thorough accountability and proportionality.
    In this paper, we will examine the trend of punitivism widely spreading in recent criminal policies and the corresponding punishment theory.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 배종대, "형법총론" 홍문사 2013

    2 이재석, "형법의 重罰化 입법경향에 관한 비판적 고찰" 한국법학회 (44) : 199-224, 2011

    3 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2013

    4 윤영철, "프란츠 폰 리스트(Franz von Liszt)의 형법관에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 36 (36): 1035-1064, 2016

    5 오영근, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 폐지의 당위성" 한국형사정책학회 17 (17): 33-53, 2005

    6 김잔디, "특별예방을 위한 일부집행유예제도의 도입 가능성" 대검찰청 (64) : 257-287, 2019

    7 김태명, "최근 우리나라의 중벌주의 입법경향에 대한 비판" 한국형사법학회 24 (24): 121-155, 2012

    8 김성돈, "책임형법의 위기와 예방형법의 한계" 한국형사법학회 22 (22): 3-31, 2010

    9 안나현, "중형주의적 형벌정책에 관한 비판적 연구" 법학연구원 23 (23): 303-333, 2016

    10 김호기, "전통적 책임주의에 대한 현대적 도전 - 특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착제도 도입이 가지는 의미 -" 한국형사법학회 21 (21): 199-222, 2009

    1 배종대, "형법총론" 홍문사 2013

    2 이재석, "형법의 重罰化 입법경향에 관한 비판적 고찰" 한국법학회 (44) : 199-224, 2011

    3 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2013

    4 윤영철, "프란츠 폰 리스트(Franz von Liszt)의 형법관에 대한 고찰" 법학연구소 36 (36): 1035-1064, 2016

    5 오영근, "특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률 폐지의 당위성" 한국형사정책학회 17 (17): 33-53, 2005

    6 김잔디, "특별예방을 위한 일부집행유예제도의 도입 가능성" 대검찰청 (64) : 257-287, 2019

    7 김태명, "최근 우리나라의 중벌주의 입법경향에 대한 비판" 한국형사법학회 24 (24): 121-155, 2012

    8 김성돈, "책임형법의 위기와 예방형법의 한계" 한국형사법학회 22 (22): 3-31, 2010

    9 안나현, "중형주의적 형벌정책에 관한 비판적 연구" 법학연구원 23 (23): 303-333, 2016

    10 김호기, "전통적 책임주의에 대한 현대적 도전 - 특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착제도 도입이 가지는 의미 -" 한국형사법학회 21 (21): 199-222, 2009

    11 귄터야콥스, "시민형법과 적대형법" 전북대학교 법학연구소 29 : 2009

    12 정지혜, "성범죄의 엄벌화와 관련한 비교법적 연구 - 일본의 성범죄관련 형사입법 개정을 중심으로 -" 동북아법연구소 12 (12): 367-387, 2018

    13 하태훈, "법치국가에서의 형법과 형사소송법의 과제 - 최근 형사 관련법 개정경향을 중심으로 -" 법학연구원 (62) : 19-51, 2011

    14 법무부, "범죄백서" 법무연수원 2020

    15 조상제, "국가형벌의 목적과 책임의 기능적 구성" 한국형사법학회 12 : 1999

    16 이덕인, "강벌주의 형사제재에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 성범죄 처벌과 재범방지정책을 중심으로 -" 한국형사법학회 23 (23): 261-284, 2011

    17 김일수, "Punitivistische Grundtendenzen der gegenwärtigen Kriminalpolitik?" 법학연구원 (56) : 513-548, 2010

    18 김일수, "Das Liebesstrafrecht hinterm Berge des Feindstrafrechts" 고려대학교 법학연구원 49 : 2007

    19 E. Weitekamp, "Amerikanische Strafrechtspolitik auf dem Weg in die Katastrophe" 한국형사정책연구원 32 : 1995

    20 김용수, "30년간 성범죄의 변화 — 성폭력범죄 관련 형사제재 규정의 변화를 중심으로 —" 법학연구원 27 (27): 1-29, 2017

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.71 0.71 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.63 0.6 0.679 0.46
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼