RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      국내 주요신문에 투영된 PR/홍보 의 이미지 변화에 관한 연구 : 1990년과 2000년을 중심으로 = The Shifting Portrayal of Public Relations in Korean Newspapers : A Comparison of 1990 and 2000 Articles containing the word PR

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30110729

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study examined how the portrayal of PR has changed over the last tens years or so in the major newspapers in Korea. We analyzed whether there was a shift in how PR was reported in the newspapers between 1990 and 2000. We also examined whether the portrayal of PR was different depending on whether the PR was for the government sector or for the private sector. For this purpose, we content analyzed the tone of the articles that contained the keyword PR that appeared in three major newspapers(Chosun, Joongang, and Donga) into either negative, neutral, or positive. The results showed that the number of articles containing the word PR significantly increased from 152 in 1990 to 355 in 2000. As expected, the tone of the articles became significantly more positive in 2000. In 1990, only 14.47% had a positive tone about PR while 29.86% of the articles in 2000 were positive. In addition, recent articles tend to treat more corporate-related PR news than government PR. In 1990, 78.95% of the articles were about government PR. In contrast, 60.27% of the 2000 articles were about private companies. Practical implications of the results are offered.
      번역하기

      This study examined how the portrayal of PR has changed over the last tens years or so in the major newspapers in Korea. We analyzed whether there was a shift in how PR was reported in the newspapers between 1990 and 2000. We also examined whether the...

      This study examined how the portrayal of PR has changed over the last tens years or so in the major newspapers in Korea. We analyzed whether there was a shift in how PR was reported in the newspapers between 1990 and 2000. We also examined whether the portrayal of PR was different depending on whether the PR was for the government sector or for the private sector. For this purpose, we content analyzed the tone of the articles that contained the keyword PR that appeared in three major newspapers(Chosun, Joongang, and Donga) into either negative, neutral, or positive. The results showed that the number of articles containing the word PR significantly increased from 152 in 1990 to 355 in 2000. As expected, the tone of the articles became significantly more positive in 2000. In 1990, only 14.47% had a positive tone about PR while 29.86% of the articles in 2000 were positive. In addition, recent articles tend to treat more corporate-related PR news than government PR. In 1990, 78.95% of the articles were about government PR. In contrast, 60.27% of the 2000 articles were about private companies. Practical implications of the results are offered.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-06-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Public Relations Research -> Journal of Public Relations KCI등재
      2014-03-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국홍보학회 -> 한국PR학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.55 1.55 1.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.72 1.71 2.371 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼