RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      일본의 “산업 클러스터 계획 프로젝트”의 특징 및 시사점: TAMA산업활성화협회의 운영 사례를 중심으로 = The Characteristics and Current Issues of "TAMA Cluster Management" in Japan: A Case Study of TAMA Management

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104272455

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The similar point of the 19 regional industrial clusters of Japan is that all of the clusters are not limited to an administrational district but rather covers a larger area. When a cluster covers a larger area, there is problem of acquiring responsible businesses and interactive planing. In order to overcome such a problem, private coordinating organizations have been installed and operated to connect and manage inter-activities of industries, universities, and research institutes. TAMA, a private coordinating organization, differs from other associations in a way that it does not deal with one specific field or business. TAMA rather dealswith various product-developing small to middle size companies by offering strategic support for the development of new technologies and expansion of new businesses. Product-developing small to middle size companies comparatively have their own abilities for technological development and marketing which is quite different from other subcontract companies and their relations to large corporations. In such aspect, product-developing companies are actually similar to large corporations with competitiveness in the world market.
      번역하기

      The similar point of the 19 regional industrial clusters of Japan is that all of the clusters are not limited to an administrational district but rather covers a larger area. When a cluster covers a larger area, there is problem of acquiring responsib...

      The similar point of the 19 regional industrial clusters of Japan is that all of the clusters are not limited to an administrational district but rather covers a larger area. When a cluster covers a larger area, there is problem of acquiring responsible businesses and interactive planing. In order to overcome such a problem, private coordinating organizations have been installed and operated to connect and manage inter-activities of industries, universities, and research institutes. TAMA, a private coordinating organization, differs from other associations in a way that it does not deal with one specific field or business. TAMA rather dealswith various product-developing small to middle size companies by offering strategic support for the development of new technologies and expansion of new businesses. Product-developing small to middle size companies comparatively have their own abilities for technological development and marketing which is quite different from other subcontract companies and their relations to large corporations. In such aspect, product-developing companies are actually similar to large corporations with competitiveness in the world market.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "TAMA(?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?Hj?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HY??Hy?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HA?Hg" 02-, 2002.

      2 "?Hu??H?H??H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hi?HJ??H^?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??HV?HK?HY?H?H?Hn?Ho?H?H?Hn?H?H???H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?" 1998

      3 "?HZ?Hp?Hv?HV?HI?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H`?H?H?H?H?H?H?HW?H]" 2004

      4 "?HZ?Hp?Hv?HV?HI?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H`?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hg?H?H" 2003.

      5 "?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HJ??H^?HW?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H" 2001

      6 "?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HJ??H^?HW?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H" 2001

      7 "?HY?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H?H?Hj?H^?H?H?H?H?HO?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H" 2005

      8 "?HY?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^???H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H" 2005

      9 "?HY??HA?Hg?H?H???H?H??H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?Hv?H?H?H?H?H?H?HF?H?H?H{?H?H?HC?Hm?Hx??HV?H?H?H?H?HV?HX?He?H?H?H?H?Hv?H?H??H?H?H?H?HC?H?H?Hv?H?H?HP??HV?H?H?H?H" 2003

      10 "?HV?HY?H?H?Hn?Ho??H?H?Hv??HiTAMA ?H?H?H?H?H?H5?H?H?HN?Hv??Hj" 2003

      1 "TAMA(?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?Hj?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HY??Hy?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HA?Hg" 02-, 2002.

      2 "?Hu??H?H??H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hi?HJ??H^?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??HV?HK?HY?H?H?Hn?Ho?H?H?Hn?H?H???H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?" 1998

      3 "?HZ?Hp?Hv?HV?HI?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H`?H?H?H?H?H?H?HW?H]" 2004

      4 "?HZ?Hp?Hv?HV?HI?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H`?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hg?H?H" 2003.

      5 "?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HJ??H^?HW?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H" 2001

      6 "?HZ?Hp?H?H?Hi?H?H?Hs??Hn?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?HJ??H^?HW?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H" 2001

      7 "?HY?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H?H?Hj?H^?H?H?H?H?HO?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H" 2005

      8 "?HY?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^???H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H" 2005

      9 "?HY??HA?Hg?H?H???H?H??H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?Hv?H?H?H?H?H?H?HF?H?H?H{?H?H?HC?Hm?Hx??HV?H?H?H?H?HV?HX?He?H?H?H?H?Hv?H?H??H?H?H?H?HC?H?H?Hv?H?H?HP??HV?H?H?H?H" 2003

      10 "?HV?HY?H?H?Hn?Ho??H?H?Hv??HiTAMA ?H?H?H?H?H?H5?H?H?HN?Hv??Hj" 2003

      11 "?H?H?H{?H?H?HY?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^???H?H" ?HL?H?H?Ht. 2003

      12 "?H?H?H{?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hg?HD?Hv?HV?HI?HK??H?H?H?H?HJ?Hj?HY?H?H??H?H?H?H?HI?H?H?H?H??HW?H?H?H\?H?H?H?H?H@?H\?" ?H?H?Hm???HV?H?H?H?H. 1997

      13 "?H?H?Hr?Hm?HW?H?H?H?H?H?H?HZ?Hp?Hv?HV?H?H?H?H?HN?H?H?HX?H^??H`?H?H??H?H??HA?H?H?HP??Hg?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H?" 03-004, 2003.

      14 "?H?H?H?H?H?H?Hn?H?H?H?H?HJ??H^?HW?H?H?H?H??H?H?H?H?H?H?H?H??H?H?Hi?H?H?H?H?HF?H?H?H?H?, ?H?H?H?H?Hs, ?H_?H?H?H?H?,?H?H?H?H??H?H?HH??Hc?H?H?HA?H?H?, ?H?H?H?H?Hs?H?H?HH??Hc?H?H?HA?H?H?, ?H_?H?H?H?H??H?H?HH??Hc?H?H?HA?H?H?, ?H?H?H?H??H?H?HH??HA?H?H?, ?H?H?H?H?Hs?H?H?HH??HA?H?H, ?H_?H?H?H?H??H?H?HH??HA?H?H?" 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 기슬혁신연구 -> 기술혁신연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.88
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.92 1.204 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼