RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      좌심실 수축 기능부전을 가진 급성 심근경색 환자에서 ST 분절 변화가 미치는 영향 = Impact of ST segment deviation in patients with acute myocardial infarction and Left ventricular systolic dysfunction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76493149

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      목적: 급성 심근경색 환자에서 ST 분절 상승의 영향에 대해서는 많은 연구가 이루어졌으나 좌심실 수축 기능부전을 동반한 심근경색 환자에서는 연구되지 않았다. 방법: 2004년 1월부터 2006년 ...

      목적: 급성 심근경색 환자에서 ST 분절 상승의 영향에 대해서는 많은 연구가 이루어졌으나 좌심실 수축 기능부전을 동반한 심근경색 환자에서는 연구되지 않았다. 방법: 2004년 1월부터 2006년 6월까지 좌심실 구혈률이 40% 이하의 수축 기능부전을 가진 급성 심근경색 환자 117명을 대상으로 하였다. ST 분절 상승 심근경색 77명과 비 ST 분절 상승 심근경색 환자 40명을 임상적 특징과 관상동맥조영술 결과 및 입원기간 및 1년 주요 심장사건(심장사망, 새로운 비치명적 심근경색, 목표혈관 재관류술, 심부전)을 후향적으로 분석하였다. 결과: ST 분절 상승에 따른 양 군의 기본적인 임상특징의 차이는 없었다. 관상동맥조영술의 TIMI flow 0 grade는 STEMI군에서 많았고(49.4% vs. 15.0%, p<0.01), 다혈관 질환은 NSTEMI군이 많았다(39.0% vs. 65.0%, p=0.01). 하지만 입원 중 심장 사망률과 주요 심장사건은 비슷했다(cardiac death 6.5% vs. 2.5%, p=0.66, MACE 19.5% vs. 22.5%, p=0.81). 1년 심장 사망률과 주요 심장사건에서도 의미있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(cardiac death 14.4% vs. 7.5%, p=0.37, MACE 33.8% vs. 30.0%, p=0.68). 결론: 좌심실 수축기능이 저하된 급성 심근경색 환자에서 ST 분절의 상승은 입원기간과 장기적인 예후에 영향을 미치지 않았다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background/Aims: Although the impact of ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been studied, little information is available on the impact of ST segment elevation in the patients with acute MI and left ventricular s...

      Background/Aims: Although the impact of ST segment elevation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) has been studied, little information is available on the impact of ST segment elevation in the patients with acute MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics and the in-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes of 117 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with acute MI and who had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%, and these patients were treated from January 2004 to June 2006 at Busan Paik Hospital. Coronary angiography at the index hospitalization and the major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including cardiac death, non-fatal reinfarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and heart failure, were compared between the 77 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and the 40 patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Results: Overall, the baseline clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. On the coronary angiography, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 0 flow was more common in the STEMI group as compared to the NSTEMI group (p<0.01) and the NSTEMI group had more frequent multivessel disease compared to the STEMI group (p=0.01). However, the in-hospital cardiac deaths and MACEs were not different on comparison between the two groups (p=0.66, p=0.81, respectively). The one-year cardiac deaths and MACEs were not significantly different on comparison between the two groups (p=0.37, p=0.68, respectively). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that ST segment elevation had no influence on in-hospital and the long term outcomes of patients with acute MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.(Korean J Med 74:632-639, 2008)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Nyman I, "Very early risk stratification by electrocardiogram at rest in men with suspected unstable coronary heart disease" 234 : 293-301, 1993

      2 Bhatt DL, "Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST- segment elevation acute coronary syndromes" 292 : 2096-2104, 2004

      3 Figueras J, "Thirty day prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary oedema complicating acute coronary syndromes" 91 : 889-893, 2005

      4 Benhorin J, "The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location" 15 : 1201-1207, 1990

      5 Fuster V, "The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes" 326 : 242-250, 1992

      6 Nicod P, "Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population" 79 : 528-536, 1989

      7 Nicod P, "Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population" 79 : 528-536, 1989

      8 Montalescot G, "STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different?: 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition( the OPERA registry)" 28 : 1409-1417, 2007

      9 Gomez JF, "Prognostic value of location and type of myocardial infarction in the setting of advanced left ventricular dysfunction" 99 : 642-646, 2007

      10 Talwar S, "Profile of plasma N-terminal proBNP following acute myocarial infarction: correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction" 21 : 1514-1521, 2000

      1 Nyman I, "Very early risk stratification by electrocardiogram at rest in men with suspected unstable coronary heart disease" 234 : 293-301, 1993

      2 Bhatt DL, "Utilization of early invasive management strategies for high-risk patients with non-ST- segment elevation acute coronary syndromes" 292 : 2096-2104, 2004

      3 Figueras J, "Thirty day prognosis of patients with acute pulmonary oedema complicating acute coronary syndromes" 91 : 889-893, 2005

      4 Benhorin J, "The prognostic significance of first myocardial infarction type (Q wave versus non-Q wave) and Q wave location" 15 : 1201-1207, 1990

      5 Fuster V, "The pathogenesis of coronary artery disease and the acute coronary syndromes" 326 : 242-250, 1992

      6 Nicod P, "Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population" 79 : 528-536, 1989

      7 Nicod P, "Short- and long-term clinical outcome after Q wave and non-Q wave myocardial infarction in a large patient population" 79 : 528-536, 1989

      8 Montalescot G, "STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different?: 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition( the OPERA registry)" 28 : 1409-1417, 2007

      9 Gomez JF, "Prognostic value of location and type of myocardial infarction in the setting of advanced left ventricular dysfunction" 99 : 642-646, 2007

      10 Talwar S, "Profile of plasma N-terminal proBNP following acute myocarial infarction: correlation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction" 21 : 1514-1521, 2000

      11 DeWood MA, "Prevalence of total occlusion during the early hours of transmural myocardial infarction" 303 : 897-902, 1980

      12 Fox KA, "Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE)" 333 : 1091-, 2006

      13 The Joint European Society of Cardiology, "Myocardial infarction redefined: a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction" 21 : 1502-1513, 2000

      14 Sabatine MS, "Multiple approach to risk stratification in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: simultaneous assessment of troponin I, C-reactive protein, B-type natriuretic peptide" 105 : 1760-1763, 2002

      15 Krone RJ, "Long-term prognosis after first Q-wave (transmural) or non-Q-wave (nontransmural) myocardial infarction: analysis of 593 patients" 52 : 234-239, 1983

      16 Bosch X, "Left ventricular ejection fraction to predict early mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes" 150 : 215-220, 2005

      17 Hare JM, "Ischemic cardiomyopathy: endomyocardial biopsy and ventriculographic evaluation of patients with congestive heart failure, dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease" 20 : 138-1325, 1992

      18 Maier B, "Improved therapy and outcome for patients with acute myocardial infarction: data of the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry from 1999 to 2004" 2007

      19 Schroder R, "Extent of early ST segment elevation resolution: a simple but strong predictor of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction" 24 : 384-391, 1994

      20 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Ischemia, "Effects of tissue plasminogen activator and a comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: results of the TIMI IIIB trial" 89 : 1545-1556, 1994

      21 de Winter RJ, "Early invasive versus selectively invasive management for acute coronary syndromes" 353 : 1095-1104, 2005

      22 Volpi A, "Determinants of 6-month mortality in survivors of myocardial infarction after thrombolysis: results of the GISSI-2 data base" 88 : 416-429, 1993

      23 Mehta SR, "Congestive heart failure complicating non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes" 83 : 98-103, 2005

      24 Abbott JD, "Comparison of outcome in patients with ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry)" 100 : 190-195, 2007

      25 Cox DA, "Comparative early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (from the CADILLAC Trial)" 98 : 331-337, 2006

      26 Ali AS, "Clinical predictors of heart failure in patients with first acute myocardial infarction" 138 : 1133-1139, 1999

      27 Holmes DR Jr, "Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation" 100 : 2067-2073, 1999

      28 Armstrong PW, "Acute coronary syndrome in the GUSTO-IIb trial: prognosis insights and impact of recurrent ischemia" 98 : 1860-1868, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-05-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Medicine -> The Korean Journal of Medicine KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.11 0.1 0.259 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼