RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Standardizing the Protocols for Enhanced Recovery From Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Are We a Step Closer to Ideal Recovery?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105116114

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: Enhanced recovery protocols are being implemented into the standard of care in surgical practice. This study aimed to insert a steadfast set of elements into the perioperative care pathway to establish an improved recovery program for colorectal cancer patients.
    Methods: Seventy patients planned for elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomized into 2 groups: conventional recovery group (n = 35) and enhanced recovery group (n = 35). The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the times of removal of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), successful enteral feeding, and removal of drains, postoperative complications, intra-hospital mortality, and rate of readmission.
    Results: The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.49 ± 0.85 days vs. 13.31 ± 6.9 days (P < 0.001), the mean time of removal of NGTs was 0.77 ± 1.031 days vs. 3.26 ± 2.737 days (P < 0.001), the mean time of successful enteral feeding was 1.89 ± 1.13 days vs. 5.46 ± 1.67 days (P < 0.001), and the mean time for removal of intra-abdominal drains was 2.94 ± 1.056 days vs. 9.06 ± 3.757 days (P < 0.001) for the enhanced and the conventional groups, respectively. Complications were significantly lower among patients in the enhanced group (25.7% vs. 65.7%) (P = 0.001). The rates of readmission were similar in the 2 groups.
    Conclusion: Applying definite evidence-based elements to the colorectal rehabilitation program significantly boosts the recovery pathway with favorable outcomes, including faster recovery of gastrointestinal tract functions, lower morbidities, and eventually earlier discharge from the hospital.
    번역하기

    Purpose: Enhanced recovery protocols are being implemented into the standard of care in surgical practice. This study aimed to insert a steadfast set of elements into the perioperative care pathway to establish an improved recovery program for colorec...

    Purpose: Enhanced recovery protocols are being implemented into the standard of care in surgical practice. This study aimed to insert a steadfast set of elements into the perioperative care pathway to establish an improved recovery program for colorectal cancer patients.
    Methods: Seventy patients planned for elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were randomized into 2 groups: conventional recovery group (n = 35) and enhanced recovery group (n = 35). The primary outcome was the length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included the times of removal of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), successful enteral feeding, and removal of drains, postoperative complications, intra-hospital mortality, and rate of readmission.
    Results: The mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.49 ± 0.85 days vs. 13.31 ± 6.9 days (P < 0.001), the mean time of removal of NGTs was 0.77 ± 1.031 days vs. 3.26 ± 2.737 days (P < 0.001), the mean time of successful enteral feeding was 1.89 ± 1.13 days vs. 5.46 ± 1.67 days (P < 0.001), and the mean time for removal of intra-abdominal drains was 2.94 ± 1.056 days vs. 9.06 ± 3.757 days (P < 0.001) for the enhanced and the conventional groups, respectively. Complications were significantly lower among patients in the enhanced group (25.7% vs. 65.7%) (P = 0.001). The rates of readmission were similar in the 2 groups.
    Conclusion: Applying definite evidence-based elements to the colorectal rehabilitation program significantly boosts the recovery pathway with favorable outcomes, including faster recovery of gastrointestinal tract functions, lower morbidities, and eventually earlier discharge from the hospital.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Vlug MS, "Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery?" 14 : 1001-1008, 2012

    2 Varadhan KK, "The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 29 : 434-440, 2010

    3 Al Chalabi H, "The benefit of an enhanced recovery programme following elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy" 25 : 761-766, 2010

    4 Wind J, "Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery" 93 : 800-809, 2006

    5 Verma R, "Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery" 1 : CD004929-, 2007

    6 Debarros M, "Perioperative protocols in colorectal surgery" 26 : 139-145, 2013

    7 Tsujinaka S, "Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks" 78 : 461-465, 2008

    8 Francis N, "Manual of fast track recovery for colorectal surgery" Springer-Verlag 2012

    9 Vlug MS, "Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study)" 254 : 868-875, 2011

    10 Rolph R, "Intra-abdominal drains for the prophylaxis of anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery" 1 : CD002100-, 2004

    1 Vlug MS, "Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery?" 14 : 1001-1008, 2012

    2 Varadhan KK, "The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 29 : 434-440, 2010

    3 Al Chalabi H, "The benefit of an enhanced recovery programme following elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy" 25 : 761-766, 2010

    4 Wind J, "Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery" 93 : 800-809, 2006

    5 Verma R, "Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery" 1 : CD004929-, 2007

    6 Debarros M, "Perioperative protocols in colorectal surgery" 26 : 139-145, 2013

    7 Tsujinaka S, "Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks" 78 : 461-465, 2008

    8 Francis N, "Manual of fast track recovery for colorectal surgery" Springer-Verlag 2012

    9 Vlug MS, "Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study)" 254 : 868-875, 2011

    10 Rolph R, "Intra-abdominal drains for the prophylaxis of anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery" 1 : CD002100-, 2004

    11 García-Botello S, "Implementation of a perioperative multimodal rehabilitation protocol in elective colorectal surgery. A prospective randomised controlled study" 89 : 159-166, 2011

    12 Gustafsson UO, "Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations" 37 : 259-284, 2013

    13 Alfonsi P, "French guidelines for enhanced recovery after elective colorectal surgery" 151 : 65-79, 2014

    14 Yang D, "Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and immunity after elective surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized controlled clinical trial" 36 : 1874-1880, 2012

    15 Wang G, "Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial" 17 : 671-676, 2011

    16 Serclová Z, "Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456)" 28 : 618-624, 2009

    17 Wang G, "Fast track rehabilitation programme enhances functional recovery after laparoscopic colonic resection" 59 : 2158-2163, 2012

    18 Compagna R, "Fast track for elderly patients: is it feasible for colorectal surgery?" 12 (12): S20-S22, 2014

    19 Kehlet H, "Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery" 248 : 189-198, 2008

    20 Greco M, "Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 38 : 1531-1541, 2014

    21 Ren L, "Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial" 36 : 407-414, 2012

    22 Karliczek A, "Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 8 : 259-265, 2006

    23 Lee TG, "Comparison of early mobilization and diet rehabilitation program with conventional care after laparoscopic colon surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial" 54 : 21-28, 2011

    24 Hughes M, "Attitudes of patients and care providers to enhanced recovery after surgery programs after major abdominal surgery" 193 : 102-110, 2015

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-03-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
    외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
    KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-11-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.07 0.06 0.312 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼