The effect on the response suppression and reinstatement in reminder trial effects for anticipation time task in motor learning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purposes of the study were to analyze AE in step of acquisition and retention to find out the effect on the response suppression and reinstatement in reminder trial effects for anticipation time task in motor learning. Participants of this study were students who attend university. A problem awaiting solution was anticipation time task and at the very last step, problem's position changing in time was allocated from a continuation of practice. To examine closely, these manipulations resulted in a 2(reminder)×2(position)×17(trial) factorial design for acquisition with the last factor as a repeated measure and a 2(reminder)×2(position) factorial design for retention. Synthetically, suppression response was occurred when an experiment task in practiced in the first position of a blocked practice schedule. Suppression response was not occurred when a primary task in practiced in the last position of a blocked practice schedule. Reinstatement of suppression response for a primary task was occurred when given reminder trial at the end of acquisition. The present findings demonstrate evidence that reminder trial have the advantage of a random practice schedule condition in motor learning(Shea & Titzer,l993; Fairbrother,2000; Jeon, 2003).

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. Introduction
• Ⅱ. Method
• Ⅲ. Result
• Ⅳ. Discussion
• Reference

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Fairbrother, J. T, "The roles of response suppression and reinstatement in reminder trial effects in motor learning" The Florida State University 2000

2 Lee, "The locus of contextual interference in motorskill acquisition Journal of Experimental Psychology" 730-746, 1983

3 Shea, "The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effects Journal of Motor Behavior" 264-274, 1993

4 Shea, "The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effects Journal of Motor Behavior" 264-274, 1993

5 Battig, "The flexibility of human memory Levels of processing in human memory" 1979

6 Jeon, J. S, "The effect of contextual interference effect in reminder trial effect in motor learning" The Sangji University 2003

7 Stark, "Temporal changes in interference Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior" 672-694, 1968

8 Meeuwsen, "Spacing of repetitions versus contextual interference effects in motor skill learning Journal of Human Movement Studies" 213-228, 1991

9 Yoon, Y. J, "Should subject's expertise be controlled in motor skill study?" 1995

10 Del Rey, "Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport" 120-126, 1994

11 Del Rey, "Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport" 120-126, 1994

12 Del Rey, "Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport" 120-126, 1994

13 Magill, R. A, "Motor learning Concepts and Applications" McGraw Hill Inc 2001

14 Schmidt, R. A, "Motor control and learning A Behavioral Empasis" Human Kinetics 1999

15 Schmidt, "Motor and action perspectives on motor behavior" 1988

16 Lee, "Differing perspective in motor learning" 1985

17 Schmidt, "Coupling dynamics in interlimb coordination Journal of Experimental Psychology" 397-415, 1993

18 Shea, "Contextual interference effects on the acquisition and transfer of a motor skill Journal of Experimental Psychology" 179-187, 1979

19 Brady, F, "A theoretical and empirical review of the contextual interference effect and the learning of motor skills" 50 : 266-293, 1998

20 Shewokis, P. A, "A test of retroactive inhibition as an explanation of contextual interference" 69 : 70-74, 1998

21 Schmidt, "A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning theory" 225-260, 1975

22 Magill, "A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition" 241-289, 1990

23 Shea, "A model for contextual interference effects in motor learning" In C Plenum Press 1994