RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사해신탁취소권과 수익권양도청구권의 법적 성질 및 도산절차상 취급 = Revocation of Fraudulent Trusts and Claims for the Transfer of Beneficial Interests:Legal Nature and Treatment in Insolvency Proceedings

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110283066

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A trust is established when a settlor transfers trust property to a trustee and designates a beneficiary who is entitled to enjoy the benefits derived from that property. Where the establishment of a trust prejudices the settlor’s creditors, it constitutes a fraudulent trust. Article 8 of the Trust Act provides specific rules to protect creditors in such circumstances. Although these provisions perform functions similar to the creditor's right of revocation provided under the Civil Act, they are significant as special provisions reflecting the structural characteristics of trusts, which are based on a tripartite legal relationship among the settlor, trustee, and beneficiary.
    Article 8 of the Trust Act consists primarily of two mechanisms:the revocation of a fraudulent trust and the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests. In particular, the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests represents a distinctive mechanism that reflects the structural features of trusts. These two rights serve complementary functions in protecting creditors but they are understood as independent rights that must be exercised alternatively. The revocation of a fraudulent trust may be exercised against either the trustee or a beneficiary acting in bad faith, and the scope of revocation and restitution may differ depending on the party against whom the right is exercised.
    In insolvency proceedings, additional legal issues arise, including the relationship with avoidance powers, the right of repossession, and the classification of related claims as administrative claims. The claim for the transfer of beneficial interests is distinct from the revocation of a fraudulent trust, although it shares similar substantive requirements. Its most significant feature is that it presupposes the continued validity of the trust. Consequently, its legal status in insolvency proceedings may differ from that of the revocation of a fraudulent trust. In light of these issues, this article examines the legal structure of the revocation of a fraudulent trust and the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests, as well as the major legal issues arising from them.
    번역하기

    A trust is established when a settlor transfers trust property to a trustee and designates a beneficiary who is entitled to enjoy the benefits derived from that property. Where the establishment of a trust prejudices the settlor’s creditors, it cons...

    A trust is established when a settlor transfers trust property to a trustee and designates a beneficiary who is entitled to enjoy the benefits derived from that property. Where the establishment of a trust prejudices the settlor’s creditors, it constitutes a fraudulent trust. Article 8 of the Trust Act provides specific rules to protect creditors in such circumstances. Although these provisions perform functions similar to the creditor's right of revocation provided under the Civil Act, they are significant as special provisions reflecting the structural characteristics of trusts, which are based on a tripartite legal relationship among the settlor, trustee, and beneficiary.
    Article 8 of the Trust Act consists primarily of two mechanisms:the revocation of a fraudulent trust and the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests. In particular, the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests represents a distinctive mechanism that reflects the structural features of trusts. These two rights serve complementary functions in protecting creditors but they are understood as independent rights that must be exercised alternatively. The revocation of a fraudulent trust may be exercised against either the trustee or a beneficiary acting in bad faith, and the scope of revocation and restitution may differ depending on the party against whom the right is exercised.
    In insolvency proceedings, additional legal issues arise, including the relationship with avoidance powers, the right of repossession, and the classification of related claims as administrative claims. The claim for the transfer of beneficial interests is distinct from the revocation of a fraudulent trust, although it shares similar substantive requirements. Its most significant feature is that it presupposes the continued validity of the trust. Consequently, its legal status in insolvency proceedings may differ from that of the revocation of a fraudulent trust. In light of these issues, this article examines the legal structure of the revocation of a fraudulent trust and the claim for the transfer of beneficial interests, as well as the major legal issues arising from them.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼