RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Ideas Matter: Explaining India’s Principles-Based Peacemaking Role in the Korean War

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109092042

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      During the Korean War, major powers such as the United States, Soviet Union, and China were solely driven by their own security interests. Consequently, their policies towards the crisis prioritized their own security and power maximization, leading to their alignment with one side and intensifying the conflict. While the United States sided with the South, China and the Soviet Union sided with the North. In contrast, India took a unique approach during the Korean War. India, which was heavily involved in the crisis as a proactive peacemaker, adopted a stance based on morality, neutrality, and favorability towards the Korean people.
      This approach was very different from the major powers who were focused on their security and power interests. The question that arises is: why did India take a different stance than other major powers? What explains India’s role as a peacemaker that focused on morality and neutrality in the Korean War when other major powers were focused on power and security maximization? To answer these questions, I draw on the existing literature that suggests the ideas generated domestically can profoundly impact foreign policy. Based on this, I argue that India’s active role in seeking peace during the Korean War and its unique approach to resolving the Korean crisis was largely influenced by principled ideas such as non-interference, neutrality, rejection of power politics, and Asian unity rooted in its historical experience during the independence movement. To evaluate my argument, I employ four case studies related to India’s involvement in the Korean War and demonstrate how the principled ideas discussed above influenced India’s active but neutral and unbiased peacemaking role in resolving the Korean question at a time when major powers’ security maximization actions were intensifying the crisis.
      번역하기

      During the Korean War, major powers such as the United States, Soviet Union, and China were solely driven by their own security interests. Consequently, their policies towards the crisis prioritized their own security and power maximization, leading t...

      During the Korean War, major powers such as the United States, Soviet Union, and China were solely driven by their own security interests. Consequently, their policies towards the crisis prioritized their own security and power maximization, leading to their alignment with one side and intensifying the conflict. While the United States sided with the South, China and the Soviet Union sided with the North. In contrast, India took a unique approach during the Korean War. India, which was heavily involved in the crisis as a proactive peacemaker, adopted a stance based on morality, neutrality, and favorability towards the Korean people.
      This approach was very different from the major powers who were focused on their security and power interests. The question that arises is: why did India take a different stance than other major powers? What explains India’s role as a peacemaker that focused on morality and neutrality in the Korean War when other major powers were focused on power and security maximization? To answer these questions, I draw on the existing literature that suggests the ideas generated domestically can profoundly impact foreign policy. Based on this, I argue that India’s active role in seeking peace during the Korean War and its unique approach to resolving the Korean crisis was largely influenced by principled ideas such as non-interference, neutrality, rejection of power politics, and Asian unity rooted in its historical experience during the independence movement. To evaluate my argument, I employ four case studies related to India’s involvement in the Korean War and demonstrate how the principled ideas discussed above influenced India’s active but neutral and unbiased peacemaking role in resolving the Korean question at a time when major powers’ security maximization actions were intensifying the crisis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Manjari Chatterjee Miller, "Wronged by Empire Post–Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China" Stanford University Press 2013

      2 Amitabh Acharya, "Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism" Cornell University Press 2009

      3 Timothy W. Martin, "While the World Was Looking Elsewhere, North Korea Became a Bigger Threat"

      4 "United Nations, 84 (1950). Resolution of 7 July 1950"

      5 "United Nations, 82 (1950). Resolution of 25 June 1950"

      6 Kenneth Waltz, "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 170-, 1979

      7 Jawaharlal Nehru, "The Unity of India, Collected Writings 1937–1940" Lindsay Drummond 268-272, 1948

      8 Jawaharlal Nehru, "The Unity of India" 16 (16): 231-243, 1938

      9 Leon Gordenker, "The United Nations, the United States Occupation and the 1948 Election in Korea" 73 (73): 429-, 1958

      10 Rajiv Kumar, "The U.S.–China Chip War and Prospects for South Korea–India Semiconductor Cooperation" 4 (4): 1-30, 2023

      1 Manjari Chatterjee Miller, "Wronged by Empire Post–Imperial Ideology and Foreign Policy in India and China" Stanford University Press 2013

      2 Amitabh Acharya, "Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism" Cornell University Press 2009

      3 Timothy W. Martin, "While the World Was Looking Elsewhere, North Korea Became a Bigger Threat"

      4 "United Nations, 84 (1950). Resolution of 7 July 1950"

      5 "United Nations, 82 (1950). Resolution of 25 June 1950"

      6 Kenneth Waltz, "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 170-, 1979

      7 Jawaharlal Nehru, "The Unity of India, Collected Writings 1937–1940" Lindsay Drummond 268-272, 1948

      8 Jawaharlal Nehru, "The Unity of India" 16 (16): 231-243, 1938

      9 Leon Gordenker, "The United Nations, the United States Occupation and the 1948 Election in Korea" 73 (73): 429-, 1958

      10 Rajiv Kumar, "The U.S.–China Chip War and Prospects for South Korea–India Semiconductor Cooperation" 4 (4): 1-30, 2023

      11 John Mearsheimer, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton 132-133, 2001

      12 Rajiv Kumar, "The Supply Chain Diversification and India–South Korea Cooperation in a Contested East Asia in the post–COVID-19 Era" 2 (2): 1-21, 2021

      13 Rup Narayan Das, "The Stormy Parliamentary Debates of 1962" 6 (6): 125-140, 2012

      14 김찬완, "The Role of India in the Korean War" 13 (13): 21-37, 2010

      15 F. H. Soward, "The Korean Crisis and The Commonwealth" 24 (24): 115-130, 1951

      16 Steven Lee, "The Korean Armistice and the End of Peace: The US–UN Coalition and the Dynamics of War-Making in Korea, 1953–76" 18 (18): 183-224, 2013

      17 Yong Wook Lee, "The Japanese Challenge to the American Neoliberal World Order Identity, Meaning, and Foreign Policy" Stanford University Press 2008

      18 Judith Goldstein, "The Impact of Ideas on Trade Policy: The Origins of U.S. Agricultural and Manufacturing Policies" 43 (43): 31-71, 1989

      19 Paul Zinner, "The Ideological Bases of Soviet Foreign Policy" 4 (4): 489-, 1952

      20 William Henderson, "The Development of Regionalism in Southeast Asia" 19 (19): 463-476, 1955

      21 U.S. Department of State, "The Cairo Conference, 1943"

      22 Parliament of India, "Statement by Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs, Rajya Sabha Debates, 15 May 1953"

      23 K. P. S. Menon, "Speech by Mr. K.P.S. Menon, Foreign Secretary to the Government of India on INDIA’S FOREIGN POLICY at the Staff College, Wellington"

      24 Permanent Mission of India to the UN, "Speech at 8th Session 448th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly"

      25 Permanent Mission of India to the UN, "Speech at 5th Session 286th Plenary Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly"

      26 Alexander Wendt, "Social Theory of International Politics" Cambridge University Press 1999

      27 Hans J. Morgenthau, "Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace" Knopf 426-, 1973

      28 Parliament of India, "Nuclear Test by North Korea. Rajya Sabha Debates, July 23"

      29 Jiha Ham, "North Korea Turns to India for Rice amid Food Shortages"

      30 RAJIVKUMAR, "New Threat Perceptions, Domestic Political Changes and India’s Shifting Strategy toward the U.S.–China Rivalry" 35 (35): 253-257, 2023

      31 김보영, "Negotiation of POWs during the Korean War and the Chinese Communists POWs’ Choice" 123 : 177-210, 2016

      32 "Menon Back in Korea; UN Body to Convene"

      33 "Koreans Greet U.N. Commission; Hear Indian Make Plea for Unity"

      34 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 3 1953–1957" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 244-245, 1958

      35 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 3 1953–1957" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 240-, 1958

      36 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 2 1949–1953" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 1954

      37 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 1 1946–1949" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 324-, 1949

      38 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 1 1946–1949" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 1949

      39 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Jawaharlal Nehru Speeches Volume 1 1946–1949" Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting 25-26, 1949

      40 Rosemary Brissenden, "India’s Opposition to SEATO: A Case Study in Neutralist Diplomacy" 6 (6): 219-232, 1960

      41 Gilles Boquerat, "India’s Commitment to Peaceful Coexistence and the Settlement of the Indochina War" 5 (5): 211-234, 2005

      42 Ministry of External Affairs of India, "India–Republic of Korea Joint Statement: Towards a Strategic Partnership"

      43 Priya Chacko, "Indian Foreign Policy: The Politics of Postcolonial Identity from 1947 to 2004" Routledge 2011

      44 Jawaharlal Nehru, "Indian Foreign Policy (Selected Statements)" 41 (41): 74-100, 1985

      45 An Indian Official, "India as a World Power" 27 (27): 548-, 1949

      46 "India Urges Egypt Back South Korea; Ambassador in Cairo Asserts Every Nation Should Join in Resisting Aggression"

      47 Ministry of External Affairs of India, "India Provides Humanitarian Food Assistance to DPRK"

      48 "India Parliament to Meet on Korea"

      49 Anirban Bhumik, "India Hands $1 Million Aid to North Korea, Greets Kim Kong Un"

      50 "India Contributes US$1 Mln for WFP’s Humanitarian Activities in N. Korea"

      51 K. M. Panikkar, "In Two Chinas: Memoirs of a Diplomat" Allen and Unwin 108-, 1955

      52 Robert H. Jackson, "Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change" Cornell University Press 111-138, 1993

      53 G. John Ikenberry, "Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change" Cornell University Press 57-86, 1993

      54 Judith Goldstein, "Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change" Cornell University Press 1993

      55 Kathryn Sikkink, "Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change" Cornell University Press 139-172, 1993

      56 RAJIVKUMAR, "Explaining the Origins and Evolution of India’s Korean Policy" 18 (18): 182-198, 2015

      57 Peter J. Katzenstein, "Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan" Cornell University Press 1996

      58 Permanent Mission of India to the UN, "4th Session 222nd Plenary Meeting, 21st September, 1949 by Sir Benegal N Rao"

      59 Permanent Mission of India to the UN, "2nd Session 85th Plenary Meeting, 19th September, 1947, by Mrs. Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼