RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    주주총회결의를 다투는 소송의 소송물에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Subject-Matter in the Litigations Regarding the Resolution of a General Shareholder’s Meeting

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104729857

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In investigating the subject-matter in the litigations regarding the resolution of a general shareholder’s meeting under the current Commercial Act, we should grasp the contents of the matter of the lawsuits based on the relevant provisions of the Act in view of the interest of the person who is entitled to institute an action and the securing of a legal stabilization. In the case of the litigation for revocation of a resolution, restrictions are placed on the person has the authority to file a lawsuit and the period of instituting an action, etc. It needs to comprehend in respect to the contents of the claim of it that the litigation for confirmation of the nullity or non-existence of a resolution is a kind of lawsuits for confirmation. It is not desirable to understand that the subject-matter in the lawsuits about a resolution of general meeting of stockholders is single on the ground of diffuse boundaries of the causes of revocation, nullity and non-existence because it brings about unreasonable consequence which hurts the legal stabilization.
    When a plaintiff demands the ruling of revocation/confirmation of nullity or non-existence because his/her alleged facts constitute the grounds of revocation/nullity/non-existence, the courts of a lawsuit treat it as the litigation for revocation/confirmation of nullity or non-existence of a resolution and shall proceed a trial. If it has been proved that plaintiff’s facts correspond to the defects in a resolution of a different action types by the result of deliberation of the courts, they have to exercise the right to request elucidation and then provide the opportunity that the plaintiff shall alter his/her claims into the right kind of an action. That will make possible to prevent that plaintiffs have a disadvantage because of the obscurity of the flaws in resolutions.
    번역하기

    In investigating the subject-matter in the litigations regarding the resolution of a general shareholder’s meeting under the current Commercial Act, we should grasp the contents of the matter of the lawsuits based on the relevant provisions of the A...

    In investigating the subject-matter in the litigations regarding the resolution of a general shareholder’s meeting under the current Commercial Act, we should grasp the contents of the matter of the lawsuits based on the relevant provisions of the Act in view of the interest of the person who is entitled to institute an action and the securing of a legal stabilization. In the case of the litigation for revocation of a resolution, restrictions are placed on the person has the authority to file a lawsuit and the period of instituting an action, etc. It needs to comprehend in respect to the contents of the claim of it that the litigation for confirmation of the nullity or non-existence of a resolution is a kind of lawsuits for confirmation. It is not desirable to understand that the subject-matter in the lawsuits about a resolution of general meeting of stockholders is single on the ground of diffuse boundaries of the causes of revocation, nullity and non-existence because it brings about unreasonable consequence which hurts the legal stabilization.
    When a plaintiff demands the ruling of revocation/confirmation of nullity or non-existence because his/her alleged facts constitute the grounds of revocation/nullity/non-existence, the courts of a lawsuit treat it as the litigation for revocation/confirmation of nullity or non-existence of a resolution and shall proceed a trial. If it has been proved that plaintiff’s facts correspond to the defects in a resolution of a different action types by the result of deliberation of the courts, they have to exercise the right to request elucidation and then provide the opportunity that the plaintiff shall alter his/her claims into the right kind of an action. That will make possible to prevent that plaintiffs have a disadvantage because of the obscurity of the flaws in resolutions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김병재, "회사법상의 제문제[상]" 법원행정처 1987

    2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2014

    3 서정갑, "회사법" 경진사 1989

    4 오세욱, "형성소송의 소송물과 변론주의" 판례월보사 (263) : 1992

    5 김교창, "주주총회의 운영" 육법사 2010

    6 황성호, "주주총회결의하자에 관한 소에 대한 고찰" 법원도서관 24 : 1997

    7 김상근, "주주총회결의하자 소송에 관한 실무적 고찰" 한국사법행정학회 12 : 2003

    8 정동윤, "주석 상법[회사(Ⅲ)]" 한국사법행정학회 2014

    9 김주수, "주석 민법[상속(1)]" 한국사법행정학회 2010

    10 최기원, "신회사법론" 박영사 2012

    1 김병재, "회사법상의 제문제[상]" 법원행정처 1987

    2 이철송, "회사법강의" 박영사 2014

    3 서정갑, "회사법" 경진사 1989

    4 오세욱, "형성소송의 소송물과 변론주의" 판례월보사 (263) : 1992

    5 김교창, "주주총회의 운영" 육법사 2010

    6 황성호, "주주총회결의하자에 관한 소에 대한 고찰" 법원도서관 24 : 1997

    7 김상근, "주주총회결의하자 소송에 관한 실무적 고찰" 한국사법행정학회 12 : 2003

    8 정동윤, "주석 상법[회사(Ⅲ)]" 한국사법행정학회 2014

    9 김주수, "주석 민법[상속(1)]" 한국사법행정학회 2010

    10 최기원, "신회사법론" 박영사 2012

    11 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2015

    12 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" 박영사 2014

    13 정동윤, "상법강의(상)" 법문사 2012

    14 손주찬, "상법(상)" 박영사 2003

    15 강현중, "민사소송법강의" 박영사 2013

    16 정동윤・유병현, "민사소송법" 법문사 2014

    17 김홍규, "민사소송법" 삼영사 2014

    18 김용진, "다시본 민사소송법" 청목출판사 2012

    19 小山 昇, "訴訟物の硏究[小山昇著作集 第1卷]" 信山社 1994

    20 前田 庸, "實務民事訴訟法講座5 會社訴訟・特許訴訟" 日本評論社 1969

    21 谷口安平, "多数當事者訴訟・会社訴訟[民事水続法論集第2巻]" 信山社 2013

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.31 0.31 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.5 0.606 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼