서사문학사의 전개 원리와 소설 -매체 전환기 서사의 미래 탐색을 위한 예비적 고찰 = A Study on Narrative Literature`s Historical Unit System and Novel

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

What is called narrative literature essentially has a form to be capable of holding anything and a tendency to hold anything. Its genres have ground -less and obscure. In it, any genre once established or any type once made is not easy to disappear. Although having been forgotten for a while, they never have wholly disappeared in the history of narrative literature. Anything that was once established can be applied again by anyone and anytime. Therefore, narrative literature has made a unity of stream, being more enriched and grown. This is narrative literature`s historical unit system. This historical unit system has been more deepened and extended in the appearance of novel as described narrative literature. Novel extends its own realm, going beyond the tradition of narrative literature, and receiving so many pieces of information about reality and reversely reflect them in itself. The popularity of books has a significance in the history of narrative literature, which is based upon the invention of characters and the development of papers and printing. Novel, through a mode of description, has the legibility of being repeatedly readable, the storage of making copies and circulation, and the independence of being gained in distinguishing writer and reader, etc. And so there can be unrestricted editing, commer-cialization, and the appearance of self-conscious writers. Nowaday, however, novel goes through a crisis. A genre of narrative picture combining theatrical elements, appeared as a winner in a market of cultural product, displaying a capacity of representing truthfulness to life. Nevertheless, this is the crisis of novel, not that of narrative literature. From now on, we have to consider an alternative of novel, and, at the same time, to contrive to have flourished with an art of narrative literature which is serious and significant through such a genre of narrative picture as films and games. To fulfill this mission, it seems to me that the past history of novel will serve as a good reference.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김창현, "한일소설형성사-자본이 이상을 몰아내다" 책세상 17-46, 2002

2 김준오, "한국현대장르비평론" 문학과지성사 1990

3 김창현, "한국적 장르론과 장르 보편성" 지식산업사 84-159, 2005

4 조동일, "한국소설의 이론" 지식산업사 271-454, 1977

5 조동일, "한국문학의 갈래 이론" 지식산업사 55-242, 1992

6 김창현, "한국문학에 나타난 가족과 공동체" 제이앤씨 251-262, 2004

7 김학성, "한국 고시가의 거시적 탐구" 집문당 278-286, 1997

8 Bakhtin, M. M., "장편소설과 민중언어" 창작과비평사 18-61, 1988

9 정출헌, "심청전의 민중정서와 그 형상화 방식 in : 고소설연구1" 태학사 447-479, 1997

10 김창현, "미적범주에 대하여" 도남학회 17 : 23-42, 1998

11 김준오, "문학사와 장르" 문학과지성사 2000

12 李德懋, "靑莊館全書 卷5-6" 瓔處雜稿

13 一然, "三國遺事" 이회문화사 275-283, 2003

14 金富軾, "三國史記" 을유문화사 350-352, 1996

15 Stanzel, F. K., "Theorie des Erzählens(소설의 이론)" 문학과비평사 18-44, 1990

16 Lamping, Dieter, "Das lyrische Gedicht:Definitionen zu theorie und Geschichte der Gattund(서정시:이론과 역사)" 한길사 35-158, 1982

17 Frye, N., "Anatomy of Criticism(비평의 해부)" 한길사 49-53, 1982