RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      제약시장에서의 역지급합의에 대한 경쟁법 적용에 관한 연구 = Regulating the Reverse Payment Agreement In the Pharmaceutical market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76592396

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the event KORUS FTA will be approved by each countries Congress, Korea has to revise the Drug Act for the purpose of implementing the FTA, a bilateral treaty between Korea and United States. If then, same problem in US re reverse payment agreement will be a legal issue in Korea based upon the same provision on the 180 days exclusivity for the protection of the first filer of the ANDA to KFDA. The standard of the Court re reverse payment agreement is not decisive even in United States whether rule of reason or per se illegal scrutiny has to be applied as of today. In case of Korea reverse payment agreement will be classified as a sort of hardcore cartel behavior, considering the context of the Korean FTC`s guideline looks like and the nature of the reverse payment agreement thinking of how it works between the original drug manufacturer, the patent holder and generic drug manufacturer, the first ANDA applicant. In accordance with the Korean FTC`s guideline, once reverse payment agreement decided as a part of hardcore cartel, then no market analysis has to done by Korean FTC. This situation means it will be hard to be justified in Korea to reach an reverse payment agreement. However any special treatment for the protection of the patent holder in order to facilitate the new drug innovation has to considered in the process of legislation for both ends meet as was the same case when Hatch-Waxman Act was made.
      번역하기

      In the event KORUS FTA will be approved by each countries Congress, Korea has to revise the Drug Act for the purpose of implementing the FTA, a bilateral treaty between Korea and United States. If then, same problem in US re reverse payment agreement ...

      In the event KORUS FTA will be approved by each countries Congress, Korea has to revise the Drug Act for the purpose of implementing the FTA, a bilateral treaty between Korea and United States. If then, same problem in US re reverse payment agreement will be a legal issue in Korea based upon the same provision on the 180 days exclusivity for the protection of the first filer of the ANDA to KFDA. The standard of the Court re reverse payment agreement is not decisive even in United States whether rule of reason or per se illegal scrutiny has to be applied as of today. In case of Korea reverse payment agreement will be classified as a sort of hardcore cartel behavior, considering the context of the Korean FTC`s guideline looks like and the nature of the reverse payment agreement thinking of how it works between the original drug manufacturer, the patent holder and generic drug manufacturer, the first ANDA applicant. In accordance with the Korean FTC`s guideline, once reverse payment agreement decided as a part of hardcore cartel, then no market analysis has to done by Korean FTC. This situation means it will be hard to be justified in Korea to reach an reverse payment agreement. However any special treatment for the protection of the patent holder in order to facilitate the new drug innovation has to considered in the process of legislation for both ends meet as was the same case when Hatch-Waxman Act was made.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임정훈, "특허권존속기간연장등록제도에 관한 외국의 예 및 제약 산업에 미치는 영향 연구"

      2 사공진, "제약산업의 시장점유율 결정에 관한 Panel Study" 한국보건경제정책학회 13 (13): 71-96, 2007

      3 배은영, "의약품등재가격결정방식 및 개선방안 연구"

      4 최승재, "생명공학특허에 대한 특허성 소고"

      5 배건우, "국내제약산업의 전망과 신약 개발 현황" 8 (8): 2005

      6 NATALIE M. DERZKO, "THE IMPACT OF RECENT REFORMS OF THE HATCH-WAXMAN SCHEME ON ORANGE BOOK STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION" 45 (45): 2005

      7 Patiricia M. Danzon, "Rises and Availability of Pharmaceuticals: Evidence from Nine Countries" 29 : 2003

      8 Chris Dent, "Research Use of Patented Knowledge: A Review" STI 2006

      9 David Balto, "Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement: The Antitrust Risks" 55 : 321-325, 2000

      10 Sheryl Stolberg, "Keeping Down the Competition: How Companies Stall Generics and Keep themselves Healthy"

      1 임정훈, "특허권존속기간연장등록제도에 관한 외국의 예 및 제약 산업에 미치는 영향 연구"

      2 사공진, "제약산업의 시장점유율 결정에 관한 Panel Study" 한국보건경제정책학회 13 (13): 71-96, 2007

      3 배은영, "의약품등재가격결정방식 및 개선방안 연구"

      4 최승재, "생명공학특허에 대한 특허성 소고"

      5 배건우, "국내제약산업의 전망과 신약 개발 현황" 8 (8): 2005

      6 NATALIE M. DERZKO, "THE IMPACT OF RECENT REFORMS OF THE HATCH-WAXMAN SCHEME ON ORANGE BOOK STRATEGIC BEHAVIOR AND PHARMACEUTICAL INNOVATION" 45 (45): 2005

      7 Patiricia M. Danzon, "Rises and Availability of Pharmaceuticals: Evidence from Nine Countries" 29 : 2003

      8 Chris Dent, "Research Use of Patented Knowledge: A Review" STI 2006

      9 David Balto, "Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement: The Antitrust Risks" 55 : 321-325, 2000

      10 Sheryl Stolberg, "Keeping Down the Competition: How Companies Stall Generics and Keep themselves Healthy"

      11 John R. McNair, "IF HATCH WINS, MAKE WAXMAN PAY: ONE-WAY FEE SHIFTING AS A SUBSTITUTE INCENTIVE TO RESOLVE ABUSE OF THE HATCH-WAXMAN ACT" 2007 (2007): 2007

      12 Federal Trade Commission, "Generic Drug Entry Prior to Patent Expiration: An FTC Study"

      13 Andrew A. Caffrey, "Consumer Protection, Patents and Procedure: Generic Drug Market Entry and the Need to Reform the Hatch-Waxman Act" 9 : 3-4, 2004

      14 "Abbreviated New Drug Application Regulations: Patent and Exclusivity Provision" 59 : 50338-50345, 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼