RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    농구경기의 팀워크 개념구조 및 팀워크 지각 척도개발 = Construction on Teamwork of Basketball Game and Development of Teamwork Perception Scale

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76543923

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purposes of this research were to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball that demanding the high level of teamwork and to develop the teamwork perception scale. In other to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball, an open survey on 57 amateur basketball players and in-depth interviews to 13 field coaches and retired basketball players were carried out. With the inductive content analysis based on the result, 4 factors were classified; training teamwork, game teamwork, personal relationship & group life, and the influence of a lealif. Based on the inductive content analysis, 58 preliminary quesnce ofabout teamwork perception of basketball game were mali and 99 amateur basketball players in 8 teams responded on the quesnce o.eam the result of descriptive analysis and reliability analysis, 48 quesnce ofwere re ieded among the 58 preliminary quesnce o. By the result of the preliminary research, this research carried out exploratory factor analysisonFa) on amateur basketball players in 24 teams to extract the s ftable structure modelfabout 48 quesnce o.eafter thatplo8 quesnce ofwere de ided, and 20 quesnce ofof 4 factors were extracted. In the concrete, the 4 factors were coinosed of eqBaselealing factor,up ity factor,ufo8 owship factor,uand lealif acfort factor. With the 20 quesnce offrom EFa, confirmatory factor analysisoCFa) to amateur players in 27 teams to mtie sure the s ftability of factor model.eam the result, 3 quesnce ofwere de ided, so 17 quesnce ofof 4 factors were developed am the final meamurement scale. In the concrete, there were 3 questions of equal leading factor, 7 questions of unity factor, 3 questions of fellowship factor, and 4 questions of leader effort factor. Internal reliability of the final scale developed was confirmed, and external validity was partially confirmed by checking the convergence and the discriminant validity with applying Multitrait-Multimethod(MTMM) method.
    번역하기

    The purposes of this research were to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball that demanding the high level of teamwork and to develop the teamwork perception scale. In other to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball, an open su...

    The purposes of this research were to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball that demanding the high level of teamwork and to develop the teamwork perception scale. In other to explore the construction on teamwork in basketball, an open survey on 57 amateur basketball players and in-depth interviews to 13 field coaches and retired basketball players were carried out. With the inductive content analysis based on the result, 4 factors were classified; training teamwork, game teamwork, personal relationship & group life, and the influence of a lealif. Based on the inductive content analysis, 58 preliminary quesnce ofabout teamwork perception of basketball game were mali and 99 amateur basketball players in 8 teams responded on the quesnce o.eam the result of descriptive analysis and reliability analysis, 48 quesnce ofwere re ieded among the 58 preliminary quesnce o. By the result of the preliminary research, this research carried out exploratory factor analysisonFa) on amateur basketball players in 24 teams to extract the s ftable structure modelfabout 48 quesnce o.eafter thatplo8 quesnce ofwere de ided, and 20 quesnce ofof 4 factors were extracted. In the concrete, the 4 factors were coinosed of eqBaselealing factor,up ity factor,ufo8 owship factor,uand lealif acfort factor. With the 20 quesnce offrom EFa, confirmatory factor analysisoCFa) to amateur players in 27 teams to mtie sure the s ftability of factor model.eam the result, 3 quesnce ofwere de ided, so 17 quesnce ofof 4 factors were developed am the final meamurement scale. In the concrete, there were 3 questions of equal leading factor, 7 questions of unity factor, 3 questions of fellowship factor, and 4 questions of leader effort factor. Internal reliability of the final scale developed was confirmed, and external validity was partially confirmed by checking the convergence and the discriminant validity with applying Multitrait-Multimethod(MTMM) method.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이상호, "팀제의 이론과 실제" 5 : 127-145, 2002

    2 박원우, "팀웍의 개념, 측정 및 증진방법" 서울대학교 출판부 2006

    3 안병현, "팀웍과 팀유효성의 관계에 관한 계에" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

    4 김병목, "팀웍과 팀웍의 결정요인에 대한 측정도구 개발" 성균관대학교 대학원 2005

    5 최혜원, "팀 내 공유된 인식모델 형성의 영향요인 및 결과에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2003

    6 김원배, "투기종목 선수의 정신력 개념구조 탐색 및 측정도구 개발" 서울대학교 대학원 2001

    7 엄한주, "체육학연구에서 요인분석모형의 적용 및 오용에 관한 현황분석" 한국체육학회 47 (47): 1-16, 2008

    8 탁진국, "심리검사-개발과 평가방법의 이해" 학지사 2001

    9 탁진국, "심리검사" 학지사 1997

    10 정청희, "스포츠심리학의 이해" 도서출판 금광 1999

    1 이상호, "팀제의 이론과 실제" 5 : 127-145, 2002

    2 박원우, "팀웍의 개념, 측정 및 증진방법" 서울대학교 출판부 2006

    3 안병현, "팀웍과 팀유효성의 관계에 관한 계에" 서울대학교 대학원 2005

    4 김병목, "팀웍과 팀웍의 결정요인에 대한 측정도구 개발" 성균관대학교 대학원 2005

    5 최혜원, "팀 내 공유된 인식모델 형성의 영향요인 및 결과에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 2003

    6 김원배, "투기종목 선수의 정신력 개념구조 탐색 및 측정도구 개발" 서울대학교 대학원 2001

    7 엄한주, "체육학연구에서 요인분석모형의 적용 및 오용에 관한 현황분석" 한국체육학회 47 (47): 1-16, 2008

    8 탁진국, "심리검사-개발과 평가방법의 이해" 학지사 2001

    9 탁진국, "심리검사" 학지사 1997

    10 정청희, "스포츠심리학의 이해" 도서출판 금광 1999

    11 한국스포츠심리학회, "스포츠심리학 핸드북" 2005

    12 성창훈, "스포츠맨십 행동의 개념화 시도(Ⅰ): Vallerland의 다차원적 스포츠맨십 구조 타당성 검증" 11 (11): 141-154, 2001

    13 유진, "스포츠 심리측정: 개발과 평가" 한국체육학회 41 (41): 215-232, 2002

    14 "www. koreabasketball.or.kr" 대한농구협회

    15 김청택, "http://qpsy.snu.ac.kr. 심리측정 강의자료"

    16 Vallerland, R. J., "Toward a multidimensional definition of sportmanship" 8 : 89-101, 1996

    17 Marsh, H. S., "The measurement of physical self-concept: A construct validation approach, in The 이용현 15 physical self: From motivation to well-being" Human Kinetics 27-58, 1997

    18 Salas, E., "Teamwork: emerging Principles" 2 (2): 339-356, 2001

    19 Smith-Jentsch, K. A., "Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self- correction, in Making decision under stresss: Implications for individual and team training" American Psycholgical Association 1998

    20 Kelloway, E. K., "Structual equation modeling in perspective" 16 (16): 215-224, 1995

    21 Gill, D. L., "Psychology Dynamics of sport and Exercise" Human Kinetics 2000

    22 Smith-Jentsch, K. A., "Measuring team-related experiene in complex envinments, in Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training" American Psycholgical Association 1998

    23 McIntyre, R. M., "Measuring and managing for team performance:Emerging principles from complex environment, in Team effective ness and decision making in organizations" Jossey -Bass 9-45, 1995

    24 Langfred, C., "Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword?: An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance" 29 (29): 124-143, 1998

    25 Gladstein, D. L., "Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness" 29 (29): 499-517, 1984

    26 Stogdill, R., "Group productivity, drive and cohesiveness" 8 : 26-43, 1972

    27 Weldon, E., "Group goals and group performance" 32 : 307-334, 1993

    28 김계수, "Amos 7.0 구조방정식 모형 분석" 한나래 2007

    29 Marks, M. A., "A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process" 26 (26): 356-377, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.32 1.32 1.66
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.52 1.58 1.732 0.35
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼