RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      9·19 군사합의 성립과 이행 중단 과정의 정책 변동 분석 양면게임 이론과 다중흐름 모형의 통합적 분석틀을 중심으로 = A Policy Change Analysis of the Formation and Suspension of the September 19 Inter-Korean Military Agreement -An Integrated Framework of Two-Level Game Theory and the Multiple Streams Model-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109858508

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The September 19 Inter-Korean Military Agreement (IMA) and its early implementation demonstrated the practical feasibility of arms-control measures on the Korean Peninsula and were hailed as a breakthrough for peace. Nevertheless, a resumption of North Korean military provocations, coupled with repeated violations of the accord, eventually brought implementation to a halt. Armscontrol theory suggests that the conclusion and durability of such agreements depend on a complex interplay of factors, including the international environment, mutual trust and perceptions of force balance, domestic political will, and public opinion.
      Building on this theoretical foundation, the present study identifies the forces that shaped both the formation and suspension of the September 19 IMA and analyzes how they operated within a structural framework. Combining Putnam’s two-level game approach with Kingdon’s multiple-streams framework, the analysis divides the policy trajectory into three phases: (1) Agreement Formation and Early Implementation, (2) Unstable Maintenance, and (3) Agreement Breakdown.
      Findings indicate that the agreement was concluded under a favorable international negotiating climate, strong presidential commitment, a stable domestic political setting, and supportive public opinion. After the collapse of the 2019 Hanoi U.S.- North Korea summit, however, stalled denuclearization talks, accumulating North Korean violations, and a shift in Seoul’s North Korea policy following a change of administration converged to suspend implementation. By structurally unpacking this policy change process, the study highlights the institutional and political conditions required to enhance the prospects for successful future arms-control initiatives on the Korean Peninsula.
      번역하기

      The September 19 Inter-Korean Military Agreement (IMA) and its early implementation demonstrated the practical feasibility of arms-control measures on the Korean Peninsula and were hailed as a breakthrough for peace. Nevertheless, a resumption of Nort...

      The September 19 Inter-Korean Military Agreement (IMA) and its early implementation demonstrated the practical feasibility of arms-control measures on the Korean Peninsula and were hailed as a breakthrough for peace. Nevertheless, a resumption of North Korean military provocations, coupled with repeated violations of the accord, eventually brought implementation to a halt. Armscontrol theory suggests that the conclusion and durability of such agreements depend on a complex interplay of factors, including the international environment, mutual trust and perceptions of force balance, domestic political will, and public opinion.
      Building on this theoretical foundation, the present study identifies the forces that shaped both the formation and suspension of the September 19 IMA and analyzes how they operated within a structural framework. Combining Putnam’s two-level game approach with Kingdon’s multiple-streams framework, the analysis divides the policy trajectory into three phases: (1) Agreement Formation and Early Implementation, (2) Unstable Maintenance, and (3) Agreement Breakdown.
      Findings indicate that the agreement was concluded under a favorable international negotiating climate, strong presidential commitment, a stable domestic political setting, and supportive public opinion. After the collapse of the 2019 Hanoi U.S.- North Korea summit, however, stalled denuclearization talks, accumulating North Korean violations, and a shift in Seoul’s North Korea policy following a change of administration converged to suspend implementation. By structurally unpacking this policy change process, the study highlights the institutional and political conditions required to enhance the prospects for successful future arms-control initiatives on the Korean Peninsula.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼