RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인구정책 수단에서 자기관리 상품으로?: 자궁내장치 피임기술의 사회적 의미변화 = From a Population Policy Instrument to a Self-Care Commodity?: The Changing Social Meanings of the Intrauterine Device

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110206295

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article examines social debates on intrauterine device (IUD) technology to trace its shift from a tool of population control to a product of women’s self-management. Widely promoted in family planning programs in the 1960s and 1970s, IUDs lost public support for contraceptive use after a policy shift toward pronatalism, and today insurance coverage applies only to therapeutic use. This shows that contraception has been treated more as population regulation than as a reproductive right. The article analyzes how the sociocultural meaning of the IUD has changed through the interaction of technological features, population policy, commodification strategies, and women’s bodily experiences. Although marketing discourses of self-care and independent womanhood have displaced the IUD’s negative image as a population control device, reproductive decisions remain individualized as matters of risk management. Today, the IUD is reconfigured within discourses of self-determination and health, but this shift is better understood not as liberation from control, but as a redefinition of bodily norms—one that reframes women’s bodies as projects to be managed, moving from a state-centered framework to the language of the market and consumption.
    번역하기

    This article examines social debates on intrauterine device (IUD) technology to trace its shift from a tool of population control to a product of women’s self-management. Widely promoted in family planning programs in the 1960s and 1970s, IUDs lost ...

    This article examines social debates on intrauterine device (IUD) technology to trace its shift from a tool of population control to a product of women’s self-management. Widely promoted in family planning programs in the 1960s and 1970s, IUDs lost public support for contraceptive use after a policy shift toward pronatalism, and today insurance coverage applies only to therapeutic use. This shows that contraception has been treated more as population regulation than as a reproductive right. The article analyzes how the sociocultural meaning of the IUD has changed through the interaction of technological features, population policy, commodification strategies, and women’s bodily experiences. Although marketing discourses of self-care and independent womanhood have displaced the IUD’s negative image as a population control device, reproductive decisions remain individualized as matters of risk management. Today, the IUD is reconfigured within discourses of self-determination and health, but this shift is better understood not as liberation from control, but as a redefinition of bodily norms—one that reframes women’s bodies as projects to be managed, moving from a state-centered framework to the language of the market and consumption.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼