RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Explicating Tacit and Implicit Knowledge of First Person Use in English Academic Writing

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60170578

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It has traditionally and commonly been held that academic writing is impersonal. However, personal intervention has also been emerging as another strategy in academic text. Despite previous research on first person use in English academic writing, there are still a number of writers who are not comfortable to use first person pronouns or patient with others' using them. The subtle knowledge of first person in academic writing may still remain tacit and implicit. In line with explicating the tacit and implicit knowledge of first person use, this paper carries out a qualitative analysis in terms of two aspects: breaking down existing functions into component subcategories and illustrating single-authoring scholars' use of first person plurals. The case study of 20 Research Articles (RAs) in academic discourse analysis comes up with subdivisions of the two most frequent first person functions: recounting the research process and guiding the reader through the text. The study also shows that single authoring scholars had the reader in mind when using first person plural subject pronouns rather than singular ones. The study draws attention to authorial presence in the teaching of academic writing.
    번역하기

    It has traditionally and commonly been held that academic writing is impersonal. However, personal intervention has also been emerging as another strategy in academic text. Despite previous research on first person use in English academic writing, the...

    It has traditionally and commonly been held that academic writing is impersonal. However, personal intervention has also been emerging as another strategy in academic text. Despite previous research on first person use in English academic writing, there are still a number of writers who are not comfortable to use first person pronouns or patient with others' using them. The subtle knowledge of first person in academic writing may still remain tacit and implicit. In line with explicating the tacit and implicit knowledge of first person use, this paper carries out a qualitative analysis in terms of two aspects: breaking down existing functions into component subcategories and illustrating single-authoring scholars' use of first person plurals. The case study of 20 Research Articles (RAs) in academic discourse analysis comes up with subdivisions of the two most frequent first person functions: recounting the research process and guiding the reader through the text. The study also shows that single authoring scholars had the reader in mind when using first person plural subject pronouns rather than singular ones. The study draws attention to authorial presence in the teaching of academic writing.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. Method
    • Ⅲ. Results and Discussion
    • Ⅳ. Conclusion and Pedagogical Implications
    • References
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. Method
    • Ⅲ. Results and Discussion
    • Ⅳ. Conclusion and Pedagogical Implications
    • References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼