RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      그람시 이데올로기 개념의 형성 = Formation of ideology concept in Gramsci

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5094100

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Gramsci made a special writing titled 『The Concept of Ideology』. But his ideology concept is emphasizing organic ideology as a synthesis of existing ideology theories and a sort of thought weapon with material force, rather than conceptualization. Possibly, The German Ideology is most significant ideology writing made by Marx and Engels. Here, it reveals negative meanings of ideology well. Gramsci never read this writing, but knew well about negative meanings of ideology, and often used the ideology as negative meaning. On the other hand, Gramsci also uses the ideology as positive(or neutral) meaning. He faced Marx`s Preface to The Critique of Political Economy(1859) and Theses on Feuerbach, which contain some paragraphs that hardly seem to point out only the negative meanings of ideology. However, Gramsci uses ideology as positive meaning, possibly because he was more influenced by Engels and Lenin rather than Marx. Although differences between Marx and Engels are still a subtle issue, it is notable that some of their writings contain positive perspectives on ideology, such as The Holy Family (Marx & Engels), Anti~Duhring(Engels) and Ludwig Feuerbach and End of Classical German Philosophy(Engels). Their perspectives are in common with each other in a sense that superstructure is not automatic reflection of base, but may have reactions to the base. This point had possible influences on Gramsci`s concept of positive ideology. Before successful socialist revolution, in 1894 and 1902, Lenin already attached positive implications to the ideology. In addition to successful socialist revolution, Lenin`s standpoint on ideology came to be more convincing. And Gramsci came to use the ideology as a positive meanings mainly under Lenin`s influence. The concept of Marxist ideology involves a transition from negative implications to positive ones, which also entails the standpoints of Engels and Lenin. As for organic ideology, Gramsci explains that ideology comes to have material force. He accepted the ideology as a sort of influential ideal weapon and put stress on the importance of ideologic struggles, because he would aim to cope with consent acquiring strategy of ruling class and also found that acquiring any counter ideology for subject class is so crucial to acquiring hegemony. Ideology aim for hegemony is the material force of ideology and organic ideology. Gramsci reconstructs the perspectives of Marx, Engels and Lenin selectively in order to acquire this organic ideology. And failure to see Gramsci`s ideology concept in viewpoint of historical bloc, as S. Hall or E. Laclau, might lead to extending only positive aspects of ideology. And ultimately it might be used for structuralism or post-structuralism.
      번역하기

      Gramsci made a special writing titled 『The Concept of Ideology』. But his ideology concept is emphasizing organic ideology as a synthesis of existing ideology theories and a sort of thought weapon with material force, rather than conceptualization....

      Gramsci made a special writing titled 『The Concept of Ideology』. But his ideology concept is emphasizing organic ideology as a synthesis of existing ideology theories and a sort of thought weapon with material force, rather than conceptualization. Possibly, The German Ideology is most significant ideology writing made by Marx and Engels. Here, it reveals negative meanings of ideology well. Gramsci never read this writing, but knew well about negative meanings of ideology, and often used the ideology as negative meaning. On the other hand, Gramsci also uses the ideology as positive(or neutral) meaning. He faced Marx`s Preface to The Critique of Political Economy(1859) and Theses on Feuerbach, which contain some paragraphs that hardly seem to point out only the negative meanings of ideology. However, Gramsci uses ideology as positive meaning, possibly because he was more influenced by Engels and Lenin rather than Marx. Although differences between Marx and Engels are still a subtle issue, it is notable that some of their writings contain positive perspectives on ideology, such as The Holy Family (Marx & Engels), Anti~Duhring(Engels) and Ludwig Feuerbach and End of Classical German Philosophy(Engels). Their perspectives are in common with each other in a sense that superstructure is not automatic reflection of base, but may have reactions to the base. This point had possible influences on Gramsci`s concept of positive ideology. Before successful socialist revolution, in 1894 and 1902, Lenin already attached positive implications to the ideology. In addition to successful socialist revolution, Lenin`s standpoint on ideology came to be more convincing. And Gramsci came to use the ideology as a positive meanings mainly under Lenin`s influence. The concept of Marxist ideology involves a transition from negative implications to positive ones, which also entails the standpoints of Engels and Lenin. As for organic ideology, Gramsci explains that ideology comes to have material force. He accepted the ideology as a sort of influential ideal weapon and put stress on the importance of ideologic struggles, because he would aim to cope with consent acquiring strategy of ruling class and also found that acquiring any counter ideology for subject class is so crucial to acquiring hegemony. Ideology aim for hegemony is the material force of ideology and organic ideology. Gramsci reconstructs the perspectives of Marx, Engels and Lenin selectively in order to acquire this organic ideology. And failure to see Gramsci`s ideology concept in viewpoint of historical bloc, as S. Hall or E. Laclau, might lead to extending only positive aspects of ideology. And ultimately it might be used for structuralism or post-structuralism.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼