非法经营罪兜底条款的限缩路径 －以明确性原则为视角－ = The way to limit the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation －From the perspective of the principle of clarity－

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In order to solve the legislative cannot timely response to the new problems brought by the social transformation, the judicial organs will not explicitly stipulated in the criminal law of the illegal management behavior “expansion” to the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation, application expansion variation leads to crime of illegal business out of, severely impact the clarity of the crime legal principle, and leads to abuse the power of criminal penalty and civil rights violations.
The high abstraction in legislation and the alienation in judicature lead to the expansion and variation of the clause of illegal business operation, which in essence is the conflict between the function of protecting human rights and the function of protecting legal interests, and the root cause is the conflict between economic freedom and state intervention. The narrowed ways to resolve the conflict include avoiding the conflict and applying the civil law, administrative law or other specific charges to protect the interests as far as possible. In balancing conflicts, under the premise of protecting the interests of the law, judicial interpretations, guiding cases, indictments and judgments should, as far as possible, implement the principle of clarity. Conflict game, the function of legal interest protection is greater than the function of human rights protection can be applied to the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation.
Through the analysis of the predicament in the judicial application of the provisions on the miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation, the reasons for the expansion and variation of the application are abstractly extracted, the rational analysis is made from the perspective of the principle of clarity, the essence and root of the conflict are dug out, and the narrowed ways are put forward. In order to narrow the abuse of the right of punishment and protect the human rights of citizens, we should narrow the scope of application of the provisions on the underpayment of he miscellaneous provisions of crime of illegal business operation to the maximum extent through the above-mentioned ways to solve the conflicts.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

为了解决立法机关不能及时回应社会转型所带来的新问题, 司法机关将刑法 中没有明确规定的违法经营行为 “扩张解释”到非法经营罪兜底条款之中, 导致 非法经营罪兜底条款扩张变异适用, 严重冲击罪行法定的明确性原则, 并导致 刑罚权的滥用与公民人权的侵犯。 立法上的高度抽象和司法上的异化适用导致非法经营罪兜底条款扩张变异适 用, 究其本质是人权保护机能和法益保护机能的冲突, 究其根源是经济自由与 国家干预的冲突。解决冲突的限缩路径有: 回避冲突, 尽可能适用民法、行政 法或其他特定罪名保护法益; 平衡冲突, 在保护法益的前提下, 司法解释、指导 案例、起诉书、判决书都要尽最大可能贯彻明确性原则; 冲突博弈, 法益保护 的机能大于人权保护的机能时才能适用非法经营罪兜底条款。 通过对非法经营罪兜底条款司法适用中困境进行分析, 抽象提炼出扩张变异 适用的原因, 从明确性原则角度进行理性分析, 挖掘出冲突的本质和根源并有 针对性提出具体的限缩路径。通过上述解决冲突的限缩路径, 最大限度限缩非 法经营罪兜底条款的适用范围, 以限制刑罚权的滥用和保障公民人权。

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 富饶, "非法经营罪堵截条款限制适用" (10) : 2017

2 武良军, "非法经营罪堵截条款异化之研究" (5) : 2014

3 王弘宁, "非法经营罪去 “口袋化” 之路径——以 “入罪”与 “出罪”的双向互动为视角" (9) : 2017

4 吴越, "论经济自由在经济法中的核心价值" (3) : 2008

5 李昌麒, "论经济法语境中的国家干预" (4) : 2008

6 张建军, "论空白罪状的明确性" (5) : 2012

7 孟德斯鸠, "论法的精神 (上册)" 商务印书馆 1982

8 马荣春, "经济犯罪罪状的设计与解释" (5) : 2013

9 丹宁勋爵, "法律的训诫" 法律出版社 1999

10 王利民, "法学方法论" 中国人民大学出版社 2016

11 张明楷, "明确性原则在刑事司法中的贯彻" (4) : 2015

12 张永江, "我国刑法兜底条款司法适用的完善" (9) : 2015

13 陈兴良, "刑法阶层理论: 三阶层与四要件的对比性考察" (5) : 2017

14 黄仲夫, "刑法精义" 犁斋社有限公司出版 2012

15 陈兴良, "刑法的明确性问题: 以 ≪刑法≫第225条第4项为例的分析" (4) : 2011

16 张建军, "刑法明确性原则的机能" (1) : 2013

17 张明楷, "刑法学" 法律出版社 2016

18 杨兴培, "刑民交叉案件的类型分析和破解方法" (4) : 2014

19 高艳东, "信息时代非法经营罪的重生——组织刷单案评析" (2) : 2018

20 高翼飞, "从扩张走向变异: 非法经营罪如何摆脱 “口袋罪”的宿命" (3) : 2012