RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    통변역을 위한 영한대조분석 = Contrastive Analysis of English and Korean for Interpretation and Translation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45009581

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The quality of interpretation and translation is judged by the output. Audience are exposed only to the output of the performance. As such, we find that making the output readable and/or understandable is as important as, if not more, other related parts of training.
    This paper focuses on the contrastive linguistic features between English and Korean. 10 recommendations were made for producing output in natural Korean. The first five are about the choice of word-endings. They virtually say that we must try to avoid the use of pronouns, possessive endings, plural endings, progressive forms and non-animate subject in writing in Korean. The next two, avoiding heavy NP and verbatim translation of English phrasal verbs are also for the naturalness of Korean output. In writing in Korean, these two phrasal characteristics of English should not be transferred into Korean. There are yet other elements that Korean translator of English material should pay attention to, such as the use of passive construction, the choice of subjects and its agreements and finally the difference of Korean and English in using metaphoric expressions.
    These ten elements of conspicuous difference between Korean and English, when violated, will make the output Korean hard to read (listen) or difficulty to understand. These elements when found multiply in one sentence will render Korean output very complex and unnatural. Trainers in translation and interpretation should bear in mind the recommendations made in this paper for more efficacy and eficacy in working as communication moderators.
    번역하기

    The quality of interpretation and translation is judged by the output. Audience are exposed only to the output of the performance. As such, we find that making the output readable and/or understandable is as important as, if not more, other related pa...

    The quality of interpretation and translation is judged by the output. Audience are exposed only to the output of the performance. As such, we find that making the output readable and/or understandable is as important as, if not more, other related parts of training.
    This paper focuses on the contrastive linguistic features between English and Korean. 10 recommendations were made for producing output in natural Korean. The first five are about the choice of word-endings. They virtually say that we must try to avoid the use of pronouns, possessive endings, plural endings, progressive forms and non-animate subject in writing in Korean. The next two, avoiding heavy NP and verbatim translation of English phrasal verbs are also for the naturalness of Korean output. In writing in Korean, these two phrasal characteristics of English should not be transferred into Korean. There are yet other elements that Korean translator of English material should pay attention to, such as the use of passive construction, the choice of subjects and its agreements and finally the difference of Korean and English in using metaphoric expressions.
    These ten elements of conspicuous difference between Korean and English, when violated, will make the output Korean hard to read (listen) or difficulty to understand. These elements when found multiply in one sentence will render Korean output very complex and unnatural. Trainers in translation and interpretation should bear in mind the recommendations made in this paper for more efficacy and eficacy in working as communication moderators.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 통역 번역의 공통점과 차이점
    • Ⅲ. 영한대조분석
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • <참고문헌>
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 통역 번역의 공통점과 차이점
    • Ⅲ. 영한대조분석
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • <참고문헌>
    • <Abstract>
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼