남북한 간의 경제적 상호의존성 측정 = Measuring of economic interdependence between South and North Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The disparity in the theoretical issues as well as in the empirical findings is a set of important questions concerning how to define and measure "economic interdependence" in the literature of debates on the links between economic interdependence and conflict. In this paper, I conceptualized and measured the economic interdependence between South and North Korea based on the Barbieri's and Oneal & Russett's methods. The results of measuring in interdependence by the Barbieri's methods indicate that the trading relationships between South and North Korea is neither extended nor balanced in dependence, and these produced low economic interdependences between the two Koreas. these are the same as the results of measurement by the Oneal & Russett's method.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "Why Democracies Cooperate More and Fight Less: The Relationship Between International Trade and Cooperation" 5 (5): 295-309, 1997

2 "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" W. W. Norton. 2001

3 "Trade, Conflict, and Granger Causality within South and North Korea; Does the Causality Vary Across Goods?,The Conference of International Association of Area Studies 2005 fall" 2005

4 "The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950-1985" 52 : 441-67, 1998

5 "The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict 1950-1985" 33 : 11-28, 1996

6 "The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace Ann Arbor" University of Michigan Press. 2002

7 "The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" 52 : 1-37, 1999b

8 "The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict 1950-1985" 41 : 267-94, 1997

9 "Strategic Trade and Incentives for Cooperation Economic Conversion and the Management of Peace" 273-284, 1992

10 "Sleeping with the Enemy The Impact of War on Trade" 36 (36): 463-479, 1999

11 "Peace through Trade Theory and Economic Exchange Between South and North Korea" 2002

12 "New Tests of the Democratic Peace: Controlling for Economic Interdependence, 1950-85" 50 (50): 751-775, 1997

13 "New Perspectives on Economic Exchange and Armed Conflict" Princeton Princeton University Press 19942003

14 "Measure for Measure: Concept Operationalization and the Trade Interdependence-Conflict Debate" 40 (40): 553-571, 2003

15 "Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model" 36 : 405-22, 1999

16 "Journal of Conflict Resolution 24" 55-78, 1980

17 "Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict" 55 : 391-438, 2001

18 "International Trade and Conflict: The Debatable Relationship" 1998b

19 "International Trade Database (1870-1992)." -1, 1998a

20 "How Could Trade Affect Conflict?" 36 : 481-89, 1999

21 "Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Conflict?" 33 : 29-49, 1996

22 "Economic Interdependence and Militarized Interstate Conflict, 1870-1985" 20-24, 19951870-1985

23 "Economic Exit, Interdependence, and Conflict" 65 (65): 772-792, 2003

24 "Bilateral Trade and Political Conflict/Cooperation: Do Goods Matter?" 35 (35): 1998

25 "Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict" 36 : 423-42, 1999a

26 "An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions In Economics of Arms Reduction and the Peace Process" North-Holland 89-120, 1992

27 "An Economics Approach to Political International Interactions In Economics of Arms Reduction and the Peace Process" North-Holland 89-120, 1992

28 "(IR)Relevance of Militarized Interstate Disputes for International Trade" 46 (46): 11-44, 2002