RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      델파이 豫測과 베이시안 意思決定 = DELPHI FORECASTS AND BAYESIAN APPROACH

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3180275

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Delphi technique which is a method of eliciting and refining group judgments about the future has three features: (1) iteration and controlled feedback: (2) anonymous response: and (3) statistical group response. The primary feature that distinguishes the Delphi from ordinary polling procedures is the feedback of the information gathered from the group and opportunity given participating individuals to modify or refine their judgments based upon their reactions to the collective views of the group. Secondary characteristics, anonymity and collective responses, ovoid undesirable psychological effects for participants. More recently this technique has been used not only to forecast future events but also to generate various types of estimates. Though a number of advantages have teen cited for use of Delphi methodology, the technique itself still is not free of limitations. Many criticisms have been raised about the assumptions and procedures of the Delphi technique or its products.
      Major issues associated with the Delphi applications were : (1) difficulties in the selection of the panel and the design of the Delphi questionnaire: (2) the level of measurement and use of point estimates in the response scale : (3) the process for estimating the reliability of a Delphi study: and (4) the validity of the resulting Delphi panel judgment. The validity of the Delphi forecast is typically measured in terms of the degree of consensus among the panelists as a means of quantitatively getting an "objective" opinion.
      Regardless of the precision of the forecasting methods and the accuracy of the data produced, the justification of a forecast is its utility in planning and decision making. Recently, the Delphi method has been viewed as a process for group decision making within the Bayesian information processing framework. A number of approaches for attaching personal probability assessments and introducing subjective information to a group decision as a means of enhancing Delphi forecasts have been suggested by Bayesian theorists. These include weighted-average methods, natural-conjugate methods, and calibration methods.
      The final fart of the article provides a conceptual model reviewing those theories invlolving Delphi procedures and Bayesian approaches to decision making. In this proposed model, the Delphi method is viewed as a data generating procedure for making a group decision within the Bayesian information processing framework.
      번역하기

      The Delphi technique which is a method of eliciting and refining group judgments about the future has three features: (1) iteration and controlled feedback: (2) anonymous response: and (3) statistical group response. The primary feature that distingui...

      The Delphi technique which is a method of eliciting and refining group judgments about the future has three features: (1) iteration and controlled feedback: (2) anonymous response: and (3) statistical group response. The primary feature that distinguishes the Delphi from ordinary polling procedures is the feedback of the information gathered from the group and opportunity given participating individuals to modify or refine their judgments based upon their reactions to the collective views of the group. Secondary characteristics, anonymity and collective responses, ovoid undesirable psychological effects for participants. More recently this technique has been used not only to forecast future events but also to generate various types of estimates. Though a number of advantages have teen cited for use of Delphi methodology, the technique itself still is not free of limitations. Many criticisms have been raised about the assumptions and procedures of the Delphi technique or its products.
      Major issues associated with the Delphi applications were : (1) difficulties in the selection of the panel and the design of the Delphi questionnaire: (2) the level of measurement and use of point estimates in the response scale : (3) the process for estimating the reliability of a Delphi study: and (4) the validity of the resulting Delphi panel judgment. The validity of the Delphi forecast is typically measured in terms of the degree of consensus among the panelists as a means of quantitatively getting an "objective" opinion.
      Regardless of the precision of the forecasting methods and the accuracy of the data produced, the justification of a forecast is its utility in planning and decision making. Recently, the Delphi method has been viewed as a process for group decision making within the Bayesian information processing framework. A number of approaches for attaching personal probability assessments and introducing subjective information to a group decision as a means of enhancing Delphi forecasts have been suggested by Bayesian theorists. These include weighted-average methods, natural-conjugate methods, and calibration methods.
      The final fart of the article provides a conceptual model reviewing those theories invlolving Delphi procedures and Bayesian approaches to decision making. In this proposed model, the Delphi method is viewed as a data generating procedure for making a group decision within the Bayesian information processing framework.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ.未來豫測 方法
      • 1.探究型
      • 2.規範型
      • 3.直觀型
      • Ⅱ.델파이 方法
      • Ⅰ.未來豫測 方法
      • 1.探究型
      • 2.規範型
      • 3.直觀型
      • Ⅱ.델파이 方法
      • Ⅲ.베이시안 統計方法과 델파이 豫測
      • 1.베이시안 意思決定
      • 2.델파이에 關한 베이시안 觀點
      • 3.集團的 意思決定의 베이시안 方法
      • Ⅴ.델파이 豫測의 베이시안 方法
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼