RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Generativity, eldercare and women's midlife well-being.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10544450

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Research has documented that eldercare often negatively affects women's midlife well-being. However, according to some scholars, midlife may also be women's prime of life; for example, Erikson's (1950/1963) developmental stage of generativity is associated with positive midlife well-being. This study was prompted by the question of the compatibility of these two general findings. Participants were 101 women from a longitudinal study of the Radcliffe Class of 1964 (median age 53), including 36 women who were caregiving for an aging parent or relative.
    This study tested a version of Pearlin et al.'s (1990) caregiver stress model. It was expected that appraisal of caregiving would mediate the relationship between caregiving and psychological well-being; however, in this sample, eldercare was not associated with lower overall well-being. The model also predicted that appraisal would mediate the relationship between generativity and well-being and having a generative perspective on caregiving would mediate that between generativity and appraisal of caregiving. None of these hypotheses were supported.
    However, results showed that caregivers were more anxious than non-caregivers but were not different on depression, zest, or life satisfaction. Caregivers who provided help with several instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) tasks were more anxious and less satisfied than caregivers who helped with fewer IADLs. Analyses suggested that worrying about caregiving may affect more aspects of well-being than caregiving does. The presence of a spouse or sibling related to worry about caregiving and to having a generative perspective on eldercare. Results confirmed that generativity was related to positive well-being but not that women concerned about generativity would be more likely to see the generative benefits in caregiving. Also, caregivers who were caring for a cognitively impaired elder were significantly lower in general generative concern than those caregiving for a cognitively intact individual. Finally, living with one's care-recipient related to lower depression.
    Findings suggest that eldercare and midlife personality may be related in some way, however further research is needed to identify the details of this relationship. Specifically, findings suggest that it might be useful to focus future studies on different contexts (marriage, the presence of siblings) and conditions (type, frequency, duration) of caregiving and how they relate to personality development and other significant markers of midlife, rather than well-being.
    번역하기

    Research has documented that eldercare often negatively affects women's midlife well-being. However, according to some scholars, midlife may also be women's prime of life; for example, Erikson's (1950/1963) developmental stage of generativity is asso...

    Research has documented that eldercare often negatively affects women's midlife well-being. However, according to some scholars, midlife may also be women's prime of life; for example, Erikson's (1950/1963) developmental stage of generativity is associated with positive midlife well-being. This study was prompted by the question of the compatibility of these two general findings. Participants were 101 women from a longitudinal study of the Radcliffe Class of 1964 (median age 53), including 36 women who were caregiving for an aging parent or relative.
    This study tested a version of Pearlin et al.'s (1990) caregiver stress model. It was expected that appraisal of caregiving would mediate the relationship between caregiving and psychological well-being; however, in this sample, eldercare was not associated with lower overall well-being. The model also predicted that appraisal would mediate the relationship between generativity and well-being and having a generative perspective on caregiving would mediate that between generativity and appraisal of caregiving. None of these hypotheses were supported.
    However, results showed that caregivers were more anxious than non-caregivers but were not different on depression, zest, or life satisfaction. Caregivers who provided help with several instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) tasks were more anxious and less satisfied than caregivers who helped with fewer IADLs. Analyses suggested that worrying about caregiving may affect more aspects of well-being than caregiving does. The presence of a spouse or sibling related to worry about caregiving and to having a generative perspective on eldercare. Results confirmed that generativity was related to positive well-being but not that women concerned about generativity would be more likely to see the generative benefits in caregiving. Also, caregivers who were caring for a cognitively impaired elder were significantly lower in general generative concern than those caregiving for a cognitively intact individual. Finally, living with one's care-recipient related to lower depression.
    Findings suggest that eldercare and midlife personality may be related in some way, however further research is needed to identify the details of this relationship. Specifically, findings suggest that it might be useful to focus future studies on different contexts (marriage, the presence of siblings) and conditions (type, frequency, duration) of caregiving and how they relate to personality development and other significant markers of midlife, rather than well-being.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼