RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    韓・中 소비자법제 기본법의 비교

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75210437

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Differences exist between the formation of consumer legal system and the regulations under fundamental consumer protection laws in Korea and China. Nevertheless, the trend in both countries are similar in that consumers' sovereignty has been emphasized and that reliefs for consumers have been strengthened. Moreover, consumers' rights have been strengthened, while the state executives' responsibilities towards consumers have also been strengthened. There are following differences in the consumer legal systems as well as their respective fundamental laws between Korea and China: With respect to legislation, the legislative backgrounds and mechanisms as well as the main norms are different. China is strengthening the consumer protection by prescribing detailed legal liabilities of business operators who infringe consumers' rights and interests, whereas Korea emphasizes on security issues of consumers and thus strengthened consumers' safety through series of amendments. With respect to consumer obligations, Korean law emphasizes on such issue more than China. The Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interest provides the obligation of the state and business operators, but there are no provision on the obligations or responsibilities of consumers. In contrast, Korea's Consumer Fundamental Act in force prescribes the "responsibilities of consumers," thereby emphasizing the obligation of consumer. With respect to obligations of the state and local governments, the Korean law tends to emphasize this issue as well. Consumers must be educated in order to make them being responsible for their own consumer life. Moreover, it is also responsibilities of the state and local governments to enhance consumers' ability as the economy and society develops. Compared with other Asian countries, China have enacted the consumer rights law only in recent years and no amendments have been made yet. But it is expected that the consumer rights law will be amended in the near future with the distinctive Chinese features.
    번역하기

    Differences exist between the formation of consumer legal system and the regulations under fundamental consumer protection laws in Korea and China. Nevertheless, the trend in both countries are similar in that consumers' sovereignty has been emphasi...

    Differences exist between the formation of consumer legal system and the regulations under fundamental consumer protection laws in Korea and China. Nevertheless, the trend in both countries are similar in that consumers' sovereignty has been emphasized and that reliefs for consumers have been strengthened. Moreover, consumers' rights have been strengthened, while the state executives' responsibilities towards consumers have also been strengthened. There are following differences in the consumer legal systems as well as their respective fundamental laws between Korea and China: With respect to legislation, the legislative backgrounds and mechanisms as well as the main norms are different. China is strengthening the consumer protection by prescribing detailed legal liabilities of business operators who infringe consumers' rights and interests, whereas Korea emphasizes on security issues of consumers and thus strengthened consumers' safety through series of amendments. With respect to consumer obligations, Korean law emphasizes on such issue more than China. The Law on the Protection of Consumers' Rights and Interest provides the obligation of the state and business operators, but there are no provision on the obligations or responsibilities of consumers. In contrast, Korea's Consumer Fundamental Act in force prescribes the "responsibilities of consumers," thereby emphasizing the obligation of consumer. With respect to obligations of the state and local governments, the Korean law tends to emphasize this issue as well. Consumers must be educated in order to make them being responsible for their own consumer life. Moreover, it is also responsibilities of the state and local governments to enhance consumers' ability as the economy and society develops. Compared with other Asian countries, China have enacted the consumer rights law only in recent years and no amendments have been made yet. But it is expected that the consumer rights law will be amended in the near future with the distinctive Chinese features.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 언
    • Ⅱ. 소비자법제의 형성과 발전
    • 1. 한국의 소비자법제
    • 2. 중국의 소비자법제
    • Ⅲ. 韓․中소비자법제의 중요내용 비교
    • Ⅰ. 서 언
    • Ⅱ. 소비자법제의 형성과 발전
    • 1. 한국의 소비자법제
    • 2. 중국의 소비자법제
    • Ⅲ. 韓․中소비자법제의 중요내용 비교
    • 1. 입법구조
    • 2. 소비자의 권리와 의무
    • 3. 배상받을 권리
    • 4. 소비자의 능력향상과 소비자정책
    • 5. 소비자단체소송
    • 6. 법률책임
    • Ⅳ. 결 어
    • 참 고 문 헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 법제처, 종합법령정보센타

    2 "한국소비자원"

    3 한상돈, "중국 반독점법의 시행과 유념해야 할 점" 2007

    4 소비자보호부문계획위원회, "제7차 경제사회개발5개년계획 소비자보호부문계획(안)" 1991

    5 박수혁, "우리나라 소비자보호법제의 개선방향" 3 : 1997

    6 송보경, "소비자운동 -저항인가 협력인가" 소비자문제를 연구하는 모임 1988

    7 김성천, "소비자보호형법에 관한 소고" 1997

    8 권오승, "소비자보호법(제5판)" 법문사 2005

    9 김원기, "소비자보호법" 대명출판사 2007

    10 박상룡, "경제법원론" 박영사 2006

    1 법제처, 종합법령정보센타

    2 "한국소비자원"

    3 한상돈, "중국 반독점법의 시행과 유념해야 할 점" 2007

    4 소비자보호부문계획위원회, "제7차 경제사회개발5개년계획 소비자보호부문계획(안)" 1991

    5 박수혁, "우리나라 소비자보호법제의 개선방향" 3 : 1997

    6 송보경, "소비자운동 -저항인가 협력인가" 소비자문제를 연구하는 모임 1988

    7 김성천, "소비자보호형법에 관한 소고" 1997

    8 권오승, "소비자보호법(제5판)" 법문사 2005

    9 김원기, "소비자보호법" 대명출판사 2007

    10 박상룡, "경제법원론" 박영사 2006

    11 양명조, "경제법강의" 신조사 2006

    12 이기수, "경제법(제7판)" 세창출판사 2006

    13 신현윤, "경제법(제2판)" 법문사 2007

    14 강창경, "개정 소비자보호법 해설" 한국소비자보호원 1996

    15 盛杰民, "經濟法槪論" 人民法院出版社 2003

    16 董朝陽, "經濟法" 淸華大學出版社 2007

    17 楊紫, "經濟法" 北京大學出版社 2005

    18 朱 萍, "淺談消費者權益保護法"

    19 回?明, "消費者權益保護法及配套規定新釋新解" 人民法院出版社 2004

    20 馬 原, "消費者權益保護法分解適用集成" 人民法院出版社 2004

    21 吳景明, "消費者權益保護法" 中國政法大學出版社 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-07-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 법학연구 -> 원광법학 KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.47 0.47 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.38 0.35 0.545 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼