RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    追求审判的公正— — 律师博客之观察

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60156525

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Chinarebuiltthelawyersystem 30 years ago, but the role of lawyers in legal practice is still very restricted. There exist many problems in the current judicial system, especially the criminal proceedings, in where the lawyers’ rights are hardly guaranteed. Article 306 of the PRC Criminal Law, a legal provision on evidence fabrication that specifically targets defense attorneys, creates an uneven playing field with prosecutors, and therefore causes some unjust, feigned and misjudged cases. Recent cases where the lawyers were arrested on charges of “suborning perjury”—inciting clients or witnesses to commit perjury, such as “The Li Zhuang Case” and “Beihai, Guangxi Four Lawyers’ Case”, expose the lack of effective protection for lawyers’ rights. As a result, Chinese lawyers have become increasingly more unwilling to take criminal defense cases out of fear of being prosecuted. In order to safeguard their own rights and promote impartial justice, a number of lawyers use blog to disclose materials of cases, cover the trial procedure and exchange views. Through this interaction platform, lawyers who share common needs are able to communicate with each other and together as a team to plead for the defendants. On one hand, especially during the process of trial of high publicity cases, lawyers’ blogs play a major and principal role to communicate the most updated case information to the public, which can not be substituted by traditional media. On the other hand, by posting comments on the lawyers’ blogs and sharing/linkingrelevant blog messages, numerous netizens also express their concern about controversial cases, their support for the human right lawyers, and their demand for just trial. These form a legal landscape unique to contemporary China.
    번역하기

    Chinarebuiltthelawyersystem 30 years ago, but the role of lawyers in legal practice is still very restricted. There exist many problems in the current judicial system, especially the criminal proceedings, in where the lawyers’ rights are hardly guar...

    Chinarebuiltthelawyersystem 30 years ago, but the role of lawyers in legal practice is still very restricted. There exist many problems in the current judicial system, especially the criminal proceedings, in where the lawyers’ rights are hardly guaranteed. Article 306 of the PRC Criminal Law, a legal provision on evidence fabrication that specifically targets defense attorneys, creates an uneven playing field with prosecutors, and therefore causes some unjust, feigned and misjudged cases. Recent cases where the lawyers were arrested on charges of “suborning perjury”—inciting clients or witnesses to commit perjury, such as “The Li Zhuang Case” and “Beihai, Guangxi Four Lawyers’ Case”, expose the lack of effective protection for lawyers’ rights. As a result, Chinese lawyers have become increasingly more unwilling to take criminal defense cases out of fear of being prosecuted. In order to safeguard their own rights and promote impartial justice, a number of lawyers use blog to disclose materials of cases, cover the trial procedure and exchange views. Through this interaction platform, lawyers who share common needs are able to communicate with each other and together as a team to plead for the defendants. On one hand, especially during the process of trial of high publicity cases, lawyers’ blogs play a major and principal role to communicate the most updated case information to the public, which can not be substituted by traditional media. On the other hand, by posting comments on the lawyers’ blogs and sharing/linkingrelevant blog messages, numerous netizens also express their concern about controversial cases, their support for the human right lawyers, and their demand for just trial. These form a legal landscape unique to contemporary China.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 中国司法制度中的律师状况
    • Ⅱ. 律师争取审判公正的努力和风险
    • Ⅲ. 近年来律师博客对案件情况的 “曝光”
    • Ⅳ. 律师博客的影响
    • 参考文献
    • Ⅰ. 中国司法制度中的律师状况
    • Ⅱ. 律师争取审判公正的努力和风险
    • Ⅲ. 近年来律师博客对案件情况的 “曝光”
    • Ⅳ. 律师博客的影响
    • 参考文献
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "陈有西学术网"

    2 "杨金柱博客"

    3 "最高人民法院司法部关于规范法官和律师相互关系维护司法公正的若干规定"

    4 "晨光斋—陈光武律师网"

    5 邓子滨, "我们为什么需要律师" 2011

    6 "刘晓原博客"

    1 "陈有西学术网"

    2 "杨金柱博客"

    3 "最高人民法院司法部关于规范法官和律师相互关系维护司法公正的若干规定"

    4 "晨光斋—陈光武律师网"

    5 邓子滨, "我们为什么需要律师" 2011

    6 "刘晓原博客"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2017-06-01 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean-Chinese Society of Law -> The Korea-China Society of Law KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.14 0.14 0.1
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.1 0.08 0.241 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼