RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      우리나라 국민의 유전자재조합식품에 대한 인지도 및 수용도 변화 = Changes in Korean Consumer's Perception and Attitudes toward Genetically-modified Foods

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105720239

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A survey on consumer's awareness and perception toward genetically-modified(GM) foods was conducted on 2110 random samples of Korean consumers. More than 65% of the respondents were exposed to some information related to GM foods. The respondents answered that the greatest benefit of the development of GM foods is remedy of potential food shortages in the future. More than 90% of Korean consumers wanted GM foods to be labeled as such. More than 50% of the respondents would not buy until they know more about GM foods. Only 35.8% of Korean consumers were found to know that food items originating from plants contained genes. More consumers responded that they would not buy herbicide-resistant GM soybean but buy vitamin-enriched GM soybean. Many Korean consumers' decision of acceptance or rejection of GM foods depend not on the basis of biotechnology, but on the basis of the degree of benefit to the consumers. Only 6.4% of Korean consumers responded that GM foods were the greatest threat to the safety of Korean foods. The perception of Korean consumers on GM foods has not changed significantly during the past 5 years.
      번역하기

      A survey on consumer's awareness and perception toward genetically-modified(GM) foods was conducted on 2110 random samples of Korean consumers. More than 65% of the respondents were exposed to some information related to GM foods. The respondents answ...

      A survey on consumer's awareness and perception toward genetically-modified(GM) foods was conducted on 2110 random samples of Korean consumers. More than 65% of the respondents were exposed to some information related to GM foods. The respondents answered that the greatest benefit of the development of GM foods is remedy of potential food shortages in the future. More than 90% of Korean consumers wanted GM foods to be labeled as such. More than 50% of the respondents would not buy until they know more about GM foods. Only 35.8% of Korean consumers were found to know that food items originating from plants contained genes. More consumers responded that they would not buy herbicide-resistant GM soybean but buy vitamin-enriched GM soybean. Many Korean consumers' decision of acceptance or rejection of GM foods depend not on the basis of biotechnology, but on the basis of the degree of benefit to the consumers. Only 6.4% of Korean consumers responded that GM foods were the greatest threat to the safety of Korean foods. The perception of Korean consumers on GM foods has not changed significantly during the past 5 years.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양주홍, "유전자재조합식품의 표시문제" 153 : 85-93, 2000

      2 경규항, "유전자재조합식품의 소비자 인지도 조사" 식품의약품안전청 2002

      3 Avery, D. T., "Why we need food biotechnology" 54 : 132 -, 2002

      4 Kim, I. S., "Survey of perception on genetically modified foods in Korea. Are Korean consumers safe" 38-45, 1999

      5 Korea Consumer Protection Board, "Survey of consumer perception and sales of genetically-modified foods in Korea" Korea Consumer protection Board 1999

      6 Kim, M. H., "Survey of consumer awareness and attitudes about food biotechnology in Korea" 16 : 152-158, 2001

      7 Hoban, T. J., "Seed trade news (Ball Publ. Batavia, •ð)"

      8 Aerni, P., "Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper No 10" Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper No 10 2001

      9 Fischerhoff, B., "How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits" 9 : 127-152, 1978

      10 Philips, P. W. B., "GMO labeling, threat or opportunity" 1998

      1 양주홍, "유전자재조합식품의 표시문제" 153 : 85-93, 2000

      2 경규항, "유전자재조합식품의 소비자 인지도 조사" 식품의약품안전청 2002

      3 Avery, D. T., "Why we need food biotechnology" 54 : 132 -, 2002

      4 Kim, I. S., "Survey of perception on genetically modified foods in Korea. Are Korean consumers safe" 38-45, 1999

      5 Korea Consumer Protection Board, "Survey of consumer perception and sales of genetically-modified foods in Korea" Korea Consumer protection Board 1999

      6 Kim, M. H., "Survey of consumer awareness and attitudes about food biotechnology in Korea" 16 : 152-158, 2001

      7 Hoban, T. J., "Seed trade news (Ball Publ. Batavia, •ð)"

      8 Aerni, P., "Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper No 10" Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. A comparison between Mexico and the Philippines. Science, Technology and Innovation Discussion Paper No 10 2001

      9 Fischerhoff, B., "How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits" 9 : 127-152, 1978

      10 Philips, P. W. B., "GMO labeling, threat or opportunity" 1998

      11 Lee, K., "Food neophobia, major causes and treatments" 43 : 62-73, 1989

      12 Monsanto Co, "Food biotechnology 7 nations consumers tracking study" Summary of highlights 1999

      13 Kim, M. H., "Consumer awareness and perception of genetically modified foods in Korea; 2000-2001" 17 : 157-165, 2002

      14 Millward Brown Australia, "Biotechnology public awareness survey final report"

      15 Saad, L., "Biotech food remains fairly obscure to most Americans" Gallup News service 2001

      16 Blaine, K., "Backgrounder, an on-farm comparison of agronomic, economic and consumer attitudes of genetically engineered and conventional sweet corn and potatoes in Ontario" 2001

      17 Kim, Y. C., "Attitudes to safety of genetically modified foods in Korea-Focus on food specialist" 14 : 397-407, 1999

      18 Kim, M.H., "A Three-year survey on korean consumer's awareness, perception and attitudes toward genetically-modified foods; years 2000-2002" 32 : 1155-1161, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-07-21 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Sociery Of Food Hygiene And Safety -> The Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.49 0.726 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼