RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Feedback on L2 Writing : The Use of Collaborative Web-based Bulletin Board

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106935486

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study investigates the effects of feedback on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing via two different modes of computer-related communication: peer-editing with a word processor and free discussion on an asynchronous web-based Bulletin Board (BB). The performance of two groups of EFL learners on the writing task was compared to answer to the following questions: 1) Is there any difference between peer editing by a word processor and free discussion on an asynchronous BB in participants’ writing accuracy and writing fluency development? 2) How might asynchronous BB facilitate free discussion on the topic? The results showed that, in general, participants in both groups produced significantly longer essays with fewer errors when given feedback on their drafts. However, a measure of the error-free T-unit indicated that the only statistically significant change between the first and the revised draft was found in the free discussion group by BB. These results may suggest that first, L2 writers who have been exposed to fairly intensive L2 writing experiences may more effectively improve their writing proficiency through indirect ways, such as free discussion, elaboration, and listening to others’ perspective. Secondly, web-based Bulletin Board discussion may facilitate L2 learners’ contextualized interactions, which can lead to reorganization, expansion and selfcorrection of their own writing.
      번역하기

      The present study investigates the effects of feedback on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing via two different modes of computer-related communication: peer-editing with a word processor and free discussion on an asynchronous web-...

      The present study investigates the effects of feedback on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ writing via two different modes of computer-related communication: peer-editing with a word processor and free discussion on an asynchronous web-based Bulletin Board (BB). The performance of two groups of EFL learners on the writing task was compared to answer to the following questions: 1) Is there any difference between peer editing by a word processor and free discussion on an asynchronous BB in participants’ writing accuracy and writing fluency development? 2) How might asynchronous BB facilitate free discussion on the topic? The results showed that, in general, participants in both groups produced significantly longer essays with fewer errors when given feedback on their drafts. However, a measure of the error-free T-unit indicated that the only statistically significant change between the first and the revised draft was found in the free discussion group by BB. These results may suggest that first, L2 writers who have been exposed to fairly intensive L2 writing experiences may more effectively improve their writing proficiency through indirect ways, such as free discussion, elaboration, and listening to others’ perspective. Secondly, web-based Bulletin Board discussion may facilitate L2 learners’ contextualized interactions, which can lead to reorganization, expansion and selfcorrection of their own writing.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. Motivation and Purpose of the Study
      • II. Literature Review
      • III. Method
      • 1. Participants
      • 2. Writing Task
      • I. Motivation and Purpose of the Study
      • II. Literature Review
      • III. Method
      • 1. Participants
      • 2. Writing Task
      • 3. Analysis and results
      • 4. Interpretation of results
      • IV. Discussion
      • V. Limitation and Further Suggestion of the Study
      • VI. Teaching Implications and Conclusion
      • Works Cited
      • ABSTRACT
      • Appendix
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼