RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    발틱 건화물운임지수의 변동성과 뉴스충격

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76047772

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There is little doubt that the volatility of economic variables is, to a degree, forecastable. Therefore, a considerable amount of research has been devoted to predicting this volatility more accurately. This is mainly accomplished by estimating a GARCH model. Most researchers, however, differ on how the predictability of this volatility should be modeled. The most appealing feature of these approaches is that many volatility models have been proposed to incorporate the asymmetric or leverage effect. This study applies the news impact curve as a standard measure of how news is incorporated into volatility estimates. Conclusions are drawn as to the most suitable model after four volatility models are estimated and compared. This paper shows that three leverage models have problems in capturing the correct impact of news on volatility and that negative shocks do not introduce more volatility than positive shocks. Specifically, the GARCH model successfully reveals the shape of the news impact curve and is a useful approach to modeling conditional heteroscedasticity of BDI.
    번역하기

    There is little doubt that the volatility of economic variables is, to a degree, forecastable. Therefore, a considerable amount of research has been devoted to predicting this volatility more accurately. This is mainly accomplished by estimating a GAR...

    There is little doubt that the volatility of economic variables is, to a degree, forecastable. Therefore, a considerable amount of research has been devoted to predicting this volatility more accurately. This is mainly accomplished by estimating a GARCH model. Most researchers, however, differ on how the predictability of this volatility should be modeled. The most appealing feature of these approaches is that many volatility models have been proposed to incorporate the asymmetric or leverage effect. This study applies the news impact curve as a standard measure of how news is incorporated into volatility estimates. Conclusions are drawn as to the most suitable model after four volatility models are estimated and compared. This paper shows that three leverage models have problems in capturing the correct impact of news on volatility and that negative shocks do not introduce more volatility than positive shocks. Specifically, the GARCH model successfully reveals the shape of the news impact curve and is a useful approach to modeling conditional heteroscedasticity of BDI.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 변동성 모형도입
    • Ⅲ. 변동성 모형의 추정과 뉴스충격곡선
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 변동성 모형도입
    • Ⅲ. 변동성 모형의 추정과 뉴스충격곡선
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈부도〉
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "『2004 상반기 해운시황의 특징과 시사점』" 한국해양수산개발원 2004

    2 "The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variance Journal of Financial Economics" 407-432, 1982

    3 "The Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root" eco (eco): 1057-1072, 1981

    4 "The Effects of Model Specification on Tests for Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Data Journal of Monetary Economics" 73-103, 1987

    5 "Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section" 177-181, 1976

    6 "Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87 Review of Financial Studies" 77-102, 1990

    7 "Stationarity and Persistence in the GARCH" eco (eco): 318-334, 1990

    8 "Short and Long-Run Dependency in Swedish Stock Returns" 18 : 435-443, 1998

    9 "On the Relation Between the Expected Value and Volatility of The Nominal Excess Return on Stocks Journal of Finance" 1779-1801, 1993

    10 "On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market Journal of Financial Economics" 323-361, 1980

    1 "『2004 상반기 해운시황의 특징과 시사점』" 한국해양수산개발원 2004

    2 "The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variance Journal of Financial Economics" 407-432, 1982

    3 "The Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root" eco (eco): 1057-1072, 1981

    4 "The Effects of Model Specification on Tests for Unit Roots in Macroeconomic Data Journal of Monetary Economics" 73-103, 1987

    5 "Studies in Stock Price Volatility Changes Proceedings of the 1976 Business Meeting of the Business and Economics Statistics Section" 177-181, 1976

    6 "Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87 Review of Financial Studies" 77-102, 1990

    7 "Stationarity and Persistence in the GARCH" eco (eco): 318-334, 1990

    8 "Short and Long-Run Dependency in Swedish Stock Returns" 18 : 435-443, 1998

    9 "On the Relation Between the Expected Value and Volatility of The Nominal Excess Return on Stocks Journal of Finance" 1779-1801, 1993

    10 "On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market Journal of Financial Economics" 323-361, 1980

    11 "Modelling the Asymmetry of Stock Market Volatility" 8 : 145-153, 1998

    12 "Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility Journal of Finance" 1749-1778, 1993

    13 "Journal of Financial Economics" 3-29, 1987

    14 "Journal of Econometrics" 307-327, 1986

    15 "Journal of Applied Econometrics" 279-294, 1988

    16 "Introduction to Statistical Time Series" 1976

    17 "Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root Journal of the American Statistical Association" 427-431, 1979

    18 "Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns" eco (eco): 347-370, 1991

    19 "An Asymmetric Model of Changing Volatility in Stock Returns Journal of Financial Economics" 81-318, 1992

    20 "Alternative Models for Common Stock Volatility Journal of Econometrics" 267-290, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.99 0.99 0.99
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.94 0.93 1.087 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼