부정청탁방지법안 상 금품 등 수수행위의 직무관련성 -미국 불법사례수수죄를 중심으로- = The Meaning of Relations with Public Duty in the 「Bill on the Prevention of Unjust Solicitations and Conflicts of Interest」-Comparison with Illegal Gratuity Statutes of 18 U.S. Code 201(c)-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently, fierce debates are on the table regarding the 「Bill on the prevention of Unjust Solicitations and Conflicts of Interest」(hereinafter "the Bill") which includes relations with public duty clauses as an element of crime in accepting illegal money, etc. The Bill referred to the Illegal Gratuity Statute of 18 U.S.C 201(c), which includes "for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official" as an intent element. The intent element in illegal gratuity statute has been construed in different ways. The first theory is that its intent means comprehensive relations with the official position itself. The second one is illegal gratuity has to do with specific official act and it should aim at enhancing the possibility of favorable treatment for the provider side. The third analysis is the intent means the mere reward for the specific official act. Korean provision on the accepting illegal money, etc. also needs subjective elements of crime, i.e. relations with public duty clauses considering its gravity in Korean culture and similarity with bribery in its unlawful nature. However, the scope of relations with public duty clauses should be interpreted more broadly than that of illegal gratuity statute in United States because the purpose of legislation in Korea is to stamp out corruption rather than choose illegal gift out of proper lobbyist activity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박상기, "형법각론(제8판)" 박영사 2011

2 손동권, "형법각론 제3개정판" 율곡출판사 2010

3 오영근, "형법각론" 박영사 2009

4 배종대, "형법각론" 홍문사 2012

5 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2010

6 임웅, "형법각론" 법문사 2011

7 국민권익위원회, "부정청탁 금지 및 공직자의 이해충돌 방지법 제정안 주요내용"

8 이성기, "미국의 뇌물, 부정청탁 및 이해충돌방지법에 관한 연구" 미국헌법학회 23 (23): 91-120, 2012

9 정하명, "미국에 있어서 고위공직자에게 요구되는 청렴성, 도덕성의 기준 -미국의 1989년 윤리개혁법을 중심으로-" 9 (9):

10 인터넷 법률신문, "대한변협, ‘김영란법 원안대로 통과시켜야’ 성명" 인터넷 법률신문

11 이동명, "뇌물죄에 있어서의 직무" 한국법학회 2000

12 김홍석, "뇌물의 의미"

13 중앙일보, "김영란법 반쪽 만든 법무부 뭘 겁내나" 중앙일보

14 한겨레신문, "국회, '김영란법' 원안 되살릴까" 한겨레신문

15 경향신문, "공직자 금품수수 땐 처벌 '김영란법' 국무회의 통과" 경향신문

16 이유봉, "공직부패종합대책으로서의 「부정청탁 및 이해충돌방지 법안」에 대한 분석연구" 한국법제연구원 2012

17 Charles B. Klein, "What exactly is an unlawful gratuity after United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers?" 68 : 1999

18 J. Kelly Stader, "Understanding White Collar Crime" Lexisnexis 2011

19 Robert N. Roberts, "Lobbyists beware: the rise of the illegal-gratuity statute" (Winter) : 1996

20 Oliver F. Willams, "Global Codes of Conduct -an idea whose time has come" University of Notre Dame Press 2000

21 Kathleen F. Brickey, "Corporate and White Collar Crime" Wolters Kluwer 2011

22 D. Michael Crites, "A Congres- sional Meat Axe?-New Legislation Would Broaden the Potential for Prosecutions under the Federal Illegal Gratuity Statute" 36 : 2010