월롱~광탄 도로사업 추진방식 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

After re-analyzing the feasibility analysis by LIMAC, it shows that the “Wollong-Gwangtan” section on Local road 360 is not economically feasible to construct with 4 and 2 lanes for round-trip and this work has proposed to construct only 2 lanes for round-trip while reflecting the aspects of road function and the harm that Paju-si has been suffered by Military Protection Area.
After the feasibility analysis by LIMAC, Gyeonggi-do requested an economic feasibility analysis on areas since two changes of traffic condition in affected area for the section have been appeared such as Done IC between Kimpo and Paju on 2nd outer circular road and Paju Hope Project which is placed near the section.
As a result of the two changes of condition required from Gyeonggi-do and Paju-si and analyzing the economical feasibility analysis with supposing unreasonably applied VDF by LIMAC as reasonably improved situation, two constructional alternatives don"t bring any results for economical feasibility and it still will not be appeared later on.
This road section is desirable to construct rapidly with over 2 lanes for both to make Local road 360 which is connected Paju-si to Pocheon-si for 58km keep its local distribution function , the original function, because the whole sections of it excluding 4.6km of road section are operated with 2 lanes and 4 lanes for both ways.
Although this road section is economically not reasonable, it is desirable not only to construct as soon as possible to implement this business which is to connect the section that has been cut off to function the roles of the road, but also to support normal economic activity for the local residents who had been damaged by designating as Military protection area so far.
To make Local road business for Gyeonggi-do carry forward efficiently, it is necessary to join eagerly for the analysis process of LIMAC and should be come up with any alternatives to join as a reviewer since Gyeongi Research Institute is impossible and unresonable to be a person in charge for LIMAC.
Though O/D and Network, the basic date for feasibility analysis, has consistency, they need to be improved since it is estimated that they have been analyzed while ignoring the analysis of LIMAC. Which means even though the analysis of LIMAC is constructed in detail about Network of the Road section that is small scale, there is no VDF reflected on it and it is unreasonably limited to analyze for O/D.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• [표지]
• [정책건의]
• [차례]
• 표차례
• 그림차례
• [제1장 사업개요]
• 1. 사업의 배경 및 목적
• 2. 사업의 추진경위
• 3. 사업내용
• [제2장 기초자료 분석 및 주요쟁점]
• 1. 기초자료 분석
• 2. 주변도로망 및 교통현황
• 3. LIMAC 연구결과
• 4. 주요 쟁점사항
• [제3장 분석기준 및 수요예측과정]
• 1. 분석기준
• 2. 수요예측 사전과정
• [제4장 장래 교통수요 예측결과]
• 1. 분석 시나리오
• 2. 수요예측방법
• 3. 수요예측결과
• [제5장 경제성 분석]
• 1. 편익 산정
• 2. 비용 산출
• 3. 경제성 분석 결과
• [제6장 결론 및 정책제안]
• 결론
• 정책분석
• [참고문헌]
• [Abstract]
• [부록]