受益者負擔金制의 發展方向에 관한 硏究 : 淸州市 道路 受益者負擔金 事例를 中心으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The special assessment is to impose them taxes on the benifit coming out of the enforcement of the public investment when the enforcement of the public improvement gives the great benifits to the owners of the real asset in a particular area.
The aims to impose taxes on the benificiary are as follows:
1. It is to recapture the windfall profits. It is desirable to recapture the windfall income from the public improvement because the increase of land price resulting from the betterment policy or the investment can be not only an interference with the reasonable use of the land, but also a cause of speculation.
2. It is to get the social equalization through the special assessment as it is against the fair distribution of wealth for the landowners in a particular area to gain the special benifit from the public improvement invested by taxes.
3. It is to raise the fund for the public investment through the recapture of the windfall benifit and reinvest it in another public investment. The special assessment and actual state of management are analysed through the cases. The analysis of the cases of the special assessment is based on those carried out in Chongju city.
The aim of this thesis is contributed to the development of the special assessment and the recapture of the windfall benifit resulting from the various public investment.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• I. 序論 = 1
• A. 硏究의 目的 = 1
• B. 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 2
• C. 硏究의 期待效果 = 3
• II. 受益者負擔金制의 理論的 背景 = 5
• A. 受益者負擔金制의 意義 = 5
• 1. 受益者負擔金制의 槪念 = 5
• 2. 受益者負擔金制의 機能 = 6
• B. 受益者負擔制의 特徵 = 7
• 1. 公用負擔的 性格 = 7
• 2. 負擔配分的 性格 = 10
• 3. 行政「서어비스」 費用負擔 = 12
• 4. 開發利益 還收의 一種 = 14
• C. 受益者負擔金制의 變遷 = 21
• 1. 受益者負擔金制 = 21
• 2. 道路受益者負擔金制 = 24
• III. 淸州市 道路受益者負擔金 事例 = 33
• A. 賦課徵收 節次 및 範圍 = 33
• 1. 節次 = 33
• 2. 範圍 = 38
• B. 事例 = 40
• 1. 土黨公園-壽洞1橋間 小河川覆蓋 = 40
• 2. 商業銀行-南州洞間 道路擴張 = 44
• C. 問題點 = 45
• 1. 住民의 抵抗 = 45
• 2. 社會的 衡平性造成의 未治 = 47
• 3. 制度의 不合理點 = 49
• IV. 受益者負擔金制의 發展方向 = 53
• A. 制度的 側面 = 53
• 1. 法規定의 現實化 = 53
• 2. 評價의 合理性 圖模 = 55
• B. 管理的 側面 = 57
• 1. 住民參與에 의한 負擔 = 57
• 2. 積極的 施行 = 59
• V. 結論 = 63
• ·參考文獻 = 80
• ·英文要約 = 83