The concept of ‘Overcoming Japan’ (Geuk-il) originated in the early 1980s, advocating for surpassing Japan through capability development rather than anti-Japanese sentiment. However, in the sports sphere, a simplified interpretation of ‘Overcom...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The concept of ‘Overcoming Japan’ (Geuk-il) originated in the early 1980s, advocating for surpassing Japan through capability development rather than anti-Japanese sentiment. However, in the sports sphere, a simplified interpretation of ‘Overcom...
The concept of ‘Overcoming Japan’ (Geuk-il) originated in the early 1980s, advocating for surpassing Japan through capability development rather than anti-Japanese sentiment. However, in the sports sphere, a simplified interpretation of ‘Overcoming Japan in Sports’—merely achieving victory against Japan—proliferated later, in the 1990s. Following the year 2000, Korea entered a new environment marked by the opening of Japanese popular culture, a narrowing economic gap, and changes in domestic sports culture.
This article analyzes the quantitative trends and qualitative content changes in the ‘Overcoming Japan in Sports’ discourse post-2000 in order to determine if it became stronger or adopted new characteristics.
Quantitatively, the discourse weakened. The average annual frequency, based on five newspaper media, decreased to 2.72 cases, representing approximately 56.7% of the 4.8 cases observed before 2000.
Qualitatively, the discourse was categorized into six types. The simplified discourse focused on immediate Korea-Japan match victories remained quantitatively dominant, however the most significant shift was the emergence of a discourse critical of overcoming Japan in the sporting arena. Further observations indicate that younger generations are less accepting of discourse about overcoming Japan, and instead demand for fair competition, suggesting that the existing narrative faces logical and realistic limitations.
The study concludes that while nationalism and the ‘Overcoming Japan in Sports’ discourse will not disappear, in the future the landscape will be fluid. Unlike the period before 2000, when the simplified discourse held a monopolistic position, the future will be characterized by competition between, and the mixing of, various types of discourse, including the newly emerging critical perspective.
해방 후 한국 의학박사 학위 제도의 사회사: 1945∼1979
일본의 ‘생활자’ 개념으로 본 고도 소비사회의 주체 호명과 ‘저항하는 주체’론의 임계
‘측량하는 시선’과 욕망의 지리 — 1970년대 제주도 ‘남국 풍치’ 담론과 경관 정치
제인 제이콥스의 ‘도시적 상상력’에 대한 사회학적 독해 — 모더니즘적 도시계획과의 대결을 중심으로