RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    삼위일체론적 성경본체론 회복의 필요성에 대한 고찰: 언어행위 이론(Speech-act theory)의 통찰을 활용하여 = A Thought on the Need to Retrieve a Trinitarian Ontology of Scripture: In the Light of Speech-act Theory

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99618578

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The overarching aim of this study is to emphasize the urgent need to retrieve an ontology of Scripture in order to overcome the fatal weakness of a functional bibliology, and to suggest ``a trinitarian ontology of Scripture`` as a more promising theological account of Scripture. Facing the challenge of postmodernism, postliberal theology attempts to restore Scripture`s authority in terms of the function of Scripture, which forms the identity of the faith communities and transforms them in the concrete life situations. Put differently, by way of attributing the authority of Scripture to ``the use of Scripture by the community`` instead of ``the intrinsic property of Scripture,`` postliberal`s functional bibliology fails to do full justice to the relationship of Scripture with the triune God. In spite of its contribution to rediscover the importance of the interpreting community by linking intimately Scripture with the community, a postliberal view of Scripture lacks a dogmatic and ontological account of Scripture, which considers Scripture to have an external and objective authority as the viva vox Dei. From this emerges the need to retrieve an ontological view of Scripture, which claims to begin with talk of Scripture from the relation of Scripture with God who speaks in and through it. On account of the centrality of the doctrine of the triune God and the pattern of authority, a Christian account of Scripture ought to be, above all, a ``trinitarian ontology of Scripture,`` which could provide our talk of Scripture with an interpretative framework to understand both ontology and function, authority and performance, and meaning and embodiment in a more integrated way. Appropriating the concepts and insights of speech-act theory, we can speak of Scripture as ``the triune God`s communicative-performative speech-act.`` Scripture as God`s communicative speech-act makes us the people of God and brings us into the covenantal relation with God in the economy of divine revelation and redemption. In this sense, Scripture as God`s mighty speech-act is also ``God`s covenantal speech-act.`` Surely, the supreme authority of Scripture is rooted in ``the divine use of Scripture``, not ``the churchly use of it.`` The interpretation, performance, and embodiment of Scripture in the life of the community is the subsequent consequence of the divine use and performance of it, and thus cannot be the root of Scripture`s authority. Furthermore, a trinitarian ontological view of Scripture recognizes anew the hermeneutical significance of the Spirit in talk of Scripture and by so doing reaffirms ``the mutual bond of the Word and the Spirit,`` one of the Reformed thoughts on Scripture.
    번역하기

    The overarching aim of this study is to emphasize the urgent need to retrieve an ontology of Scripture in order to overcome the fatal weakness of a functional bibliology, and to suggest ``a trinitarian ontology of Scripture`` as a more promising theol...

    The overarching aim of this study is to emphasize the urgent need to retrieve an ontology of Scripture in order to overcome the fatal weakness of a functional bibliology, and to suggest ``a trinitarian ontology of Scripture`` as a more promising theological account of Scripture. Facing the challenge of postmodernism, postliberal theology attempts to restore Scripture`s authority in terms of the function of Scripture, which forms the identity of the faith communities and transforms them in the concrete life situations. Put differently, by way of attributing the authority of Scripture to ``the use of Scripture by the community`` instead of ``the intrinsic property of Scripture,`` postliberal`s functional bibliology fails to do full justice to the relationship of Scripture with the triune God. In spite of its contribution to rediscover the importance of the interpreting community by linking intimately Scripture with the community, a postliberal view of Scripture lacks a dogmatic and ontological account of Scripture, which considers Scripture to have an external and objective authority as the viva vox Dei. From this emerges the need to retrieve an ontological view of Scripture, which claims to begin with talk of Scripture from the relation of Scripture with God who speaks in and through it. On account of the centrality of the doctrine of the triune God and the pattern of authority, a Christian account of Scripture ought to be, above all, a ``trinitarian ontology of Scripture,`` which could provide our talk of Scripture with an interpretative framework to understand both ontology and function, authority and performance, and meaning and embodiment in a more integrated way. Appropriating the concepts and insights of speech-act theory, we can speak of Scripture as ``the triune God`s communicative-performative speech-act.`` Scripture as God`s communicative speech-act makes us the people of God and brings us into the covenantal relation with God in the economy of divine revelation and redemption. In this sense, Scripture as God`s mighty speech-act is also ``God`s covenantal speech-act.`` Surely, the supreme authority of Scripture is rooted in ``the divine use of Scripture``, not ``the churchly use of it.`` The interpretation, performance, and embodiment of Scripture in the life of the community is the subsequent consequence of the divine use and performance of it, and thus cannot be the root of Scripture`s authority. Furthermore, a trinitarian ontological view of Scripture recognizes anew the hermeneutical significance of the Spirit in talk of Scripture and by so doing reaffirms ``the mutual bond of the Word and the Spirit,`` one of the Reformed thoughts on Scripture.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼