Arbitration at the Olympics : issues of fast-track dispute resolution and sports law

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS = ⅸ
• Ⅰ INTRODUCTION : FROM ATLANTA TO SYDNEY = l
• Atlanta or the first days = 1
• Nagano or adolescence = 2
• Sydney or the age of maturity = 2
• And what about the courts? = 3
• How to use this book? = 4
• Broader perspective on contemporary dispute resolution = 4
• Ⅱ ARBITRATION AT THE SYDNEY OLYMPIC GAMES = 7
• 1. Sydney and arbitration - or how fast can arbitrators go? = 7
• 1. The ad hoc Division and its arbitration rules = 7
• 2. The Sydney cases = 9
• 2.1 Overview = 9
• 2.2 Perez = 11
• 2.2.1 Facts. = 11
• 2.2.2 Act 1 : Rule 46 OC = 12
• 2.2.3 Act 2 : Statelessness under international standards = 12
• 2.2.4 Act 3 : Due process and speed = 13
• 2.2.5 Addendum : Miranda, another Cuban eligibility dispute = 14
• 2.3 Baumann = 15
• 2.3.1 Facts = 15
• 2.3.2 Jurisdiction = 15
• 2.3.3 Res judicata = 16
• 2.3.4 Merits = 17
• 2.4 Melinte = 17
• 2.4.1 Facts and procedure = 17
• 2.4.2 Jurisdiction = 18
• 2.4.3 Merits in expedited form. = 18
• 2.5 Segura = 19
• 2.5.1 Facts and arguments = 19
• 2.5.2 Arbitrability = 19
• 2.5.3 Merits = 20
• 3. Selected issues = 20
• 3.1 Place of arbitration = 20
• 3.2 Jurisdiction = 22
• 3.2.1 Raguz and multiparty arbitration scheme = 22
• 3.2.2 Jurisdiction of the ad hoc Division = 23
• a) Athletes = 23
• b) IFs = 24
• c) NOCs = 24
• d) National federations = 25
• e) Organising Committee of the Olympic Games = 25
• f) Manufacturers of sports equipment = 25
• 3.3 Arbitrability = 25
• 3.4 Law applicable to the merits = 27
• 3.4.1 General principles of law = 27
• 3.4.2 Ascertaining the law - or do you need to prove the law? = 27
• 4. How fast can arbitrators go? = 30
• 4.1 The need for speed = 30
• 4.2 Achieving speed = 31
• 4.3 Hurdles and how to overcome them = 32
• 4.3.1 Anti-arbitration injunction, parallel proceedings, and lis pendens = 32
• 4.3.2 Identifying and joining the parties = 34
• 4.3.3 Due process : notice and evidence taking - or how fast can parties go? = 36
• a) Notice = 37
• b) Evidence taking = 38
• 2. Memorandum on the CAS ad hoc Division = 41
• 1. Parties and disputes = 41
• 2. Structure of the CAS ad hoc Division = 41
• 3. Arbitration Rules = 43
• 3.1 Integral part of Code = 43
• 3.2 Course of arbitration. = 43
• Application = 43
• Formation of the arbitral tribunal = 43
• Interim Relief = 43
• Hearing and evidence = 44
• Full power to establish the facts = 44
• Law governing the merits = 44
• Award = 44
• Referral to usual CAS arbitration = 45
• Publication = 45
• 3.3 Compliance with fundamental principles of natural justice = 45
• 4. Jurisdiction of the CAS ad hoc Division = 46
• 5. Place or "seat" of arbitration = 47
• 5.1 Seat in Lausanne = 47
• 5.2 Reasons for choice of seat = 47
• 5.3 The seat : a legal connection = 49
• 6. Municipal law governing the arbitration = 50
• 3. Raguz v. Sullivan : New South Wales Court of Appeal 1 September 2000 = 51
• 4. Raducan v. International Olympic Committee : Swiss Supreme Court, 4 December 2000 = 80
• 4.1 English translation = 80
• 4.2 Original French version = 81
• Ⅲ ARBITRATION AT THE NAGANO OLYMPIC GAMES NAGANO AND ARBITRATION - OR TOWARDS A PROXIMATE JUSTICE = 95
• 1. Introduction = 95
• 2. The CAS In Nagano = 95
• 2.1 Rebagliati v IOC = 95
• 2.2 Samuelsson v. International Ice Hockey Federation = 97
• 2.3 Other proceedings = 99
• 3. Three topics for consideration = 100
• 3.1 The law governing the merits : globalization by the application of general principles of law = 100
• 3.2 The law governing the arbitration procedure : (de)localization by fixing the seat at Lausanne = 101
• 3.3 Resolving disputes : a proximate system of justice = 103
• Ⅳ ARBITRATION AT THE ATLANTA GAMES ARBITRATION AND THE GAMES OR THE FIRST EXPERIENCE OF THE OLYMPIC DIVISION OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT = 105
• 1. Goal : fair, fast and free = 105
• 2. Structure = 106
• 3. Legal framework = 106
• 3.1 Jurisdiction = 106
• 3.2 Applicable procedural rules and seat of the arbitration = 107
• 3.3 Rules applicable to merits of the dispute = 108
• 4. Course of the arbitration = 109
• 5. Practical organization = 110
• 6. Cases submitted to the Olympic Division = 111
• 6.1 US Swimming v. FINA = 111
• 6.2 Andrade, White and Little v. NOC Cape Verde = 112
• 6.3 Andrade 2 = 112
• 6.4 Mendy v. AIBA = 113
• 6.5 Korneev and Russian NOC v. IOC ; Gouliev and Russian NOC v. IOC = 114
• 7. Conclusions : what lessons are to be learned? = 115
• Ⅴ CAS ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES = 117
• 1. Arbitration Rules for the Games of the XXVII Olympiad in Sydney = 118
• 2. R$$\grave e$$glement d'arbitrage pour les Jeux de la XXVII$$\grave e$$me Olympiade $$\grave a$$ Sydney = 119
• Ⅵ STANDARD FORMS USED BY THE CAS AD HOC DIVISION = 135
• 1. Standard request for arbitration = 136
• 2. Summons to appear = 142
• INDEX = 145
• SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY = 149
• LIST OF CITED AWARDS AND CASES = 155
• CAS ad hoc Division awards = 155
• Other CAS awards = 158
• Court cases = 159
• ABREVIATIONS = 161