RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영국법상 보험계약조건에 대한 연구 = A Study on the Insurance Contract Terms in English Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76384121

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article deals with English law relating to insurance contract terms, which is often referred to for a comparative research in Korea. English insurance contract terms are regarded as various, and considerably harsh and strict upon the insured. In particular, the warranty and the clause limiting the risk are particularly harsh and strict according to the current English law thereabout. However, the recent trend of protecting financial consumers, and the necessity for adjusting the existing law to the change of insurance contract circumstances have prompted a severe criticism against the favor of the current law for the insurer. It is not surprising that the English Law Commission published the working paper in 2006 and the consultation paper in 2007 for the purpose of reforming the law about the warranty and the clause limiting the risk, and are now preparing for the final report. This article analyses and evaluates the current English law and the above working paper by the English Law Commission, and finds their implications for the Korean law thereon. This article concludes as follows. Firstly, the above working paper suggests that the requirements and the effect of insurance contract terms be differentiated according to their kinds and the sorts of insureds such as the retail insured or the business insured. This desirable proposal seems also applicable to the Korean law which does not recognise it. Secondly, the above working paper also suggests that the insurer can be exempted from its liability only when the breach of an insurance contract term is causally connected to the loss. However, regarding the level of causal connection it does not require `cause the loss`, but `increase the risk` or `contribute the loss`. It might be said that this requirement gives little help to the protection of the insured, and therefore needs to be reconsidered.
    번역하기

    This article deals with English law relating to insurance contract terms, which is often referred to for a comparative research in Korea. English insurance contract terms are regarded as various, and considerably harsh and strict upon the insured. In ...

    This article deals with English law relating to insurance contract terms, which is often referred to for a comparative research in Korea. English insurance contract terms are regarded as various, and considerably harsh and strict upon the insured. In particular, the warranty and the clause limiting the risk are particularly harsh and strict according to the current English law thereabout. However, the recent trend of protecting financial consumers, and the necessity for adjusting the existing law to the change of insurance contract circumstances have prompted a severe criticism against the favor of the current law for the insurer. It is not surprising that the English Law Commission published the working paper in 2006 and the consultation paper in 2007 for the purpose of reforming the law about the warranty and the clause limiting the risk, and are now preparing for the final report. This article analyses and evaluates the current English law and the above working paper by the English Law Commission, and finds their implications for the Korean law thereon. This article concludes as follows. Firstly, the above working paper suggests that the requirements and the effect of insurance contract terms be differentiated according to their kinds and the sorts of insureds such as the retail insured or the business insured. This desirable proposal seems also applicable to the Korean law which does not recognise it. Secondly, the above working paper also suggests that the insurer can be exempted from its liability only when the breach of an insurance contract term is causally connected to the loss. However, regarding the level of causal connection it does not require `cause the loss`, but `increase the risk` or `contribute the loss`. It might be said that this requirement gives little help to the protection of the insured, and therefore needs to be reconsidered.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 양승규, "해상보험법"

    2 박헌목, "해상보험계약상 워런티(warranty)위반에 관한 고찰" 한국해사법학회 10 (10): 1998

    3 박은경, "워런티(Warranty) 위반에 관한 국내 판례 연구" 한국해사법학회 15 (15): 155-184, 2003

    4 김선정, "영미보험법상 워런티 법리의 동향" 11 : 1992

    5 손주찬, "상법(하)"

    6 김성태, "보험법강론"

    7 최준선, "보험법⋅해상법"

    8 최기원, "보험법"

    9 양승규, "보험법"

    10 이기수, "보험⋅해상법"

    1 양승규, "해상보험법"

    2 박헌목, "해상보험계약상 워런티(warranty)위반에 관한 고찰" 한국해사법학회 10 (10): 1998

    3 박은경, "워런티(Warranty) 위반에 관한 국내 판례 연구" 한국해사법학회 15 (15): 155-184, 2003

    4 김선정, "영미보험법상 워런티 법리의 동향" 11 : 1992

    5 손주찬, "상법(하)"

    6 김성태, "보험법강론"

    7 최준선, "보험법⋅해상법"

    8 최기원, "보험법"

    9 양승규, "보험법"

    10 이기수, "보험⋅해상법"

    11 Patterson, "Warranties in Insurance Law" 34 : 595-, 1934

    12 Atiyah, "The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract" Oxford University Press 1979

    13 Oldham, "The Mansfield Manuscripts and the Growth of English Law in the Eighteenth Century, vol 1"

    14 Bennet, "The Law of Marine Insurance" Oxford University Press 2006

    15 Clarke, "The Law of Insurance Contracts" Informa 2006

    16 Treitel, "The Law of Contract" Sweet & Maxwell 1999

    17 Hasson, "The Doctrine of Uberrima Fides in Insurance Law - A Critical Evaluation" 32 : 615-, 1969

    18 Hasson, "The Basis of the Contract Clause" 34 : 29-, 1971

    19 Law Commission, "Reforming Insurance Contract Law: A Summary of Responses to Consultation"

    20 Clarke, "Policies and Perspectives of Insurance Law in the Twenty-First Century" Oxford University Press 2005

    21 Law Commission, "Non-disclosure and Breach of Warranty" (104) : 1980

    22 Birds, "Modern Insurance Law" Sweet & Maxwell 2007

    23 Law Commission, "Misrepresentation and Non-Disclosure"

    24 Legh-Jones, "MacGillivray on Insurance Law" Sweet & Maxwell 2008

    25 Hodges, "Law of Marine Insurance" Cavendish Publishing 1996

    26 "Law Issues Paper 1"

    27 Lowry, "Insurance Law Doctrines and Principles" Hart Publishing 2005

    28 Hodgin, "Insurance Law" Cavendish Publishing 2002

    29 Australian Law Reform Commission, "Insurance Contracts"

    30 Law Commission, "Insurance Contract Law: Misrepresentation, Non-disclosure and Breach of Warranty by the Insured, A Joint Consultation Paper"

    31 Law Commission, "Insurance Contract Law Issues Paper 2"

    32 Wedderburn, "Collateral Contracts" 57-, 1959

    33 Colinvaux, "Arnold’s Law of Marine Insurance and Average" Stevens 1981

    34 Beatson, "Anson’s Law of Contract" Oxford University Press 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.55 1.55 1.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.24 1.24 1.583 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼