RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    은행의 대출채권 유동화를 이용한 이익조정 = Earnings Management by Banks through Asset Securitization

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95939267

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Securitization is the process of transferring illiquid assets such as loans, mortgages, and leases to third parties. Banks use securitization as not only a source of funding but also a tool for regulatory and other purposes such as meeting analysts` earnings forecasts, regulatory capital, or debt covenants. Bank loans are transferred to a special purpose company (SPC) which issues multiple classes of asset backed securities (ABS) on the cash flows from the transferred loans. The senior ABS are sold to investors. The most subordinated ABS (SABS) are retained by the banks and they are usually large enough to insulate investors from all kinds of losses from the transferred loans. Figure 1 illustrates the basic structure of securitization. According to current accounting standards, securitization transactions can be accounted for as sales or secured borrowings. A transfer of loans in which the transferor surrenders control over transferred assets is considered a sale. In a sale, a bank removes those loans from the balance sheet. Securitizations that are accounted for as sales may be used to manage earnings, regulatory capital, and debt covenants. Bank executives have incentives to manage earnings using securitizations to affect contracts that rely on reported financial numbers. Under the Korean Banking Act, when a bank is in severe violation of capital requirement(such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) capital adequacy ratio), regulators can close the bank. Regulatory capital requirements have widely been proposed as a main motivation for securitization. Also, banks must maintain an adequate liquidity level and debt ratio to prevent a moral hazard problem caused by deposit insurance and other government`s guarantees. The purpose of this study is to investigate under what environments banks acquire SABS through securitizations. It is hypothesized that the portion of SABS to total securitization (SABS ratio) is negatively correlated with unexpected earnings and BIS capital adequacy ratio, but positively correlated with debt ratio The sample consists of 65 commercial and local banks between 1999 and 2005 (Table 2). In my research models, the dependent variable is SABS ratio, and the independent variables are unexpected earnings, BIS capital adequacy ratio, and debt ratio. The descriptive statistics are presented in Table 3. Table 4 shows the results of univariate tests. Even though earnings manage- ment hypothesis is statistically rejected, regulatory capital hypothesis and debt ratio hypothesis are accepted. In other words, the less the BIS capital adequacy ratio is, or the higher debt ratio is, the more SABS are found to be acquired. Furthermore, unexpected earnings are found not to be related with SABS ratio. Table 6 indicates the estimated results of the research models. This multivariate analysis supports the debt ratio hypothesis, but does not support the earnings management hypothesis and regulatory capital hypothesis. The insights gleaned from this paper can be helpful when regulatory authorities establish policies on banks` loan and SABS accounting practice.
    번역하기

    Securitization is the process of transferring illiquid assets such as loans, mortgages, and leases to third parties. Banks use securitization as not only a source of funding but also a tool for regulatory and other purposes such as meeting analysts` e...

    Securitization is the process of transferring illiquid assets such as loans, mortgages, and leases to third parties. Banks use securitization as not only a source of funding but also a tool for regulatory and other purposes such as meeting analysts` earnings forecasts, regulatory capital, or debt covenants. Bank loans are transferred to a special purpose company (SPC) which issues multiple classes of asset backed securities (ABS) on the cash flows from the transferred loans. The senior ABS are sold to investors. The most subordinated ABS (SABS) are retained by the banks and they are usually large enough to insulate investors from all kinds of losses from the transferred loans. Figure 1 illustrates the basic structure of securitization. According to current accounting standards, securitization transactions can be accounted for as sales or secured borrowings. A transfer of loans in which the transferor surrenders control over transferred assets is considered a sale. In a sale, a bank removes those loans from the balance sheet. Securitizations that are accounted for as sales may be used to manage earnings, regulatory capital, and debt covenants. Bank executives have incentives to manage earnings using securitizations to affect contracts that rely on reported financial numbers. Under the Korean Banking Act, when a bank is in severe violation of capital requirement(such as the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) capital adequacy ratio), regulators can close the bank. Regulatory capital requirements have widely been proposed as a main motivation for securitization. Also, banks must maintain an adequate liquidity level and debt ratio to prevent a moral hazard problem caused by deposit insurance and other government`s guarantees. The purpose of this study is to investigate under what environments banks acquire SABS through securitizations. It is hypothesized that the portion of SABS to total securitization (SABS ratio) is negatively correlated with unexpected earnings and BIS capital adequacy ratio, but positively correlated with debt ratio The sample consists of 65 commercial and local banks between 1999 and 2005 (Table 2). In my research models, the dependent variable is SABS ratio, and the independent variables are unexpected earnings, BIS capital adequacy ratio, and debt ratio. The descriptive statistics are presented in Table 3. Table 4 shows the results of univariate tests. Even though earnings manage- ment hypothesis is statistically rejected, regulatory capital hypothesis and debt ratio hypothesis are accepted. In other words, the less the BIS capital adequacy ratio is, or the higher debt ratio is, the more SABS are found to be acquired. Furthermore, unexpected earnings are found not to be related with SABS ratio. Table 6 indicates the estimated results of the research models. This multivariate analysis supports the debt ratio hypothesis, but does not support the earnings management hypothesis and regulatory capital hypothesis. The insights gleaned from this paper can be helpful when regulatory authorities establish policies on banks` loan and SABS accounting practice.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "http://www.fss.or.kr"

    2 "The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation" 840-855, 1993

    3 Yoon, S, "The Theory and Practice of Asset Securitization. Samilinfomine" Printed in Korean 1999

    4 Ryu, S, "The Sales Criteria of Financial Asset Securitization : Comparison among FAS 140, Securitization Law, and Korean GAAP" Printed in Korean 15 (15): 197-224, 2006

    5 Berger, A, "The Role of Capital in Financial Institutions" 19 : 393-430, 1995

    6 Cha, H, "The Present State and Future of Korean ABS Market" Printed in Korean 4 : 51-73, 2001

    7 Kim, S, "The Effects of Capital Regulation on the Bank Portfolio" Printed in Korean 2002

    8 Daley, "The Effect of Debt Covenants and Political Costs on the Choice of Accounting Methods The Case of Accounting for R&D Costs Journal of Accounting and Economics 5" 1983195-211

    9 Karaoglu, E, "Regulatory Capital and Earnings Management in Banks: The Case of Loan Sales and Securitizations" 2004

    10 Cho, H, "Recognition Incentives for Write-offs of Long-lived asset and Value Relevance" Printed in Korean 31 (31): 1-34, 2006

    1 "http://www.fss.or.kr"

    2 "The Timing of Asset Sales and Earnings Manipulation" 840-855, 1993

    3 Yoon, S, "The Theory and Practice of Asset Securitization. Samilinfomine" Printed in Korean 1999

    4 Ryu, S, "The Sales Criteria of Financial Asset Securitization : Comparison among FAS 140, Securitization Law, and Korean GAAP" Printed in Korean 15 (15): 197-224, 2006

    5 Berger, A, "The Role of Capital in Financial Institutions" 19 : 393-430, 1995

    6 Cha, H, "The Present State and Future of Korean ABS Market" Printed in Korean 4 : 51-73, 2001

    7 Kim, S, "The Effects of Capital Regulation on the Bank Portfolio" Printed in Korean 2002

    8 Daley, "The Effect of Debt Covenants and Political Costs on the Choice of Accounting Methods The Case of Accounting for R&D Costs Journal of Accounting and Economics 5" 1983195-211

    9 Karaoglu, E, "Regulatory Capital and Earnings Management in Banks: The Case of Loan Sales and Securitizations" 2004

    10 Cho, H, "Recognition Incentives for Write-offs of Long-lived asset and Value Relevance" Printed in Korean 31 (31): 1-34, 2006

    11 Yoon, S, "On the Discretionary Recognition of Asset Impairment" Printed in Korean 30 (30): 195-214, 2005

    12 Beatty, A, "Managing Financial Reports of Commercial Banks: The Influence of Taxes, Regulatory Capital, and Earnings" 33 (33): 231-262, 1995

    13 Kanagaretnam, K, "Managerial Incentives for Income Smoothing through Bank Loan Loss Provision" 2001

    14 Sinkey Jr, "Journal of Financial Service Research 1" Bank Loan Loss Provisions and the Income Smoothing Hypothesis 301-318, 19881976-1984

    15 Hwang, I, "Hwang, I" Printed in Korean 21 (21): 177-200, 1996

    16 Moon, H, "Earnings management by Banks through Specific Accruals Approach" Printed in Korean 29 (29): 111-131, 2004

    17 Yoon, S., S, "Earnings Manipulation of Seasoned Equity offering Firms" Printed in Korean 26 (26): 1-25, 2001

    18 Degeorge F, "Earnings Management to Exceed Thresholds" 72 (72): 1-33, 1999

    19 Park, H, "Earnings Management Using Gains on Real Estate Sales" Printed in Korean 26 (26): 87-105, 2001

    20 Bowen, "Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Capitalize Interest Journal of Accounting and Economics 3" 151-179, 1981

    21 Lilien, "Determinants of Intra-method Choice in the Oil and Gas Industry Journal of Accounting and Economics 4" 145-170, 1982

    22 Greenbaum, S, "Contemporary Financial Intermediation" The Dryden Press 1995

    23 Moyer, "Capital Adequacy Ratio Regulations and Accounting Choices in Commercial Banks Journal of Accounting and Economics 13" 123-154, 1990

    24 Kirschenheiter, M, "Can Big Bath Earnings Smoothing Co-exist as Equilibrium Financial Reporting Strategies?" 40 : 761-796, 2002June

    25 Ahmed, A. S, "Bank Loan Loss Provision; A Reexamination of Capital Management, Earnings Management and Signa- ling Effects" 28 (28): 1-25, 1999

    26 Collins, J. H, "Bank Differences in the Coordination of Regulatory Capital, Earnings, and Taxes" 33 (33): 263-292, 1995

    27 Hagerman, "An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice Journal of Accounting and Economics 3" 129-150, 1981

    28 Fudenberg, D, "A Theory of Income and Dividend Smoothing Based on Incumbency Rents" 103 : 75-93, 1995

    29 Bishop, M, "A Cost-benefit Analysis of Accrual Management in the Banking Industry" 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼