RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    글로벌에서 글로컬로: 한국 GU30과 일본 TGUP 비교 분석 = From Global to Glocal : A Comparative Analysis of Korea’s GU30 and Japan’s TGUP

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110179129

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    To globalize its local universities and their students, Korea started what is called Glocal University 30 (GU30) project in 2023. In this paper, I offer a critical evaluation of GU30. Based on this assessment, I contend that, in spite of its noteworthy advantages, the program is insufficient to produce individuals who have both a global perspective and a profound local awareness. The primary cause of GU30’s drawbacks is that it places heavy emphasis on financial gains and performance-based goals. The liberal arts and basic sciences, which are essential for civic and ethical growth, are largely ignored in favor of this emphasis. I also examine Japan’s Top Global University Project (TGUP, 2014-2023) in order to derive useful insights. Given that this comparable national initiative is over, we can assess its successes and failures. Based on this comparative research, I propose a different glocalization model that adds civic and ethical learning outcomes to success measures. My proposal is distinct in that I give the liberal arts continuous institutional support.
    번역하기

    To globalize its local universities and their students, Korea started what is called Glocal University 30 (GU30) project in 2023. In this paper, I offer a critical evaluation of GU30. Based on this assessment, I contend that, in spite of its noteworth...

    To globalize its local universities and their students, Korea started what is called Glocal University 30 (GU30) project in 2023. In this paper, I offer a critical evaluation of GU30. Based on this assessment, I contend that, in spite of its noteworthy advantages, the program is insufficient to produce individuals who have both a global perspective and a profound local awareness. The primary cause of GU30’s drawbacks is that it places heavy emphasis on financial gains and performance-based goals. The liberal arts and basic sciences, which are essential for civic and ethical growth, are largely ignored in favor of this emphasis. I also examine Japan’s Top Global University Project (TGUP, 2014-2023) in order to derive useful insights. Given that this comparable national initiative is over, we can assess its successes and failures. Based on this comparative research, I propose a different glocalization model that adds civic and ethical learning outcomes to success measures. My proposal is distinct in that I give the liberal arts continuous institutional support.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼