RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    A New Approach to Performance Control in Earnings Management Studies

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107249383

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We propose a cash flow from operations (CFO) portfolio approach to performance control issue in earnings management studies, which was initiated Kothari et al.(2005). We argue that the CFO portfolio is less costly, and yet controls performance more properly and ensures more stable and consistent measures of discretionary accruals than the Kothari et al. approach. We address the issues of alternative models as well as estimation approaches to make the study more comprehensive. We carry out diverse analyses and tests and document some important findings. First, the new models proposed by Yoon et al.(2013) are superior to the Jones and modified Jones models. Second, the industry approach results in unsigned or inconsistent regression coefficients across different industries. Third, the CFO portfolio approach significantly outperforms the industry approach, indicating that the estimation approach is more important than the models. Fourth, there are significant differences in mean nondiscretionary and discretionary accruals between different models when the industry approach is used. However, the between-model differences disappear when the CFO portfolio approach is used. Fifth, the Jones models do not properly isolate discretionary accruals particularly when the industry approach is used. We find that the application of a better estimation approach is more important than the choice of models. Sixth, CFO levels and estimation approach matter in terms of type-1 errors. There are larger differences in the rejection rates between the estimation approaches than between the models. However, the rejection rates are mostly lower than the hypothesized rate for the middle CFO level firm-years. Seventh, there are risks of drawing wrong inferences when the ROA control approach is used. Eighth, we document that a significant proportion of negative CFO firms employ income-increasing earnings management strategy to avoid loss reporting, and that there are considerable number of big-bath firms particularly when their CFO level is very low. Lastly, discretionary accruals can be overestimated (underestimated) when CFO level is negative (positive) under the industry approach, indicating that use of the CFO control approach is more warranted.
    번역하기

    We propose a cash flow from operations (CFO) portfolio approach to performance control issue in earnings management studies, which was initiated Kothari et al.(2005). We argue that the CFO portfolio is less costly, and yet controls performance more pr...

    We propose a cash flow from operations (CFO) portfolio approach to performance control issue in earnings management studies, which was initiated Kothari et al.(2005). We argue that the CFO portfolio is less costly, and yet controls performance more properly and ensures more stable and consistent measures of discretionary accruals than the Kothari et al. approach. We address the issues of alternative models as well as estimation approaches to make the study more comprehensive. We carry out diverse analyses and tests and document some important findings. First, the new models proposed by Yoon et al.(2013) are superior to the Jones and modified Jones models. Second, the industry approach results in unsigned or inconsistent regression coefficients across different industries. Third, the CFO portfolio approach significantly outperforms the industry approach, indicating that the estimation approach is more important than the models. Fourth, there are significant differences in mean nondiscretionary and discretionary accruals between different models when the industry approach is used. However, the between-model differences disappear when the CFO portfolio approach is used. Fifth, the Jones models do not properly isolate discretionary accruals particularly when the industry approach is used. We find that the application of a better estimation approach is more important than the choice of models. Sixth, CFO levels and estimation approach matter in terms of type-1 errors. There are larger differences in the rejection rates between the estimation approaches than between the models. However, the rejection rates are mostly lower than the hypothesized rate for the middle CFO level firm-years. Seventh, there are risks of drawing wrong inferences when the ROA control approach is used. Eighth, we document that a significant proportion of negative CFO firms employ income-increasing earnings management strategy to avoid loss reporting, and that there are considerable number of big-bath firms particularly when their CFO level is very low. Lastly, discretionary accruals can be overestimated (underestimated) when CFO level is negative (positive) under the industry approach, indicating that use of the CFO control approach is more warranted.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. Background and Purpose of the Study II. Research Methods III. Empirical Results IV. Conclusions References
    • I. Background and Purpose of the Study II. Research Methods III. Empirical Results IV. Conclusions References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼