「도강록(渡江錄)」에 나타난 경계의 인식론 = THe Epistemology of the boundary shown in the 「Dogangrok」

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

「Yeoelha Ilgi(熱河日記)」is a work that shows the world-class literary achievement. We must read positively Yeonam``s anguish and strategies to go out to the achievement of the aspects. 「Dogangrok」has his thought about how to describe _Yeoelha Ilgi_, so it deserves called the epistemology of the boundary. First, I explored the relationship between the era expression and 「Dogangrok preface」 . ``After three Gyoungja(``後三庚子``)`` was a representation of the product of writer``s spirit of being true of the name and intention to write with subjectivity getting out of an inflexible posture. Three kinds era marks in the beginning shows the identity and the direction of _Yeoelha Ilgi_. Yonam had a dash at crossing between them, while respecting the uniqueness of Myoung, Chung and Chosun. Second, I examined yeonam``s intention to asking Tao at Abrog river, boundary space. Epistemology of the border has proved over the space. Yeonam explained the border(際) using Confucianism, Buddhism and School of Law, So he showed that his thought was not fixed, the meaning of space didn``t belong to the specific idea. Then the place of boundary has the universal truth and was a system of thinking of controlling all conflicts. The recognition of border has Yeonam``s will to introspect I and the objects, our inside, the relations between the outside and the inside reflectly. Boundaries are dangerous and disturbing, however, it is the place that creative reason is generated. Third, I examined equality eye, border men``s eye. Yeonam explained the Buddhist concept of equality, because there was no evidence inConfuciasm to overcome discriminate against Chung. Equality eye asked main agent`s view. As this Yeonam included the epistemology of border of time, space and human at the first chapter 「ogangrok」and made sure to see China objectively and fairly Three arguments about the border has Yeonam`s subjective consciousness to beyonding discrimination and amalgamating study and idea.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박기석, "｢도강록｣에 나타난 연암의 관심사" 한국고전문학교육학회 (21) : 349-373, 2011

2 이현식, "｢도강록서｣, 『열하일기』를 위한 위장 를 위한 위장" 국학연구원 (152) : 163-203, 2010

3 박희병, "한국의 생태사상" 돌베개 1999

4 미야지마 히로시, "초정 박제가 연구" 사람의 무늬 2013

5 정상봉, "원효(元曉) 화쟁사상(和諍思想)과 그 현대적 의의" 인문학연구원 53 : 201-222, 2012

6 김혈조, "열하일기 1․2․3" 돌베개 2009

7 박지원, "열하일기" 돌베개 2009

8 박지원, "열하일기" 북드라망 2014

9 임기중, "연행록전집 53" 동국대학교출판부 2001

10 박지원, "연암집 상․중․하" 돌베개 2007

11 김명호, "연암 문학의 심층 탐구" 돌베개 2013

12 "연민문고소장 연암박지원작품필사본 총서 1권-7권" 문예원 2012

13 박종채, "역주 과정록" 태학사 1997

14 성백효, "맹자집주" 전통문화연구회 1995

15 송영배, "마테오 리치가 소개한 서양학문관의 의미" 한국실학학회 (17) : 7-41, 2009

16 성백효, "대학중용집주" 전통문화연구회 1995

17 박종채, "나의 아버지 박지원" 돌베개 1998

18 한국고전번역원 홈페이지, "국역조선왕조실록 DB"

19 민족문화추진회, "국역연행록선집 Ⅺ"

20 임기중, "燕行錄叢刊增補版"

21 박영철, "燕巖集" 1932

22 신향림, "燕巖 일파 문학론에서 色, 自然, 際" 한국한문학회 (55) : 29-62, 2014

23 김혈조, "燕巖 散文에서 문자 運用의 몇 가지 특징" 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회) (21) : 239-276, 2004

24 金明昊, "『熱河日記』연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1990

25 박수밀, "18세기 지식인의 생각과 글쓰기 전략" 태학사 2007

26 박수밀, "18세기 ‘사이(間)’의 美學과 그 意味－燕巖 一派를 중심으로－" 한국어문교육연구회 32 (32): 237-260, 2004